Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Openclaw is a plot by big vuln to pump up the CVE numbers.

Openclaw is a plot by big vuln to pump up the CVE numbers.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
14 Posts 8 Posters 14 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

    @cR0w cve is just marketing now

    varx@defcon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
    varx@defcon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
    varx@defcon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @Viss @cR0w CVE is a an SEO campaign. It ensures you have a proper CPE and purl reserved, and it means your software's name will be ingested and repeated by vuln scanners, databases and automated news sites. Search engines and LLM datasets will include it more. And it will be linked to many more times (ref nofollow, sure but its still an indirect metric)

    Why pay press release companies hundreds of dollars a story when you can just write horribly insecure code and get the same result for free!

    viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

      RE: https://mastodon.social/@Viss/116524246122483226

      Openclaw is a plot by big vuln to pump up the CVE numbers. Like Fortinet.

      synnfynn@corteximplant.comS This user is from outside of this forum
      synnfynn@corteximplant.comS This user is from outside of this forum
      synnfynn@corteximplant.com
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @cR0w

      Big Vuln? Great. No point in selling 0/n-days. Openclaw/Claude/Mythos just gets milked and coughs them up for free. The one industry I fought so fucking hard to get into and make decent money is now worthless.

      (sorry to vent in your mentions)

      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • varx@defcon.socialV varx@defcon.social

        @Viss @cR0w CVE is a an SEO campaign. It ensures you have a proper CPE and purl reserved, and it means your software's name will be ingested and repeated by vuln scanners, databases and automated news sites. Search engines and LLM datasets will include it more. And it will be linked to many more times (ref nofollow, sure but its still an indirect metric)

        Why pay press release companies hundreds of dollars a story when you can just write horribly insecure code and get the same result for free!

        viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
        viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
        viss@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @varx @cR0w fuckin nailed it

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • synnfynn@corteximplant.comS synnfynn@corteximplant.com

          @cR0w

          Big Vuln? Great. No point in selling 0/n-days. Openclaw/Claude/Mythos just gets milked and coughs them up for free. The one industry I fought so fucking hard to get into and make decent money is now worthless.

          (sorry to vent in your mentions)

          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          cr0w@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @synnfynn Have you seen their vulns though? They're almost all total shit. The bespoke stuff will be harder to grab, but much more valuable.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

            RE: https://mastodon.social/@Viss/116524246122483226

            Openclaw is a plot by big vuln to pump up the CVE numbers. Like Fortinet.

            theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
            theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
            theorangetheme@en.osm.town
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @cR0w I'm guessing they're all some variation of asking the computer "Can I get root pls? :3" and the computer being like "Haha, sure!"

            cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • theorangetheme@en.osm.townT theorangetheme@en.osm.town

              @cR0w I'm guessing they're all some variation of asking the computer "Can I get root pls? :3" and the computer being like "Haha, sure!"

              cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
              cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
              cr0w@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @theorangetheme notices UID 0 0w0 what's this?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                RE: https://mastodon.social/@Viss/116524246122483226

                Openclaw is a plot by big vuln to pump up the CVE numbers. Like Fortinet.

                csolisr@hub.azkware.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                csolisr@hub.azkware.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                csolisr@hub.azkware.net
                wrote last edited by
                #10
                Fortinet? You mean Fortithousandvulnsandcounting?
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                  RE: https://mastodon.social/@Viss/116524246122483226

                  Openclaw is a plot by big vuln to pump up the CVE numbers. Like Fortinet.

                  aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  aakl@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @cR0w If I remember correctly, the "developer" of Moltbook let AI build the whole nightmare scenario we have today while he went to play golf or something. Very responsible.

                  Who gets blamed for fiascos when you're playing golf? You or the AI?

                  cr0w@infosec.exchangeC odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • aakl@infosec.exchangeA aakl@infosec.exchange

                    @cR0w If I remember correctly, the "developer" of Moltbook let AI build the whole nightmare scenario we have today while he went to play golf or something. Very responsible.

                    Who gets blamed for fiascos when you're playing golf? You or the AI?

                    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cr0w@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @AAKL I blame anyone building shit with AI but I don't think that's a popular stance.

                    aakl@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • aakl@infosec.exchangeA aakl@infosec.exchange

                      @cR0w If I remember correctly, the "developer" of Moltbook let AI build the whole nightmare scenario we have today while he went to play golf or something. Very responsible.

                      Who gets blamed for fiascos when you're playing golf? You or the AI?

                      odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
                      odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
                      odr_k4tana@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @AAKL @cR0w golf

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                        @AAKL I blame anyone building shit with AI but I don't think that's a popular stance.

                        aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        aakl@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @cR0w Probably not, but truth hurts. A lot of people would rather not hear it or just get offended when you hit the mark. Sounds like the AI worshipers, doesn't it?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups