Sat in a call where someone has just realised that their whole ISO framework that they've spent months creating is based on an incorrect list of controls that an AI tool gave them.
-
I honestly don't think I've seen such a clear example of time & effort being wasted as a result of blind reliance on AI before.
Let's be clear, it probably won't take that long to fix as a lot of the work will still be applicable (as long as the implementation wasn't AI-drivel too)... but, seriously, all for the sake of not spending the time to read the actual standard?
@Cyberoutsider the fix would be making standards free to read
-
@neoluddite @Cyberoutsider
no. i think LLM use is often a symptom of some larger problem at hand. like standards not being available. or too much workload. genAI is a good tool to conceal what's wrong with a system, and the people at the short end of the stick are told it's actually good for them -
using LLMs for therapy is obviously not good for the user, but just indicates how dysfunctional a medial system is for those who dont have lots of cash on hand.
in the US, you get fucked financially, here in Germany, it's hard to get it through public health insurance, and in the UK ur going on multi-year waitlists for anything trans*-related. -
using LLMs for therapy is obviously not good for the user, but just indicates how dysfunctional a medial system is for those who dont have lots of cash on hand.
in the US, you get fucked financially, here in Germany, it's hard to get it through public health insurance, and in the UK ur going on multi-year waitlists for anything trans*-related.or "AI partners" which are at best an indicator for widespread lonelyness, but probably just a symptom of people desiring "a partner that obeys" (can have its memories edited and such) because all those fucked up patriarchical ideas still inger everywhere under a thin coat of paint
-
@Cyberoutsider people just don't read anything anymore. It's kind of a problem.
@jprjr @Cyberoutsider Hallucinating plagiarism machines are *designed* to feed their victims answers that reduce their ability to do their own critical thinking in favour of relying more with their overhyped Clippy instead.
They actively encourage addictive behavior because it increases shareholder value.
-
@jpm @Cyberoutsider <Takei>Oh, my...</Takei>
-
Sat in a call where someone has just realised that their whole ISO framework that they've spent months creating is based on an incorrect list of controls that an AI tool gave them.
Apparently they never thought to purchase the actual standard and check themselves.
Is there a German word for this?
@Cyberoutsider don't know for them, but for me it's schAIdenfreude
-
@Cyberoutsider the fix would be making standards free to read
@h3 @Cyberoutsider Won't help when they go "Gemini, summarize this page" and it'll cheerfully hallucinate half the information.
-
Sat in a call where someone has just realised that their whole ISO framework that they've spent months creating is based on an incorrect list of controls that an AI tool gave them.
Apparently they never thought to purchase the actual standard and check themselves.
Is there a German word for this?
AI efficiency and time savings in action!
-
Sat in a call where someone has just realised that their whole ISO framework that they've spent months creating is based on an incorrect list of controls that an AI tool gave them.
Apparently they never thought to purchase the actual standard and check themselves.
Is there a German word for this?
@Cyberoutsider Intelligenzkunstwerk
-
@Cyberoutsider the fix would be making standards free to read
Its extremely weird that things are meant to be both standards and paywalled. Like, is it international and for everyone or not?
-
Sat in a call where someone has just realised that their whole ISO framework that they've spent months creating is based on an incorrect list of controls that an AI tool gave them.
Apparently they never thought to purchase the actual standard and check themselves.
Is there a German word for this?
schadenfreude
-
@Cyberoutsider Out of morbid curiosity, especially in regards to the blast radius, which ISO?
@Lemmus 27001 - for some added standards nerdery, what the AI tool provided back was a weird bastardisation of the 2013 version. It entirely ignores the 2022 update that organisations will now be routinely compared against.
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
