Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular.

There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
13 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

    There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

    horse@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
    horse@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
    horse@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @david_chisnall @pluralistic oh no. I'm currently rebuilding my most popular project from scratch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

      There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

      soc@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      soc@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      soc@chaos.social
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @david_chisnall Happens every time creators of popular programming languages get asked about their language design ideas. 😆

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

        There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

        drajt@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
        drajt@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
        drajt@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @david_chisnall companies often think they are great and never consider that they were just lucky.

        When the market changes they suddenly evaporate without trace and are all sulky about it... E.g. Nokia.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

          There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

          jonoleth@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jonoleth@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jonoleth@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @david_chisnall see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flanderization

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

            There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

            khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            khleedril@cyberplace.social
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @david_chisnall Usually the thing is: simplicity. And they never manage to reproduce that.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
            • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

              There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

              pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
              pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
              pizzademon@mastodon.online
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @david_chisnall

              Scion xB's upright driving position without SUV height attracting older customers instead of targeted youth.
              ----- https://www.insidehook.com/autos/doomed-toyota-scion-brand/amp

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

                memeticist@jorts.horseM This user is from outside of this forum
                memeticist@jorts.horseM This user is from outside of this forum
                memeticist@jorts.horse
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @david_chisnall trying to decode whether this is about cheri or about electric light orchestra's fan-favorite album, time (1981)

                driusan@doomscroller.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • memeticist@jorts.horseM memeticist@jorts.horse

                  @david_chisnall trying to decode whether this is about cheri or about electric light orchestra's fan-favorite album, time (1981)

                  driusan@doomscroller.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  driusan@doomscroller.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  driusan@doomscroller.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11
                  @memeticist@jorts.horse @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange I thought it was about Plan 9
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                    There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

                    rentalassistance434654@mstdn.partyR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rentalassistance434654@mstdn.partyR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rentalassistance434654@mstdn.party
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @david_chisnall 🔥 Want to Earn from Home Without Overthinking Everything?
                    Introducing The Profit Shortcut – Home Cashflow Shortcut 💸
                    A simple, practical system made for people who want results—not confusion.

                    ⏰ Special Price Today: Just $99
                    This deal won’t stay forever—once it’s gone, it’s gone.
                    👉 Tap Get Instant Access and start your journey today!

                    Link Preview Image
                    My Main System

                    Today: $99

                    favicon

                    My Main System (mymainsystem8.godaddysites.com)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                      There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

                      grumpydad@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grumpydad@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grumpydad@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @david_chisnall Let me guess: this is about LLM:s

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups