Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. US states should start withholding federal tax money because it is, in fact, taxation without representation all over again -- just internal rather than external this time.

US states should start withholding federal tax money because it is, in fact, taxation without representation all over again -- just internal rather than external this time.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
37 Posts 7 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • vivante@techhub.socialV vivante@techhub.social

    @joeld I think in the US it is more like an information gap. that is exactly what the data shows but I am outside the US so maybe I am wrong with that.

    joeld@tilde.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
    joeld@tilde.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
    joeld@tilde.zone
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    @vivante when you say “it is more like an information gap” what is the “it” in that sentence?

    More generally, when my business files a federal income tax return with the IRS and the business owes taxes, the IRS then withdraws the owed money directly from the business bank account and it goes into the US Treasury. (Same process for individual income taxes.) Where does the state ever have an opportunity of intervening in this transaction?

    vivante@techhub.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • joeld@tilde.zoneJ joeld@tilde.zone

      @vivante when you say “it is more like an information gap” what is the “it” in that sentence?

      More generally, when my business files a federal income tax return with the IRS and the business owes taxes, the IRS then withdraws the owed money directly from the business bank account and it goes into the US Treasury. (Same process for individual income taxes.) Where does the state ever have an opportunity of intervening in this transaction?

      vivante@techhub.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
      vivante@techhub.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
      vivante@techhub.social
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      @joeld In the absence of a "mechanical" middleman like a payroll department, the state’s opportunity to intervene shifts from the start of the transaction to its residue. It = transaction

      joeld@tilde.zoneJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • vivante@techhub.socialV vivante@techhub.social

        @joeld In the absence of a "mechanical" middleman like a payroll department, the state’s opportunity to intervene shifts from the start of the transaction to its residue. It = transaction

        joeld@tilde.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
        joeld@tilde.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
        joeld@tilde.zone
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        @vivante I freely admit I do not understand what you are saying. The state government never handles or holds monies owed to the federal government so they have no way to withhold those monies.

        vivante@techhub.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • joeld@tilde.zoneJ joeld@tilde.zone

          @vivante I freely admit I do not understand what you are saying. The state government never handles or holds monies owed to the federal government so they have no way to withhold those monies.

          vivante@techhub.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
          vivante@techhub.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
          vivante@techhub.social
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @joeld It is largely true that the current financial infrastructure of the US is designed to keep state and federal money in separate "lanes." but it seems that under Trump there are no "normal" operations anymore. My view from outside the US.

          joeld@tilde.zoneJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • vivante@techhub.socialV vivante@techhub.social

            @joeld It is largely true that the current financial infrastructure of the US is designed to keep state and federal money in separate "lanes." but it seems that under Trump there are no "normal" operations anymore. My view from outside the US.

            joeld@tilde.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
            joeld@tilde.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
            joeld@tilde.zone
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            @vivante ok well that’s like saying the current financial structure is designed to keep your grocer’s money and your lawyer’s money in separate lanes. There is no such “design”; there simply was never any reason to mingle those monies. nothing about the way we pay taxes has changed.

            vivante@techhub.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • joeld@tilde.zoneJ joeld@tilde.zone

              @vivante ok well that’s like saying the current financial structure is designed to keep your grocer’s money and your lawyer’s money in separate lanes. There is no such “design”; there simply was never any reason to mingle those monies. nothing about the way we pay taxes has changed.

              vivante@techhub.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
              vivante@techhub.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
              vivante@techhub.social
              wrote last edited by
              #28

              @joeld t looks dramatic from the outside

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
              • codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC codinghorror@infosec.exchange

                US states should start withholding federal tax money because it is, in fact, taxation without representation all over again -- just internal rather than external this time. With respect, federal government, either you properly represent these states (SCOTUS, Senate, etc), or get your state tax revenue elsewhere. Plenty of states to choose from.

                codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                Still working the question. Don't worry, I am on it. It is complex, for sure, but I think the states can exert a LOT of pressure by withholding funds they would normally transfer. Let me source a bit more. Give me time. On Southwest SEATAC to OAK, otherwise I'd be more responsive. My apologies.

                codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • joeld@tilde.zoneJ joeld@tilde.zone

                  @codinghorror joel at jdueck.net

                  codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                  codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                  codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  @joeld wait until I finish sourcing the data, and I will

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • joeld@tilde.zoneJ joeld@tilde.zone

                    @stinerman @codinghorror right, anyone who has filed a tax return should know this. I think people get confused by seeing stats about “which states send more in taxes to the feds than they get back”

                    codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                    codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                    codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31

                    @joeld @stinerman that's a surprisingly small list of states, btw, but you know which ones, for sure

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • vivante@techhub.socialV vivante@techhub.social

                      @codinghorror once you unpack how the U.S. system actually works, the situation is more complex. if states were to start withholding federal taxes, it would amount to de facto nullification or fiscal secession, which would trigger immediate constitutional crisis I guess.

                      codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      @vivante agree, let me finish sourcing, it is more complex than I thought, but welcome to the tax code. Maybe at our constitutional convention we could have a simple flat tax with a mild scale as those who have more, should give more IMHO, I'm tired of the poor and middle class funding the rich, aka "trickle down" bullshit

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • a@852260996.91268476.xyzA a@852260996.91268476.xyz

                        @codinghorror@infosec.exchange that’s a really rude answered. No need for further reply from you thanks. It was my mistake to engage in this conversation.

                        codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                        codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                        codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @a I forgive you

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • stinerman@mastodon.socialS stinerman@mastodon.social

                          @joeld @codinghorror this constantly comes up and while there are payments that the states directly make to the federal government, there's no way for people to withhold payment of taxes to the feds. You could ask your payroll department to do it and then fail to file a tax return. But you will be taken to court for that and will not have a good time.

                          codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                          codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                          codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          @stinerman @joeld agree, and we always pay on time, last year was an exception due to the $20m+ in philanthropy for 2024, but this year I am thinking pay state ASAP and delay federal as much as legally possible without weirdness (no lawyers)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.ioB boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.io

                            @codinghorror I send my federal income taxes directly to the federal government, my state couldn't withhold them if it wanted to.

                            codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                            codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                            codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #35

                            @BoydStephenSmithJr Delay, Delay, Delay.. works for healthcare companies, why not us?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC codinghorror@infosec.exchange

                              Still working the question. Don't worry, I am on it. It is complex, for sure, but I think the states can exert a LOT of pressure by withholding funds they would normally transfer. Let me source a bit more. Give me time. On Southwest SEATAC to OAK, otherwise I'd be more responsive. My apologies.

                              codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                              codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                              codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #36

                              ok, withdrawn, there's less pressure here than I thought. Reformulating. Delay to maximum legal extent, but I dislike putting that on individuals -- or corporations, if there is any difference between the two.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                              • joeld@tilde.zoneJ joeld@tilde.zone

                                @codinghorror joel at jdueck.net

                                codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                codinghorror@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                codinghorror@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #37

                                @joeld you're right, I want to call to strategize further when I get home if that's OK. I want a way forward for all of us.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups