Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What would you do, if a small #nuclear facility funded by #Altman was getting built nearby?

What would you do, if a small #nuclear facility funded by #Altman was getting built nearby?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
nuclearaltmanoklo
5 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cmars@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cmars@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cmars@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    What would you do, if a small #nuclear facility funded by #Altman was getting built nearby?

    Well that is now a question I have to ask myself.

    #Oklo found a county willing to gamble on an untested new design with its land, water table, agriculture and people: https://oklo.com/newsroom/news-details/2026/Oklos-Atomic-Alchemy-Announces-U-S--Department-of-Energy-Approval-for-Nuclear-Safety-Design-Agreement-of-its-Groves-Isotopes-Test-Reactor/default.aspx

    I have serious doubts about the rigor and safety that is going into this. Especially as I can find almost no details about it. The regulators (NRC, DOE) seem to have been captured.

    1/

    cmars@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cmars@infosec.exchangeC cmars@infosec.exchange

      What would you do, if a small #nuclear facility funded by #Altman was getting built nearby?

      Well that is now a question I have to ask myself.

      #Oklo found a county willing to gamble on an untested new design with its land, water table, agriculture and people: https://oklo.com/newsroom/news-details/2026/Oklos-Atomic-Alchemy-Announces-U-S--Department-of-Energy-Approval-for-Nuclear-Safety-Design-Agreement-of-its-Groves-Isotopes-Test-Reactor/default.aspx

      I have serious doubts about the rigor and safety that is going into this. Especially as I can find almost no details about it. The regulators (NRC, DOE) seem to have been captured.

      1/

      cmars@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      cmars@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      cmars@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      The facility is initially going to process nuclear materials for medical applications. However, this is just #Oklo dipping their toe in the pool (of molten sodium).

      The goal for this site is a small-scale reactor for powering.. you guessed it, #AI data centres.

      Powered by uranium waste, but #plutonium is also an option. It says so right in Oklo's SEC 10-K filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1849056/000162828026018698/oklo-20251231.htm (page 14)

      2/

      cmars@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cmars@infosec.exchangeC cmars@infosec.exchange

        The facility is initially going to process nuclear materials for medical applications. However, this is just #Oklo dipping their toe in the pool (of molten sodium).

        The goal for this site is a small-scale reactor for powering.. you guessed it, #AI data centres.

        Powered by uranium waste, but #plutonium is also an option. It says so right in Oklo's SEC 10-K filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1849056/000162828026018698/oklo-20251231.htm (page 14)

        2/

        cmars@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cmars@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cmars@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        I don't know anything about little nuclear reactors. They might be fine... #Austin has a small one in a research lab.

        There is something uncomfortable about this #Groves #Lockhart #Texas site though. The way it's being fast-tracked. The greedy speculation on Oklo's stock online. The association with #Altman. The untested design, that was rejected by the NRC in 2022.

        There's a story untold here, that I'll be digging in to.

        I don't think anyone else is going to tell it.

        3/

        athena@chaosfem.twA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cmars@infosec.exchangeC cmars@infosec.exchange

          I don't know anything about little nuclear reactors. They might be fine... #Austin has a small one in a research lab.

          There is something uncomfortable about this #Groves #Lockhart #Texas site though. The way it's being fast-tracked. The greedy speculation on Oklo's stock online. The association with #Altman. The untested design, that was rejected by the NRC in 2022.

          There's a story untold here, that I'll be digging in to.

          I don't think anyone else is going to tell it.

          3/

          athena@chaosfem.twA This user is from outside of this forum
          athena@chaosfem.twA This user is from outside of this forum
          athena@chaosfem.tw
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @cmars allow me to recommend Radiacode products if you are looking for consumer-accessible radiation detection devices https://www.radiacode.com/

          if everything is copacetic, you don’t need one. but if things are not copacetic in a nuclear way, such things are the only way to tell

          cmars@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • athena@chaosfem.twA athena@chaosfem.tw

            @cmars allow me to recommend Radiacode products if you are looking for consumer-accessible radiation detection devices https://www.radiacode.com/

            if everything is copacetic, you don’t need one. but if things are not copacetic in a nuclear way, such things are the only way to tell

            cmars@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cmars@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cmars@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @Athena Thanks so much for the recommendation, #radiacode looks awesome! A 103 is on the way, least I can do is take a baseline.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups