A published author used Claude to write a book about AI making things up and then is surprised when his book contains made up things.

[cyrevolt@mastodon.social]

@GossiTheDog my humor exactly, love it

[retrocomputing@mastodon.social]

@GossiTheDog
Oh the irony... Besides he's starting fact-checking only after someone caught him.
Not sure he has such a good grasp of the topic

[mindbreak@mastodon.social]

@GossiTheDog

[negative12dollarbill@techhub.social]

@GossiTheDog
TFW you have to launch an investigation into the writing of the book you wrote

[lookatableflip@infosec.exchange]

@GossiTheDog would've kinda been funny if it was an early example of the AI field generating something back when it was new. Or a quote of "Daisy" when the first computer spoke

[cwbussard@ioc.exchange]

@GossiTheDog

You're pulling our legs, right? You've got to be...

[tstudent@infosec.exchange]

@negative12dollarbill @GossiTheDog "In his statement, Mr. Rosenbaum said that if the episode “serves as a warning about the risks of A.I.-assisted research and verification, that is why I wrote the book.”"

[zambunny@livellosegreto.it]

@GossiTheDog An effing genius

[ox1de@cyberplace.social]

@GossiTheDog i think we live on Htrae, now

[bontchev@infosec.exchange]

@GossiTheDog Well, this *is* the future of "truth", what.

[mcdanlj@social.makerforums.info]

@GossiTheDog NY Times sure missed some irony quotes in that. Should be:

Steven Rosenbaum, "author" of "The Future of Truth,"...

[csolisr@hub.azkware.net]

You see, he was trying to prove his point by providing some "self-made" examples

[ferrix@mastodon.online]

@GossiTheDog @simonzerafa I instructed the Machine Incapable Of Understanding Or Truth not to say anything untruthful and it insisted that it understood

[simonzerafa@infosec.exchange]

@ferrix @GossiTheDog

Reminds me a little of the @Chrishallbeck series about the Two Doors

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5HuFqNamMi-tPyeDyOhzJGSf5kHwbEt_