Google book search lists /Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things/¹ as published in 2008.
-
Google book search lists /Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things/¹ as published in 2008. The book itself says 1987. (As do I, who read it *way* before 2008.)
Google says /The Big Book of Concepts/² was published in 2004. MIT Press claims 2002.
My theory is they’re poisoning book search to set expectations for accuracy low enough that their LLM can clear the bar.
¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%2C_Fire%2C_and_Dangerous_Things
² https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/2683/The-Big-Book-of-Concepts -
Google book search lists /Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things/¹ as published in 2008. The book itself says 1987. (As do I, who read it *way* before 2008.)
Google says /The Big Book of Concepts/² was published in 2004. MIT Press claims 2002.
My theory is they’re poisoning book search to set expectations for accuracy low enough that their LLM can clear the bar.
¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%2C_Fire%2C_and_Dangerous_Things
² https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/2683/The-Big-Book-of-Concepts@marick Is this about editions? Book data is really interesting, there's ISBNs, which are about royalties, and UPC, which are about sales, and several cataloging-oriented ids, any of which mutate independently.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
