Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. People, the draft is NOT back (yet).

People, the draft is NOT back (yet).

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 17 Posters 6 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hydropsyche@ecoevo.socialH hydropsyche@ecoevo.social

    @LeslieBurns It certainly might make one wonder why we can’t be automatically registered to vote

    leslieburns@esq.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
    leslieburns@esq.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
    leslieburns@esq.social
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @hydropsyche Exactly. I've seen some people raising this issue.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • leslieburns@esq.socialL leslieburns@esq.social

      People, the draft is NOT back (yet). Males have had to register for the SSS for a long time now and the change is that instead of them doing it themselves, the government is automatically registering them. That's all (again, for now).

      Now, I think that is itself a bad thing, but saying that the draft is back is not at all accurate.

      We have enough scary shit out there, don't make it worse.

      cynblogger@sfba.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cynblogger@sfba.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cynblogger@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @LeslieBurns
      C’mon. Making scary shit worse is social media’s bread & butter. Or avocado toast, whatever.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • hydropsyche@ecoevo.socialH hydropsyche@ecoevo.social

        @LeslieBurns It certainly might make one wonder why we can’t be automatically registered to vote

        cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstamp@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @hydropsyche @LeslieBurns Bingo.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • leslieburns@esq.socialL leslieburns@esq.social

          People, the draft is NOT back (yet). Males have had to register for the SSS for a long time now and the change is that instead of them doing it themselves, the government is automatically registering them. That's all (again, for now).

          Now, I think that is itself a bad thing, but saying that the draft is back is not at all accurate.

          We have enough scary shit out there, don't make it worse.

          karlauerbach@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          karlauerbach@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          karlauerbach@sfba.social
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @LeslieBurns On the other hand many of us are, without knowing it, part of the "militia of the United States"....

          (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

          (b) The classes of the militia are—

          (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

          (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

          Link Preview Image
          10 U.S. Code § 246 - Militia: composition and classes

          favicon

          LII / Legal Information Institute (www.law.cornell.edu)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • leslieburns@esq.socialL leslieburns@esq.social

            People, the draft is NOT back (yet). Males have had to register for the SSS for a long time now and the change is that instead of them doing it themselves, the government is automatically registering them. That's all (again, for now).

            Now, I think that is itself a bad thing, but saying that the draft is back is not at all accurate.

            We have enough scary shit out there, don't make it worse.

            finchhaven@sfba.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            finchhaven@sfba.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            finchhaven@sfba.social
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @LeslieBurns

            My point was entirely focused on the fact that "men" were specifically mentioned

            What with Pete #KineticStrike #Hegseth being who he is and all, that specific declaration carries a lot of weight with me

            IOW: no women need apply, and no women will even be "selected"

            There will be no girls in Hegseth's #MansArmy

            And there's the issue of exactly what dataset / database is the source here

            The IRS was it? A specific subset culled by #Musk's little #DOGE #Shitlords?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hydropsyche@ecoevo.socialH hydropsyche@ecoevo.social

              @LeslieBurns It certainly might make one wonder why we can’t be automatically registered to vote

              ahimsa_pdx@disabled.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              ahimsa_pdx@disabled.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              ahimsa_pdx@disabled.social
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @hydropsyche @LeslieBurns

              Quite a few states have automatic voter registration (AVR). My state, Oregon, has AVR.

              It's often called "motor voter" because it started at the DMV (dept of motor vehicles) Some states are looking beyond the DMV to get more people automatically registered to vote.

              Just a moment...

              favicon

              (www.findlaw.com)

              And then there's North Dakota which doesn't even require registration!

              Sorry if this is too rambling, voting issues are interesting to me.

              hydropsyche@ecoevo.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • leslieburns@esq.socialL leslieburns@esq.social

                People, the draft is NOT back (yet). Males have had to register for the SSS for a long time now and the change is that instead of them doing it themselves, the government is automatically registering them. That's all (again, for now).

                Now, I think that is itself a bad thing, but saying that the draft is back is not at all accurate.

                We have enough scary shit out there, don't make it worse.

                chucklessmith@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                chucklessmith@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                chucklessmith@mstdn.social
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @LeslieBurns I wonder who's inflaming this situation? I filled out the card.

                I also did drag from time to time for a little while when that was a disqualifying factor, just in case.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • leslieburns@esq.socialL leslieburns@esq.social

                  People, the draft is NOT back (yet). Males have had to register for the SSS for a long time now and the change is that instead of them doing it themselves, the government is automatically registering them. That's all (again, for now).

                  Now, I think that is itself a bad thing, but saying that the draft is back is not at all accurate.

                  We have enough scary shit out there, don't make it worse.

                  misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  misusecase@twit.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @LeslieBurns @mattblaze Who wants to bet that the automatic registration will be facilitated by some half-baked AI though?

                  mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • misusecase@twit.socialM misusecase@twit.social

                    @LeslieBurns @mattblaze Who wants to bet that the automatic registration will be facilitated by some half-baked AI though?

                    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mattblaze@federate.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @MisuseCase @LeslieBurns No doubt they will make errors. Which raises a question. Failure to register currently has significant consequences: possible criminal prosecution, and, unless you can show the failure wasn't willful, lifetime debarment from certain federal benefits, including employment.

                    With automatic registration, will those who aren't auto-registered (through no fault of their own) be entitled to a presumption that their failure wasn't willful? Or is the burden on you to check?

                    misusecase@twit.socialM cptbutton@dice.campC 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • leslieburns@esq.socialL leslieburns@esq.social

                      People, the draft is NOT back (yet). Males have had to register for the SSS for a long time now and the change is that instead of them doing it themselves, the government is automatically registering them. That's all (again, for now).

                      Now, I think that is itself a bad thing, but saying that the draft is back is not at all accurate.

                      We have enough scary shit out there, don't make it worse.

                      stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stevebellovin@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @LeslieBurns @mattblaze Back when the world was young and the Vietnam War was raging, there was a lottery based on birthday during some year, assigning each person a number. There was a cut-off number for the year, and if you were eligible for the draft even one day during the year but your number was too high, you were effectively exempt. I lucked out with a high number, and so on December 31 of the appropriate year, I was on line at the main post office in Manhattan to send a certified letter to my draft board surrendering my student deferment. The clerk asked me why so many people were sending certified letters to their draft boards that day…

                      mattblaze@federate.socialM karlauerbach@sfba.socialK 3 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS stevebellovin@infosec.exchange

                        @LeslieBurns @mattblaze Back when the world was young and the Vietnam War was raging, there was a lottery based on birthday during some year, assigning each person a number. There was a cut-off number for the year, and if you were eligible for the draft even one day during the year but your number was too high, you were effectively exempt. I lucked out with a high number, and so on December 31 of the appropriate year, I was on line at the main post office in Manhattan to send a certified letter to my draft board surrendering my student deferment. The clerk asked me why so many people were sending certified letters to their draft boards that day…

                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mattblaze@federate.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @SteveBellovin @LeslieBurns And you didn't even have bone spurs!

                        stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS stevebellovin@infosec.exchange

                          @LeslieBurns @mattblaze Back when the world was young and the Vietnam War was raging, there was a lottery based on birthday during some year, assigning each person a number. There was a cut-off number for the year, and if you were eligible for the draft even one day during the year but your number was too high, you were effectively exempt. I lucked out with a high number, and so on December 31 of the appropriate year, I was on line at the main post office in Manhattan to send a certified letter to my draft board surrendering my student deferment. The clerk asked me why so many people were sending certified letters to their draft boards that day…

                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mattblaze@federate.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          @SteveBellovin @LeslieBurns The current system is much more convenient. Selective Service now lets you download and print your draft card in case you need to burn one.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                            @SteveBellovin @LeslieBurns And you didn't even have bone spurs!

                            stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            stevebellovin@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            @mattblaze @LeslieBurns Student deferments were arguably even more unfair, since they applied primarily to college students—predominantly white, at least middle class, etc. Earlier, I had sent a letter to my draft board saying that I didn't know if I could take part in a war I considered morally unjust, and I spent a lot of time wondering what I would do if I received that dreaded letter, but it never happened. (Aside: by that point, other than college students, student deferments were available to seminary students—so seminaries therefore saw quite an enrollment jump, with lots of DD degrees awarded.)

                            mattblaze@federate.socialM yuhasz01@mastodon.socialY oclsc@mstdn.caO 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                              @MisuseCase @LeslieBurns No doubt they will make errors. Which raises a question. Failure to register currently has significant consequences: possible criminal prosecution, and, unless you can show the failure wasn't willful, lifetime debarment from certain federal benefits, including employment.

                              With automatic registration, will those who aren't auto-registered (through no fault of their own) be entitled to a presumption that their failure wasn't willful? Or is the burden on you to check?

                              misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              misusecase@twit.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              @mattblaze @LeslieBurns I know the answer to that one too. One can’t expect any kind of reasonableness from the people currently in charge.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS stevebellovin@infosec.exchange

                                @mattblaze @LeslieBurns Student deferments were arguably even more unfair, since they applied primarily to college students—predominantly white, at least middle class, etc. Earlier, I had sent a letter to my draft board saying that I didn't know if I could take part in a war I considered morally unjust, and I spent a lot of time wondering what I would do if I received that dreaded letter, but it never happened. (Aside: by that point, other than college students, student deferments were available to seminary students—so seminaries therefore saw quite an enrollment jump, with lots of DD degrees awarded.)

                                mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mattblaze@federate.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #17

                                @SteveBellovin @LeslieBurns I understand that the preferred strategy was to get yourself arrested for littering....

                                stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS marchyman@sfba.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                  @SteveBellovin @LeslieBurns I understand that the preferred strategy was to get yourself arrested for littering....

                                  stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  stevebellovin@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @mattblaze @LeslieBurns Do I need to repost the link to my Alice's Restaurant photo tour?

                                  noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS stevebellovin@infosec.exchange

                                    @mattblaze @LeslieBurns Do I need to repost the link to my Alice's Restaurant photo tour?

                                    noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    noplasticshower@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @SteveBellovin @mattblaze @LeslieBurns yes

                                    stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN noplasticshower@infosec.exchange

                                      @SteveBellovin @mattblaze @LeslieBurns yes

                                      stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      stevebellovin@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @noplasticshower @mattblaze @LeslieBurns You got it! The Alice's Restaurant Photo Tour: https://urbandinosaurs.org/blog/2024-12/2024-12-07.html

                                      stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS jef@mastodon.socialJ noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN 3 Replies Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                        @MisuseCase @LeslieBurns No doubt they will make errors. Which raises a question. Failure to register currently has significant consequences: possible criminal prosecution, and, unless you can show the failure wasn't willful, lifetime debarment from certain federal benefits, including employment.

                                        With automatic registration, will those who aren't auto-registered (through no fault of their own) be entitled to a presumption that their failure wasn't willful? Or is the burden on you to check?

                                        cptbutton@dice.campC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cptbutton@dice.campC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cptbutton@dice.camp
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @mattblaze @MisuseCase @LeslieBurns

                                        I doubt it, even if we get a sorta honest administration again someday.

                                        And I suspect you are still liable if they make a mistake, either in registering you, or in updating your address. In the past, failing to update your address was just as great a crime as not registering.

                                        Not being sufficiently diligent in making sure they got your new address and updated their records correctly was *also* the same crime.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS stevebellovin@infosec.exchange

                                          @noplasticshower @mattblaze @LeslieBurns You got it! The Alice's Restaurant Photo Tour: https://urbandinosaurs.org/blog/2024-12/2024-12-07.html

                                          stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          stevebellovin@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #22

                                          @noplasticshower @mattblaze @LeslieBurns (I should post a link every Thanksgiving…)

                                          noplasticshower@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups