Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Please don't refer to electronics going to a landfill just to make a point about disposable technology.

Please don't refer to electronics going to a landfill just to make a point about disposable technology.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
ewastetechnologyrecyclingelectronics
12 Posts 5 Posters 31 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • poleguy@mastodon.socialP poleguy@mastodon.social

    @rattlesnakestu good point. And a very good aspiration.

    I'm afraid the truth of the matter though is still ~78% of ewaste ends up in a landfill.

    I live in Oak Park Illinois, one of the most green granola spots in the US and they tell you to jump through hoops to dispose of electronics properly. We have village compost bins and recycling. But ewaste seems not to be visible.

    They tell you to call a number or visit a website and consult a list and schedule a pick up. Most people will not.

    rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR This user is from outside of this forum
    rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR This user is from outside of this forum
    rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @poleguy

    I understand it's still common. I've been working in electronics recycling & ITAD for over 8 years, working my way up from the production floor (sorting belt) to management. I'm familiar with the industry and how businesses and consumers dispose of their technology.

    The more people treat "landfill" as normal for electronics disposal, the more it will continue. That's why I want people to stop saying it when they know better, because saying it to someone who doesn't know better perpetuates the problem.

    lunaphied@provably.onlineL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de

      Please don't refer to electronics going to a landfill just to make a point about disposable technology.

      This phrase normalizes the idea of landfilling obsolete/unwanted electronics. That is NOT the correct disposal method, anywhere, for electronics or electrical gear.

      Even if you already know this, using "landfill" in place of "e-waste bin" paints a very different picture in the mind of your reader/audience, and you can't know what they do or don't know.

      Normalize correct disposal of obsolete (or unwanted) technology. Please.

      #ewaste #technology #recycling #electronics

      amenonsen@flipping.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
      amenonsen@flipping.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
      amenonsen@flipping.rocks
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @rattlesnakestu Alas, electronics going into landfills is itself still the normal outcome here (and presumably also elsewhere), to a large extent. Yes, there are people who do scavenge through garbage for anything they can extract and sell to recyclers or elsewhere, but they can't keep up with the volume of e-waste. And "official" e-waste disposal organisations seem clueless and overwhelmed to the extent that I strongly suspect they just dump the stuff they get anyway. (At least, that's the impression I formed several years ago when I tried to dispose of a bunch of old electronics.)

      rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • amenonsen@flipping.rocksA amenonsen@flipping.rocks

        @rattlesnakestu Alas, electronics going into landfills is itself still the normal outcome here (and presumably also elsewhere), to a large extent. Yes, there are people who do scavenge through garbage for anything they can extract and sell to recyclers or elsewhere, but they can't keep up with the volume of e-waste. And "official" e-waste disposal organisations seem clueless and overwhelmed to the extent that I strongly suspect they just dump the stuff they get anyway. (At least, that's the impression I formed several years ago when I tried to dispose of a bunch of old electronics.)

        rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR This user is from outside of this forum
        rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR This user is from outside of this forum
        rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @amenonsen

        I suppose it depends a lot on where you are and what organizations are available.

        As someone who has worked in electronics recycling and ITAD for over 8 years, I can promise that none of the companies I've worked for ever intentionally dumped electronics in an inappropriate way. Instead, we are extremely careful to avoid even accidentally letting electronics get mixed in with the landfill-bound solid waste (plastic packaging, etc.).

        Regardless, my point is strictly about how e-waste disposal is discussed by people who know it should not go to a landfill. I fully realize that much of it does - but this problem is not helped by people treating that like it's normal when they know it's wrong.

        amenonsen@flipping.rocksA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de

          @amenonsen

          I suppose it depends a lot on where you are and what organizations are available.

          As someone who has worked in electronics recycling and ITAD for over 8 years, I can promise that none of the companies I've worked for ever intentionally dumped electronics in an inappropriate way. Instead, we are extremely careful to avoid even accidentally letting electronics get mixed in with the landfill-bound solid waste (plastic packaging, etc.).

          Regardless, my point is strictly about how e-waste disposal is discussed by people who know it should not go to a landfill. I fully realize that much of it does - but this problem is not helped by people treating that like it's normal when they know it's wrong.

          amenonsen@flipping.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
          amenonsen@flipping.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
          amenonsen@flipping.rocks
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @rattlesnakestu Fair enough, I wasn't disagreeing with your point so much as expressing my level of despair at the situation here (in India). Maybe it's getting better here too, I don't know.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de

            @poleguy

            I understand it's still common. I've been working in electronics recycling & ITAD for over 8 years, working my way up from the production floor (sorting belt) to management. I'm familiar with the industry and how businesses and consumers dispose of their technology.

            The more people treat "landfill" as normal for electronics disposal, the more it will continue. That's why I want people to stop saying it when they know better, because saying it to someone who doesn't know better perpetuates the problem.

            lunaphied@provably.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
            lunaphied@provably.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
            lunaphied@provably.online
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @poleguy @rattlesnakestu it'll never be normalized until it's free and as available as a trash bin. Even as someone who desperately wanted to properly ewaste things I've had to give up in most places I've lived.

            That being said I don't think this is a phrasing thing that normalizes it I think it's an availability and cost thing. If I'm poor or even just not well to do I'm not spending $30-60 to dispose of a screen as a consumer.

            Basically the most effective systems for recovery have economic incentives at the moment. If you look at things like bottle return in Europe we need to apply this to electronics so doing the right thing is a positive instead of a negative cost. The same way it's often better to destroy equipment to count it a different way for tax purposes for companies

            lunaphied@provably.onlineL rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • lunaphied@provably.onlineL lunaphied@provably.online

              @poleguy @rattlesnakestu it'll never be normalized until it's free and as available as a trash bin. Even as someone who desperately wanted to properly ewaste things I've had to give up in most places I've lived.

              That being said I don't think this is a phrasing thing that normalizes it I think it's an availability and cost thing. If I'm poor or even just not well to do I'm not spending $30-60 to dispose of a screen as a consumer.

              Basically the most effective systems for recovery have economic incentives at the moment. If you look at things like bottle return in Europe we need to apply this to electronics so doing the right thing is a positive instead of a negative cost. The same way it's often better to destroy equipment to count it a different way for tax purposes for companies

              lunaphied@provably.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
              lunaphied@provably.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
              lunaphied@provably.online
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @poleguy @rattlesnakestu to be clear I think a lot of places I see it already do cover "dispose of" instead of "landfill" but also if saying you took it to the skip is accurate than that's what you're going to say

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lunaphied@provably.onlineL lunaphied@provably.online

                @poleguy @rattlesnakestu it'll never be normalized until it's free and as available as a trash bin. Even as someone who desperately wanted to properly ewaste things I've had to give up in most places I've lived.

                That being said I don't think this is a phrasing thing that normalizes it I think it's an availability and cost thing. If I'm poor or even just not well to do I'm not spending $30-60 to dispose of a screen as a consumer.

                Basically the most effective systems for recovery have economic incentives at the moment. If you look at things like bottle return in Europe we need to apply this to electronics so doing the right thing is a positive instead of a negative cost. The same way it's often better to destroy equipment to count it a different way for tax purposes for companies

                rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR This user is from outside of this forum
                rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR This user is from outside of this forum
                rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @Lunaphied @poleguy

                Nothing of value (including waste disposal) is truly free. People pay to dispose of their trash, maybe not when they're walking down the street but certainly at home, although the cost may not be paid directly.

                If by "free" you mean taxpayer-funded, I have seen some of that when I worked at a company that accepted consumer electronics, but it was *very* limited in scope (basically, residents of one county could drop off their electronics for free, anyone else would pay by the pound - yet still typically at a loss or break-even for the company).

                The cost could be made invisible to the consumer like for bottle returns - the cost is built into the product purchase price. Not free but feels like it. Recycling electronics is generally not a profitable venture, so it must be financially supported by others (e.g., governments (taxpayers) & electronics manufacturers subsidize a lot of it).

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de

                  Please don't refer to electronics going to a landfill just to make a point about disposable technology.

                  This phrase normalizes the idea of landfilling obsolete/unwanted electronics. That is NOT the correct disposal method, anywhere, for electronics or electrical gear.

                  Even if you already know this, using "landfill" in place of "e-waste bin" paints a very different picture in the mind of your reader/audience, and you can't know what they do or don't know.

                  Normalize correct disposal of obsolete (or unwanted) technology. Please.

                  #ewaste #technology #recycling #electronics

                  ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                  ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                  ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @rattlesnakestu
                  These endpoint facilities to your ewaste disposal facility will make sure that reusable components of your electronics go back to market where they need to be. (---express)

                  Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                  rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchangeR ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchange

                    @rattlesnakestu
                    These endpoint facilities to your ewaste disposal facility will make sure that reusable components of your electronics go back to market where they need to be. (---express)

                    Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                    rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @RueNahcMohr

                    That's not how responsible, certified, and audited processors manage their downstreams - speaking from first-hand experience.

                    My point is that people should dispose of electronics responsibly and not implicitly normalize illegal dumping. The fact that not all disposal is handled responsibly doesn't contradict my point, it underscores it.

                    ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchangeR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.deR rattlesnakestu@nerdculture.de

                      @RueNahcMohr

                      That's not how responsible, certified, and audited processors manage their downstreams - speaking from first-hand experience.

                      My point is that people should dispose of electronics responsibly and not implicitly normalize illegal dumping. The fact that not all disposal is handled responsibly doesn't contradict my point, it underscores it.

                      ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ruenahcmohr@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @rattlesnakestu I would REALLY like to see tracking data from a random assortment of collection facilities to see where stuff actually goes. I'm pretty sure the stuff collected here in canada gets incinerated out in ontario. but more likely shipped overseas.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups