Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "At least you've got job security"

"At least you've got job security"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
16 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    munin@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    "At least you've got job security"

    I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

    No, I don't.

    My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

    Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

    Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

    And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

    So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

    nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN munin@infosec.exchangeM aburka@hachyderm.ioA bovaz@misskey.socialB bms48@mastodon.socialB 7 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

      "At least you've got job security"

      I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

      No, I don't.

      My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

      Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

      Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

      And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

      So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

      nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
      nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
      nosirrahsec@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @munin Yup, I'm so secure right now.

      SO SECURE

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

        "At least you've got job security"

        I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

        No, I don't.

        My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

        Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

        Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

        And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

        So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

        munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
        munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
        munin@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Furthermore I have -zero- interest in cleaning up -this- mess once the LLMs have turbofucked everyone and ground their infrastructure into unusable rubbish.

        Like, seriously, if you ripped out the engine of your car and replaced it with a vat of shit-flavored pudding, do you think that your mechanic would appreciate seeing that towed into her service bay? Especially if you were demanding that it be fixed without the appropriate budget and resources to hazmat-vaporize the fecal slurry and replace it with OEM spec parts?

        munin@infosec.exchangeM sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blogS kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

          Furthermore I have -zero- interest in cleaning up -this- mess once the LLMs have turbofucked everyone and ground their infrastructure into unusable rubbish.

          Like, seriously, if you ripped out the engine of your car and replaced it with a vat of shit-flavored pudding, do you think that your mechanic would appreciate seeing that towed into her service bay? Especially if you were demanding that it be fixed without the appropriate budget and resources to hazmat-vaporize the fecal slurry and replace it with OEM spec parts?

          munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          munin@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Not to mention - there's no fucking juniors out there being hired, so I have to do all the scut work that you normally use to -train- juniors, if I want it done right, because - surprise! - nobody's fucking hiring juniors on because they believe the fucking LLM jockeys' bullshit promises.

          Anthropic and everyone like them can go fucking eat shit.

          tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.oneT bms48@mastodon.socialB doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

            "At least you've got job security"

            I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

            No, I don't.

            My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

            Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

            Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

            And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

            So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

            aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
            aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
            aburka@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @munin this is what I keep yelling at coworkers... even if we technical professionals can see past the facade, the decision makers with power over us cannot

            munin@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • aburka@hachyderm.ioA aburka@hachyderm.io

              @munin this is what I keep yelling at coworkers... even if we technical professionals can see past the facade, the decision makers with power over us cannot

              munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
              munin@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
              munin@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @aburka

              these assholes can't be trusted with money

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                Not to mention - there's no fucking juniors out there being hired, so I have to do all the scut work that you normally use to -train- juniors, if I want it done right, because - surprise! - nobody's fucking hiring juniors on because they believe the fucking LLM jockeys' bullshit promises.

                Anthropic and everyone like them can go fucking eat shit.

                tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.oneT This user is from outside of this forum
                tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.oneT This user is from outside of this forum
                tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.one
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @munin

                Anthropic and everyone like them can go fucking eat shit.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                  "At least you've got job security"

                  I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

                  No, I don't.

                  My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

                  Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

                  Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

                  And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

                  So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

                  bovaz@misskey.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bovaz@misskey.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bovaz@misskey.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8
                  @munin@infosec.exchange "Even tho it demonstrably does not" a sad part about this is that understanding the demonstration takes an amount of competence that most llm addicts refuse to have.
                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bovaz@misskey.socialB bovaz@misskey.social
                    @munin@infosec.exchange "Even tho it demonstrably does not" a sad part about this is that understanding the demonstration takes an amount of competence that most llm addicts refuse to have.
                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    iwoakura@twit.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @bovaz

                    Yeah I wondered about that, too. Some of the people I know hold degrees + positions. And they enthusiastically feed their most private + work-sensitive kompromat to Δltman and kΔrp.

                    I generated an image a few years ago showing a net was trained on cake and pudding it had never seen both in one picture and when asked to generate one, it enthusiastically generated garbage.

                    It's a statistical model not sentient. These ppl can supposedly think critically?!

                    Edit: image for funsies
                    @munin

                    Link Preview Image
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                      Furthermore I have -zero- interest in cleaning up -this- mess once the LLMs have turbofucked everyone and ground their infrastructure into unusable rubbish.

                      Like, seriously, if you ripped out the engine of your car and replaced it with a vat of shit-flavored pudding, do you think that your mechanic would appreciate seeing that towed into her service bay? Especially if you were demanding that it be fixed without the appropriate budget and resources to hazmat-vaporize the fecal slurry and replace it with OEM spec parts?

                      sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blogS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blogS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blog
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @munin Absolutely this. If I lose my job in devops/infrastructure related work (either through LLM-induced ragequit or layoffs), there's no fucking way I'm returning to un-fuck the mess these assholes have made.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                        Furthermore I have -zero- interest in cleaning up -this- mess once the LLMs have turbofucked everyone and ground their infrastructure into unusable rubbish.

                        Like, seriously, if you ripped out the engine of your car and replaced it with a vat of shit-flavored pudding, do you think that your mechanic would appreciate seeing that towed into her service bay? Especially if you were demanding that it be fixed without the appropriate budget and resources to hazmat-vaporize the fecal slurry and replace it with OEM spec parts?

                        kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kwazekwaze@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @munin Also a nonzero probability they still insist we try to fix their car using even more pudding given the level of brain worms we're currently dealing with.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                          "At least you've got job security"

                          I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

                          No, I don't.

                          My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

                          Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

                          Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

                          And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

                          So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

                          bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bms48@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @munin To his credit, the venerable @gradybooch has spoken out against the demagogue partly responsible for this.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                            Not to mention - there's no fucking juniors out there being hired, so I have to do all the scut work that you normally use to -train- juniors, if I want it done right, because - surprise! - nobody's fucking hiring juniors on because they believe the fucking LLM jockeys' bullshit promises.

                            Anthropic and everyone like them can go fucking eat shit.

                            bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bms48@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @munin I refer to the scut in my current project as "dogshit refactorings". And I "shitcan" technical debt. I will most likely resort to good old sed + find + xargs and clang-tidy for most of the "dogshit". pi-dev with <<insert name of chinese open weights model here>> would be a last resort.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                              "At least you've got job security"

                              I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

                              No, I don't.

                              My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

                              Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

                              Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

                              And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

                              So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

                              catwoman69y2k@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              catwoman69y2k@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              catwoman69y2k@meow.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @munin So many people think that those who lost thier jobs will just get them back in ~2 years...supposedly when these companies realize the error of thier ways.

                              Ummm.... yeah.... about that....

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                                "At least you've got job security"

                                I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

                                No, I don't.

                                My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

                                Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

                                Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

                                And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

                                So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

                                ra6bit@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ra6bit@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ra6bit@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @munin On the upside, they are really not going to like the wooden shoes we subsequently toss into the mill works with all our free time and anger.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • munin@infosec.exchangeM munin@infosec.exchange

                                  Not to mention - there's no fucking juniors out there being hired, so I have to do all the scut work that you normally use to -train- juniors, if I want it done right, because - surprise! - nobody's fucking hiring juniors on because they believe the fucking LLM jockeys' bullshit promises.

                                  Anthropic and everyone like them can go fucking eat shit.

                                  doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @munin
                                  I recently saw a post of a Twitter screenshot or something where someone said they're hiring juniors to do simple stuff because it's cheaper than tokens 😄

                                  No idea if it was real though, may be fake or joke

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups