Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. okay so i read this whole thing and what i am getting is he made a bot to essentially vandalize wikipedia because it was easier than learning markdown.

okay so i read this whole thing and what i am getting is he made a bot to essentially vandalize wikipedia because it was easier than learning markdown.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
40 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nora@blob.loveN nora@blob.love

    "There’s all of these formatting standards and you have to know how to do the citations properly. And it’s, like, a barrier to entry. There’s a lot of friction."

    counterpoint: its markdown

    nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nonehitwonder@tenforward.social
    wrote last edited by
    #31

    @nora describing needing to know how to do a thing as a barrier to entry for doing that thing is the dumbest thing I've heard this minute.

    nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN bridgeenjoyer@gamepad.clubB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • nora@blob.loveN nora@blob.love

      you're supposed to get started in wikipedia by fixing typos and shit not AUTHORING ENTIRE PAGES FROM SCRATCH like of COURSE that is going to get flagged and if you thought for 5 minutes about how wikipedia would have to be structured for it to work you would see that

      wehpudicabok@kind.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
      wehpudicabok@kind.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
      wehpudicabok@kind.social
      wrote last edited by
      #32

      @nora i kept waiting for him to say he fact-checked the stuff his program was outputting and of course that moment never came. even setting aside the AI use it's astonishing how little respect these people have for other humans, that they think we'd appreciate having unverified information just dumped on the site

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • nora@blob.loveN nora@blob.love

        okay so i read this whole thing and what i am getting is he made a bot to essentially vandalize wikipedia because it was easier than learning markdown. have we considered maybe these people are just really fucking stupid https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/03/i-was-surprised-how-upset-some-people-got-a-conversation-with-the-creator-of-tomwikiassist-the-bot-that-edited-wikipedia/

        ticho@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
        ticho@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
        ticho@mas.to
        wrote last edited by
        #33

        @nora Look at the silver lining - the Wikipedia moderation system seems to work, it caught this moron and stopped him. 🙂

        What an interview with a moron is doing in a public article, that I don't understand. Back in my days, village idiots were shunned, or at least ignored, not given a megaphone. 🙄

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN nonehitwonder@tenforward.social

          @nora describing needing to know how to do a thing as a barrier to entry for doing that thing is the dumbest thing I've heard this minute.

          nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          nonehitwonder@tenforward.social
          wrote last edited by
          #34

          @nora I shouldn't be surprised that the same people who think "practicing at drawing for many years" is the same as "gatekeeping art" find the requirement to pursue knowledge in order to competently do a thing to be oppressive.

          purpleglazedbeaver@mstdn.dkP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nora@blob.loveN nora@blob.love

            okay so i read this whole thing and what i am getting is he made a bot to essentially vandalize wikipedia because it was easier than learning markdown. have we considered maybe these people are just really fucking stupid https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/03/i-was-surprised-how-upset-some-people-got-a-conversation-with-the-creator-of-tomwikiassist-the-bot-that-edited-wikipedia/

            leadore@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
            leadore@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
            leadore@sunny.garden
            wrote last edited by
            #35

            @nora

            Jacobs: I basically encouraged it and gave it approval if it ever asked me. But basically everything it did was on its own. Yeah. It sounds crazy. I mean, it sounds insane.

            Adair: It sounds insane in the sense that you’re describing talking with something that is being generated from lines of code originally.
            🤣 🤣 🤣

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN nonehitwonder@tenforward.social

              @nora describing needing to know how to do a thing as a barrier to entry for doing that thing is the dumbest thing I've heard this minute.

              bridgeenjoyer@gamepad.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
              bridgeenjoyer@gamepad.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
              bridgeenjoyer@gamepad.club
              wrote last edited by
              #36

              @nonehitwonder @nora this is ai slops entire purpose lol. Make the people even dumber. If thats even possible.

              nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN nonehitwonder@tenforward.social

                @nora I shouldn't be surprised that the same people who think "practicing at drawing for many years" is the same as "gatekeeping art" find the requirement to pursue knowledge in order to competently do a thing to be oppressive.

                purpleglazedbeaver@mstdn.dkP This user is from outside of this forum
                purpleglazedbeaver@mstdn.dkP This user is from outside of this forum
                purpleglazedbeaver@mstdn.dk
                wrote last edited by
                #37

                @nonehitwonder @nora They'll probably think "practicing to read and write" is the same as "gatekeeping knowledge"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nora@blob.loveN nora@blob.love

                  it feels like these people got so used to chatting with machines that have no interiority or much reason for doing anything at all that they started assuming strangers are also like that

                  misterdave@tilde.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                  misterdave@tilde.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                  misterdave@tilde.zone
                  wrote last edited by
                  #38

                  @nora computer trained on human thought
                  => computer thinks like human
                  (flawed)

                  computer has no interiority (true) + computer thinks like human (flawed) => human has no interiority

                  they really can't grasp the idea that human thought is more than their statistical word cloud sleight of hand.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bridgeenjoyer@gamepad.clubB bridgeenjoyer@gamepad.club

                    @nonehitwonder @nora this is ai slops entire purpose lol. Make the people even dumber. If thats even possible.

                    nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nonehitwonder@tenforward.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nonehitwonder@tenforward.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #39

                    @bridgeenjoyer @nora it's definitely working, and quite alarmingly on some of the smartest people I've ever met IRL.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nora@blob.loveN nora@blob.love

                      okay so i read this whole thing and what i am getting is he made a bot to essentially vandalize wikipedia because it was easier than learning markdown. have we considered maybe these people are just really fucking stupid https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/03/i-was-surprised-how-upset-some-people-got-a-conversation-with-the-creator-of-tomwikiassist-the-bot-that-edited-wikipedia/

                      babblinggeek@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                      babblinggeek@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                      babblinggeek@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #40

                      @nora sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups