Mandatory tracking being proposed.
-
RE: https://flipboard.com/@cbcnews/ottawa-dpigmqdrz/-/a-D_0zMFpaTUyhkHd-k3EisA%3Aa%3A107108217-%2F0
Mandatory tracking being proposed. Even with guard rails, I'd rather not have that data be collected.
Also, can't they determine our locations already based on which cell towers you're connected to? Why is this needed?
New lawful access bill would give police, CSIS more powers to track suspects online | CBC News
The Liberal government has introduced a new lawful access bill that it says will help police and security services track and identify people who may be using tools like social media or artificial intelligence to commit crimes or threaten national security.
CBC (www.cbc.ca)
-
RE: https://flipboard.com/@cbcnews/ottawa-dpigmqdrz/-/a-D_0zMFpaTUyhkHd-k3EisA%3Aa%3A107108217-%2F0
Mandatory tracking being proposed. Even with guard rails, I'd rather not have that data be collected.
Also, can't they determine our locations already based on which cell towers you're connected to? Why is this needed?
New lawful access bill would give police, CSIS more powers to track suspects online | CBC News
The Liberal government has introduced a new lawful access bill that it says will help police and security services track and identify people who may be using tools like social media or artificial intelligence to commit crimes or threaten national security.
CBC (www.cbc.ca)
"Officials said that if CSIS wanted to track a terror suspect, for example, its agents are often forced to physically track them in person at great expense to the federal government, limiting how many operations they can undertake. "
GOOD. I'm all for doing my part and making sure Canadians are safe, but getting hard evidence SHOULD be hard and in real life. We can fake so much online now. Let's not make it easier to arrest people wrongly.
-
"Officials said that if CSIS wanted to track a terror suspect, for example, its agents are often forced to physically track them in person at great expense to the federal government, limiting how many operations they can undertake. "
GOOD. I'm all for doing my part and making sure Canadians are safe, but getting hard evidence SHOULD be hard and in real life. We can fake so much online now. Let's not make it easier to arrest people wrongly.
@quaff I swear every police argument for something they want is "without this it will be hard for us." It's fucking supposed to be hard. That's why it's call the burden of proof. Policing should never be pay to win.
-
E em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
RE: https://flipboard.com/@cbcnews/ottawa-dpigmqdrz/-/a-D_0zMFpaTUyhkHd-k3EisA%3Aa%3A107108217-%2F0
Mandatory tracking being proposed. Even with guard rails, I'd rather not have that data be collected.
Also, can't they determine our locations already based on which cell towers you're connected to? Why is this needed?
New lawful access bill would give police, CSIS more powers to track suspects online | CBC News
The Liberal government has introduced a new lawful access bill that it says will help police and security services track and identify people who may be using tools like social media or artificial intelligence to commit crimes or threaten national security.
CBC (www.cbc.ca)
@quaff the bleargh needs more control. MORE! MOAAAAR!!!
-
"Officials said that if CSIS wanted to track a terror suspect, for example, its agents are often forced to physically track them in person at great expense to the federal government, limiting how many operations they can undertake. "
GOOD. I'm all for doing my part and making sure Canadians are safe, but getting hard evidence SHOULD be hard and in real life. We can fake so much online now. Let's not make it easier to arrest people wrongly.
Why expect them to do their job of upholding the law when it’s easier to trample all over it?
Laws are more suggestions now and completely irrelevant if they can’t produce the quickest most profitable, desired result.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
