I swear to god I’m so fucking sick of AI
-
@danirabbit there are very few things in the world I am sick of as much as AI
@FinalGirl evangelical Christianity probably still top spot but they’re really duking it out
-
@FinalGirl evangelical Christianity probably still top spot but they’re really duking it out
-
@FinalGirl how do we convince the Christians that AI is a false idol or the mark of the beast or some shit. Can we weaponize the death cult against white supremacy somehow. How can we trick Christians into behaving ethically is essentially what I’m asking
-
I swear to god I’m so fucking sick of AI
@danirabbit I unfortunately have a dad who's too much into AI.
He's proud of his ChatGPT Premium subscription even when everyone else is cancelling it. He claims it's "useful." He even tells me to embrace AI slop.
He claimed Toontown Online will ruin my brain, yet AI is ruining his. -
I swear to god I’m so fucking sick of AI
RE: https://mas.to/@yith/116179723212609666
I read your post
just as my partner was showing me this post 
-
@FinalGirl evangelical Christianity probably still top spot but they’re really duking it out
@danirabbit @FinalGirl Given the recent news of ChatICBM teaming up with the bombing-for-Jesus wing of the US military, I don’t think they’re fighting each other as much as I’d like…
-
I swear to god I’m so fucking sick of AI
-
I swear to god I’m so fucking sick of AI
@danirabbit I am deeply concerned that companies wielding Large Language Models (LLMs) are siphoning away the collective intelligence of humanity. Every conversation we have, every creative spark we discuss, is ultimately fed into these models—word by word, delivered directly to these tech giants. Yet, these corporations never truly commit to not retaining your ideas. They are, in essence, absorbing your creativity. Is this logic sound? Is this our current reality?
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
@danirabbit I am deeply concerned that companies wielding Large Language Models (LLMs) are siphoning away the collective intelligence of humanity. Every conversation we have, every creative spark we discuss, is ultimately fed into these models—word by word, delivered directly to these tech giants. Yet, these corporations never truly commit to not retaining your ideas. They are, in essence, absorbing your creativity. Is this logic sound? Is this our current reality?
@LucasAegis@infosec.exchange @danirabbit@mastodon.online absorbing creativity implies that it is a finite resource which depletes when someone... experiences it? which is obviously wrong
as bad as LLMs and tech companies are, humans won't stop doing creative stuff just because someone or something takes in those ideas, people make creative things for unrelated reasons tbh -
@LucasAegis@infosec.exchange @danirabbit@mastodon.online absorbing creativity implies that it is a finite resource which depletes when someone... experiences it? which is obviously wrong
as bad as LLMs and tech companies are, humans won't stop doing creative stuff just because someone or something takes in those ideas, people make creative things for unrelated reasons tbh@froge @danirabbit You missed my point. I’m not saying human creativity is a finite resource that 'depletes.' I’m saying that when you interface with a cloud-based LLM, your specific, private ideas are leaked and harvested without consent or compensation. The tech giants provide zero guarantees of confidentiality. It’s not about creativity running out; it’s about the systemic extraction of individual intellectual property. My spark doesn't die, but the company shouldn't get to own it just because I used their tool.
