Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. At #RealWorldCrypto this year, there was a session on "privacy-enhancing technologies".

At #RealWorldCrypto this year, there was a session on "privacy-enhancing technologies".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
realworldcrypto
15 Posts 7 Posters 20 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • soatok@furry.engineerS soatok@furry.engineer

    At an earlier track, one of the invited speakers suggested using Fully Homomorphic Encryption to allow folks to have private conversations with an AI chatbot for therapy.

    My mind was instantly filled with news stories of OpenAI and self-harm. Lawsuits from grieving families.

    Are they deeply out of touch?

    Or was it just "hmm, what do people want privacy for? I'll just throw a bunch of hypothetical examples of things FHE would be good for without interrogating them deeply"?

    macbraughton@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    macbraughton@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    macbraughton@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @soatok my first read of this was “Homophobic Encryption” and I was like, what the hell is that… I don’t know what Homomorphic Encryption is either though

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • soatok@furry.engineerS soatok@furry.engineer

      At an earlier track, one of the invited speakers suggested using Fully Homomorphic Encryption to allow folks to have private conversations with an AI chatbot for therapy.

      My mind was instantly filled with news stories of OpenAI and self-harm. Lawsuits from grieving families.

      Are they deeply out of touch?

      Or was it just "hmm, what do people want privacy for? I'll just throw a bunch of hypothetical examples of things FHE would be good for without interrogating them deeply"?

      soatok@furry.engineerS This user is from outside of this forum
      soatok@furry.engineerS This user is from outside of this forum
      soatok@furry.engineer
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      During the coffee breaks and dinner conversations, everyone I talked to about these things echoed my frustrations.

      In 2024, a speaker from Intuit spoke about their distributed key generation protocol. It involved multiplying a number by a hash. They did not elaborate on whether that's just a bigint operation or an elliptic curve group operation. @sophieschmieg was like, "Why would they do that? What if they set it to zero?" and the backchatter was full of "Why are the tax people rolling their own crypto?"

      So, like, I'm not super worried about adtech rotting the RWC community.

      soatok@furry.engineerS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • soatok@furry.engineerS soatok@furry.engineer

        During the coffee breaks and dinner conversations, everyone I talked to about these things echoed my frustrations.

        In 2024, a speaker from Intuit spoke about their distributed key generation protocol. It involved multiplying a number by a hash. They did not elaborate on whether that's just a bigint operation or an elliptic curve group operation. @sophieschmieg was like, "Why would they do that? What if they set it to zero?" and the backchatter was full of "Why are the tax people rolling their own crypto?"

        So, like, I'm not super worried about adtech rotting the RWC community.

        soatok@furry.engineerS This user is from outside of this forum
        soatok@furry.engineerS This user is from outside of this forum
        soatok@furry.engineer
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        Last thing: When I said "No" is a Privacy-Enhancing Technology, I didn't just mean an opt-out.

        I mean the engineers growing a fucking spine and telling their boss, "No, we shouldn't collect this data in the first place."

        wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW whyrl@furry.engineerW 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        0
        • soatok@furry.engineerS soatok@furry.engineer

          Last thing: When I said "No" is a Privacy-Enhancing Technology, I didn't just mean an opt-out.

          I mean the engineers growing a fucking spine and telling their boss, "No, we shouldn't collect this data in the first place."

          wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
          wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
          wordshaper@weatherishappening.network
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @soatok and you can even pronounce that “no” like “the ROI on collecting that data is negative” because it is for basically everyone. The suits often need you to speak with an accent that way so they can hear you clearly.

          kusuriya@masto.hackers.townK 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW wordshaper@weatherishappening.network

            @soatok and you can even pronounce that “no” like “the ROI on collecting that data is negative” because it is for basically everyone. The suits often need you to speak with an accent that way so they can hear you clearly.

            kusuriya@masto.hackers.townK This user is from outside of this forum
            kusuriya@masto.hackers.townK This user is from outside of this forum
            kusuriya@masto.hackers.town
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @wordshaper @soatok but it isn't negative ROI otherwise business would treat privacy invading tech like the toxic waste it should be. But with a bit of work that dream could become reality.

            wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • kusuriya@masto.hackers.townK kusuriya@masto.hackers.town

              @wordshaper @soatok but it isn't negative ROI otherwise business would treat privacy invading tech like the toxic waste it should be. But with a bit of work that dream could become reality.

              wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
              wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
              wordshaper@weatherishappening.network
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @kusuriya @soatok oh, it absolutely is a negative ROI, it’s just that often businesses don’t properly account for the costs so don’t realize. There’s the cost to develop the data gathering, the network bandwidth to transmit the data, the storage and backup costs, the maintenance costs, the costs to do data analysis, the compliance costs, and the costs associated with responding to subpoenas.

              The return is the impression of better targeting, which when analyzed for most businesses is… very small

              wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW wordshaper@weatherishappening.network

                @kusuriya @soatok oh, it absolutely is a negative ROI, it’s just that often businesses don’t properly account for the costs so don’t realize. There’s the cost to develop the data gathering, the network bandwidth to transmit the data, the storage and backup costs, the maintenance costs, the costs to do data analysis, the compliance costs, and the costs associated with responding to subpoenas.

                The return is the impression of better targeting, which when analyzed for most businesses is… very small

                wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
                wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
                wordshaper@weatherishappening.network
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @kusuriya @soatok it’s common knowledge that you get better returns from better targeting, and like for many things that are common knowledge it turns out to be wrong — the return on better targeting of ads is very often zero.

                Then there’s the opportunity cost, because you could have had all those people and resources dedicated to actually doing what your business does, which is rarely actually data gathering.

                mkj@social.mkj.earthM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW wordshaper@weatherishappening.network

                  @kusuriya @soatok it’s common knowledge that you get better returns from better targeting, and like for many things that are common knowledge it turns out to be wrong — the return on better targeting of ads is very often zero.

                  Then there’s the opportunity cost, because you could have had all those people and resources dedicated to actually doing what your business does, which is rarely actually data gathering.

                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mkj@social.mkj.earth
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @wordshaper There is also the issue of a fairly small but often *very* vocal and knowledgeable minority who won't hesitate to raise *hell* about companies collecting more data than necessary. **Especially** if that data collection is also undisclosed.

                  @kusuriya @soatok

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                  • soatok@furry.engineerS soatok@furry.engineer

                    Last thing: When I said "No" is a Privacy-Enhancing Technology, I didn't just mean an opt-out.

                    I mean the engineers growing a fucking spine and telling their boss, "No, we shouldn't collect this data in the first place."

                    whyrl@furry.engineerW This user is from outside of this forum
                    whyrl@furry.engineerW This user is from outside of this forum
                    whyrl@furry.engineer
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @soatok When your only tool is a KPI, everything looks like a metric.

                    futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • whyrl@furry.engineerW whyrl@furry.engineer

                      @soatok When your only tool is a KPI, everything looks like a metric.

                      futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                      futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                      futuristicrobert@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @whyrl @soatok ah yes.

                      This is why cybersecurity teams consistently have to fight for budgeting. Security tools do not produce profit.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups