Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I don't think it's possible to get "mainstream communities" away from Discord to any open alternative.

I don't think it's possible to get "mainstream communities" away from Discord to any open alternative.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
6 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV This user is from outside of this forum
    volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV This user is from outside of this forum
    volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I don't think it's possible to get "mainstream communities" away from Discord to any open alternative. Not after they got a taste of maximal convenience.

    For forums to make a comeback, they'd have to reach the same level of convenience. People would like to have a single account which allows them to browse forums and use them without having to register over and over again. People who want to run a community shouldn't be required to have technical knowledge about how to host a forum software. And of course, things generally shouldn't be janky.

    Those are the minimal requirements which are only viable if a single huge provider runs the show.

    kura@hai.z0ne.socialK volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip

      I don't think it's possible to get "mainstream communities" away from Discord to any open alternative. Not after they got a taste of maximal convenience.

      For forums to make a comeback, they'd have to reach the same level of convenience. People would like to have a single account which allows them to browse forums and use them without having to register over and over again. People who want to run a community shouldn't be required to have technical knowledge about how to host a forum software. And of course, things generally shouldn't be janky.

      Those are the minimal requirements which are only viable if a single huge provider runs the show.

      kura@hai.z0ne.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kura@hai.z0ne.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kura@hai.z0ne.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip
      NodeBB supports activity pub in its current indev version, see
      https://docs.nodebb.org/activitypub/

      So I think this is a step in the right direction. (Plus NodeBB is pretty nice IMO)

      But I get what you mean.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip

        I don't think it's possible to get "mainstream communities" away from Discord to any open alternative. Not after they got a taste of maximal convenience.

        For forums to make a comeback, they'd have to reach the same level of convenience. People would like to have a single account which allows them to browse forums and use them without having to register over and over again. People who want to run a community shouldn't be required to have technical knowledge about how to host a forum software. And of course, things generally shouldn't be janky.

        Those are the minimal requirements which are only viable if a single huge provider runs the show.

        volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV This user is from outside of this forum
        volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV This user is from outside of this forum
        volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Federation isn't a solution because it adds the requirement to know how to host an instance. Delegating the hosting to providers defeats the purpose of decentralization. True federation like here is janky. Bluesky-style federation suffers centralization of power.

        kura@hai.z0ne.socialK anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip

          Federation isn't a solution because it adds the requirement to know how to host an instance. Delegating the hosting to providers defeats the purpose of decentralization. True federation like here is janky. Bluesky-style federation suffers centralization of power.

          kura@hai.z0ne.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kura@hai.z0ne.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kura@hai.z0ne.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip You just wanted to shoot me, didnt you?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip

            I don't think it's possible to get "mainstream communities" away from Discord to any open alternative. Not after they got a taste of maximal convenience.

            For forums to make a comeback, they'd have to reach the same level of convenience. People would like to have a single account which allows them to browse forums and use them without having to register over and over again. People who want to run a community shouldn't be required to have technical knowledge about how to host a forum software. And of course, things generally shouldn't be janky.

            Those are the minimal requirements which are only viable if a single huge provider runs the show.

            volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV This user is from outside of this forum
            volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV This user is from outside of this forum
            volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Guys, stop telling me Discord is janky. Maybe it is, I don't know, but surely not in the "different people only see different subsets of posts" kind of way like we got going here 😭

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip

              Federation isn't a solution because it adds the requirement to know how to host an instance. Delegating the hosting to providers defeats the purpose of decentralization. True federation like here is janky. Bluesky-style federation suffers centralization of power.

              anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
              anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
              anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @volpeon you don't have to know how to host for federation to work though 🤔 being able to self-host is just an added benefit.

              I think Fediverse does it pretty well because you can interact with everyone and everything across every instance with your single account, we just need a better onboarding process and softwares that are more familiar for people.

              In the end tho, I think Eugen said it well, it's not so much the convenience as "if everyone used smoke signals, that's where everyone'd stay"

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups