xml stands for excellent markup language

[mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.eu]

@lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place @aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORWAY

[aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@lritter no. yaml is for startups who made technlology decisions based on passing fads in the 2010s and will only be free from their enormous pile of technical debt when they fail to IPO and the investors send them to a farm up state

[aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@lritter xml is for lovers

[lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@aeva no! only sx is good

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@unlofl @aeva also XHTML2 has some glorious features.

[aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@lritter ... what does the tld for Sint Maarten have anything to do with this

[lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@aeva https://git.sr.ht/~duangle/sxpp/tree/master/item/doc/syntax.md

[photex@icosahedron.website]

@lritter @aeva *gasp* that’s slander. XML got a bad rap because of abuse by the Java community. XML is the one true markup.

[lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@photex @aeva i wrote enough XSLT in my life to claim the right to reject xml passionately. it was a nullbrained idea

[photex@icosahedron.website]

@lritter @aeva I would never deny your trauma or right to heal in your own time. Peace be with you and may you never be forced to write software for the enterprise again.

[thehole@dasforum.org]

@aeva
oh no, I always thought it stood for "excellent, my love".
Now I understand why I was always given weird looks, when I told that to my love when something good happened!

[lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@photex @aeva for the record yaml is no better (it's over-engineered).

i can really only stand s-expressions these days.

[aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@thehole no no, now it stands for "excellent, my love"