I don't know who needs to hear this, but if you're yelling at a person on Fedi for not using #AltText, stop.
-
-
-
-
-
@alice @altbot And yet, I think this is a problem too. You're one step short from "should you be a dick to anyone who ever boosted a post without alt-text? yes!" style guilt by association.
IMHO not having alt-text should be a factor to consider before boosting a post, but it should not be an outright disqualifier. And if one does feel the need to boost it, that would then be a good chance to bring up https://github.com/micr0-dev/AltBot
@divVerent did I ever imply you should be anything other than kind and inclusive to humans?
-
I don't know who needs to hear this, but if you're yelling at a person on Fedi for not using #AltText, stop. Please.
Should you use alt-text? Yes!
Should you boost posts without alt-text? No!
Should you yell at companies and bots who don't use alt-text? Fuck yeah!
Should you try your best to make Fedi a more accessible, and safe place for everyone—including those who have trouble writing alt-text? Of course.
Should you mention @altbot or #Alt4Me *occasionally* so folx know they're both wonderful tools that can help make Fedi a more inclusive place? It would be impolite not to.
But—and let me make this clear—don't be a dick to folx who forget alt-text, or who have trouble writing it for whatever reason; it's not very punk of you.
@alice I just occasionally whine at people posting without alt text when my mobile reception is bad and images don’t load.
-
@fgbjr because being unreasonable never made anything better
️ -
-
@fgbjr because being unreasonable never made anything better
️@alice Two things can be true!
/s -
@alice At least once have I just not posted something because describing the image in any meaningful way would've been quite a task.
Though nowadays I'll post it anyway, perhaps I should call in helpers in those cases in the future.Getting yelled at for not being able to do something definitely pushes people away.
@JoureiAt least once have I just not posted something because describing the image in any meaningful way would've been quite a task.
Though nowadays I'll post it anyway, perhaps I should call in helpers in those cases in the future.
I could post lots of pictures that I've made myself, maybe several a week. Instead, I haven't posted any since mid-2024.
I, too, refuse to post any image that doesn't have descriptions (two of them for each one of my original images) which are up to my own constantly rising standards. But these standards mean that even a fairly simple image may require several hours to one or two days to describe and explain.
In fact, I have been working on the descriptions of a series of avatar portraits for about a year and a half. So far, only the common preamble for four images and the individual long description for one of them are written. Distilling an optimal alt-text from them will be difficult because recent discoveries had me lower my personal alt-text character limit from 1,500 to 512, and I haven't even managed to put one together that doesn't exceed 1,500 characters.
And that's for avatar portraits with a neutral white background. Imagine the effort necessary for a landscape or a cityscape or something like that. So much about it being done in 10 seconds.
I recall finding a beautifully built, highly detailed harbour scene. It didn't even have anything in it that'd trigger anyone, I guess, so I deemed it safe enough to post. But I found it outright impossible to properly describe within a reasonable amount of time and with a reasonable effort. I ended up choosing a much different scene that still ended up taking me two full days to describe in the long description plus the morning of the third day to write an alt-text.
To be honest, I avoid having certain elements in my pictures now, such as vehicles and buildings unless they're very simple.
CC: @
🅻🅸🅲🅴 (
)
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #ImageDescription #ImageDescriptions #ImageDescriptionMeta #CWImageDescriptionMeta -
Basically telling other people how they should be using Mastodon is not cool unless they are violating some instance rule.
You always have the option of muting them or blocking them so you don't have to endure whatever offense you perceive they are perpetrating.
Now, fully realize telling people not to tell people how to use Mastodon is kind of telling people how to use Mastodon. So it's a conundrum, but generally agree with Alice. Please don't be a Mastodon HOA enforcer.
@mastodonmigration @alice @altbot "fully realize telling people not to tell people how to use Mastodon is kind of telling people how to use Mastodon". No, it's common sense. No more paradox here than in saying everyone should be free to do as they please. Of course there's more to social life than such minimalistic wisdom but telling people what they should say and how they should say it is clearly no the best way to start a conversation between equals.
-
@alice Two things can be true!
/s@fgbjr I'd wager that number is significantly higher
-
@Jourei
At least once have I just not posted something because describing the image in any meaningful way would've been quite a task.
Though nowadays I'll post it anyway, perhaps I should call in helpers in those cases in the future.
I could post lots of pictures that I've made myself, maybe several a week. Instead, I haven't posted any since mid-2024.
I, too, refuse to post any image that doesn't have descriptions (two of them for each one of my original images) which are up to my own constantly rising standards. But these standards mean that even a fairly simple image may require several hours to one or two days to describe and explain.
In fact, I have been working on the descriptions of a series of avatar portraits for about a year and a half. So far, only the common preamble for four images and the individual long description for one of them are written. Distilling an optimal alt-text from them will be difficult because recent discoveries had me lower my personal alt-text character limit from 1,500 to 512, and I haven't even managed to put one together that doesn't exceed 1,500 characters.
And that's for avatar portraits with a neutral white background. Imagine the effort necessary for a landscape or a cityscape or something like that. So much about it being done in 10 seconds.
I recall finding a beautifully built, highly detailed harbour scene. It didn't even have anything in it that'd trigger anyone, I guess, so I deemed it safe enough to post. But I found it outright impossible to properly describe within a reasonable amount of time and with a reasonable effort. I ended up choosing a much different scene that still ended up taking me two full days to describe in the long description plus the morning of the third day to write an alt-text.
To be honest, I avoid having certain elements in my pictures now, such as vehicles and buildings unless they're very simple.
CC: @🅻🅸🅲🅴 ()
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #ImageDescription #ImageDescriptions #ImageDescriptionMeta #CWImageDescriptionMetai always alt text but i never write novels
"a skiff on choppy waters with dark clouds in the distance"
it's fine
if you're going to hold yourself to the standard of transmitting the transcendental of an image, i think you're going too hard on yourself
the issue before us is accessibility. that's a fine and noble goal. more lofty goals may be pursued by some, and that's going above and beyond and is laudatory
but it's nothing that can be called a standard of behavior
-
@benroyce @alice @alexadeswift
Did we just become best friends.mp4
-
Basically telling other people how they should be using Mastodon is not cool unless they are violating some instance rule.
You always have the option of muting them or blocking them so you don't have to endure whatever offense you perceive they are perpetrating.
Now, fully realize telling people not to tell people how to use Mastodon is kind of telling people how to use Mastodon. So it's a conundrum, but generally agree with Alice. Please don't be a Mastodon HOA enforcer.
@Mastodon MigrationBasically telling other people how they should be using Mastodon is not cool unless they are violating some instance rule.
As, by the way, is telling Fediverse users who are not on Mastodon to use whatever they use instead like Mastodon users are expected to use Mastodon.Please don't be a Mastodon HOA enforcer.
Especially since the alt-text police of the Mastodon HOA have much higher alt-text and image description minimum standards than blind or visually-impaired people. And they seem to be raising their standards further and further.
I always try my best to be way ahead of anyone's image description minimum standards, also in order to demonstrate to the Mastodon HOA that I'm not a lazy bum, and that I do try hard to describe my images properly. For my own original images, this means that I have to describe each one of them twice, with a fairly short description in the alt-text and a much longer one in the post itself.
This, however, clashes with the Mastodon HOA, too, because they also enforce Mastodon's default 500-character limit Fediverse-wide by generously blocking everyone whom they catch exceeding it at first strike.
CC: @🅻🅸🅲🅴 ()
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #CharacterLimit #CharacterLimits #CharacterLimitMeta #CWCharacterLimitMeta #500Characters #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #ImageDescription #ImageDescriptions #ImageDescriptionMeta #CWImageDescriptionMeta #AltTextPolice #MastodonHOA -
I don't know who needs to hear this, but if you're yelling at a person on Fedi for not using #AltText, stop. Please.
Should you use alt-text? Yes!
Should you boost posts without alt-text? No!
Should you yell at companies and bots who don't use alt-text? Fuck yeah!
Should you try your best to make Fedi a more accessible, and safe place for everyone—including those who have trouble writing alt-text? Of course.
Should you mention @altbot or #Alt4Me *occasionally* so folx know they're both wonderful tools that can help make Fedi a more inclusive place? It would be impolite not to.
But—and let me make this clear—don't be a dick to folx who forget alt-text, or who have trouble writing it for whatever reason; it's not very punk of you.
-
@divVerent did I ever imply you should be anything other than kind and inclusive to humans?
@alice Sorry, I probably misunderstood you. I thought you were putting down a clear rule to never, ever hit the boost button on a post without alt-text, or one is a super horrible bad person nobody ever should be 100 kilometers within. That is going too far for me; instead, I would weigh the factors:
- Is it worth boosting _despite_ lacking alt text?
- Is the image even important to the message?
- Will I respond anyway (in which case I can e.g. put sufficient text to explain the image while at it).So basically I do not think this should be a cold hard rule like the others in your list seem to be. Can we maybe agree that you actually meant all those more in the sense of RFC 2119:
3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
carefully weighed before choosing a different course.In that case, of course, my entire objection is moot.
-
@benroyce @alice @alexadeswift
Did we just become best friends.mp4
@miclgael @alice @alexadeswift
no best friends happens after we trade 4 barbed withering insults then smile in appreciation and pat each other on the back
-
@Jourei
At least once have I just not posted something because describing the image in any meaningful way would've been quite a task.
Though nowadays I'll post it anyway, perhaps I should call in helpers in those cases in the future.
I could post lots of pictures that I've made myself, maybe several a week. Instead, I haven't posted any since mid-2024.
I, too, refuse to post any image that doesn't have descriptions (two of them for each one of my original images) which are up to my own constantly rising standards. But these standards mean that even a fairly simple image may require several hours to one or two days to describe and explain.
In fact, I have been working on the descriptions of a series of avatar portraits for about a year and a half. So far, only the common preamble for four images and the individual long description for one of them are written. Distilling an optimal alt-text from them will be difficult because recent discoveries had me lower my personal alt-text character limit from 1,500 to 512, and I haven't even managed to put one together that doesn't exceed 1,500 characters.
And that's for avatar portraits with a neutral white background. Imagine the effort necessary for a landscape or a cityscape or something like that. So much about it being done in 10 seconds.
I recall finding a beautifully built, highly detailed harbour scene. It didn't even have anything in it that'd trigger anyone, I guess, so I deemed it safe enough to post. But I found it outright impossible to properly describe within a reasonable amount of time and with a reasonable effort. I ended up choosing a much different scene that still ended up taking me two full days to describe in the long description plus the morning of the third day to write an alt-text.
To be honest, I avoid having certain elements in my pictures now, such as vehicles and buildings unless they're very simple.
CC: @🅻🅸🅲🅴 ()
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #ImageDescription #ImageDescriptions #ImageDescriptionMeta #CWImageDescriptionMeta@jupiter_rowland that seems...excessive.
Like, I regularly get shout-outs from @alttexthalloffame, and folx in the @AltAfterDark community for my alt-text, and it rarely exceeds a few paragraphs (if I'm going full-on #AccessibilityIsHotAF and posting an erotic short story as alt-text). Normally it's only a few sentences, tops—enough for folx to experience the relevant parts and vibe of the image.
-
@miclgael @alice @alexadeswift
no best friends happens after we trade 4 barbed withering insults then smile in appreciation and pat each other on the back
@benroyce @alice @alexadeswift
Yeah? Well - nice avatar and I love seeing your toots come up on my timeline
