Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Retail sales in the US post their biggest gain in 3 years driven by the rise in fuel prices.

Retail sales in the US post their biggest gain in 3 years driven by the rise in fuel prices.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
6 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • newsguyusa@flipboard.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    newsguyusa@flipboard.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    newsguyusa@flipboard.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Retail sales in the US post their biggest gain in 3 years driven by the rise in fuel prices. https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts_current.pdf

    fu@hostux.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • dacmot@sunny.gardenD This user is from outside of this forum
      dacmot@sunny.gardenD This user is from outside of this forum
      dacmot@sunny.garden
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @liquor_american maybe there a language nuance I'm not getting... How can retail sales *gains* be driven by fuel prices (increasing)? Shouldn't it be the opposite?

      @newsguyusa

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • newsguyusa@flipboard.socialN newsguyusa@flipboard.social

        Retail sales in the US post their biggest gain in 3 years driven by the rise in fuel prices. https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts_current.pdf

        fu@hostux.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        fu@hostux.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        fu@hostux.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @newsguyusa that's not how this is supposed to work

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dacmot@sunny.gardenD dacmot@sunny.garden

          @liquor_american maybe there a language nuance I'm not getting... How can retail sales *gains* be driven by fuel prices (increasing)? Shouldn't it be the opposite?

          @newsguyusa

          M This user is from outside of this forum
          M This user is from outside of this forum
          mweiss@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @dacmot @liquor_american @newsguyusa because it's measured in gross nominal dollars, not net profit or unit counts. The number of units may be flat or even down, but the total number of dollars spent is up.

          dacmot@sunny.gardenD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M mweiss@infosec.exchange

            @dacmot @liquor_american @newsguyusa because it's measured in gross nominal dollars, not net profit or unit counts. The number of units may be flat or even down, but the total number of dollars spent is up.

            dacmot@sunny.gardenD This user is from outside of this forum
            dacmot@sunny.gardenD This user is from outside of this forum
            dacmot@sunny.garden
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @mweiss thanks for the explanation. So could be a misleading positive spin; people are spending more but presumably getting less. And are they spending more out of necessity, possibly increasing debt, or are they more confident in the economy?

            @liquor_american @newsguyusa

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dacmot@sunny.gardenD dacmot@sunny.garden

              @mweiss thanks for the explanation. So could be a misleading positive spin; people are spending more but presumably getting less. And are they spending more out of necessity, possibly increasing debt, or are they more confident in the economy?

              @liquor_american @newsguyusa

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              mweiss@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @dacmot @liquor_american @newsguyusa odds are really slim about it being from increased confidence. More likely out of necessity. Energy-based inflation typically reduces elastic spending, so the underlying signal here is a suggestion that most elastic spending was already down near minima and didn't have further room to drop.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups