Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year.

I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 23 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

    I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

    So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

    jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jalefkowit@vmst.io
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @cwebber From management’s perspective, the problem with cheap junior engineers is that they eventually become less cheap senior engineers. Whereas the AI will be a cheap junior engineer forever

    cwebber@social.coopC slothrop@chaos.socialS dukeboitans@mas.toD 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

      @cwebber From management’s perspective, the problem with cheap junior engineers is that they eventually become less cheap senior engineers. Whereas the AI will be a cheap junior engineer forever

      cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cwebber@social.coop
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @jalefkowit But right now the story is also "we need senior engineers to monitor the AIs"

      jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

        @cwebber From management’s perspective, the problem with cheap junior engineers is that they eventually become less cheap senior engineers. Whereas the AI will be a cheap junior engineer forever

        slothrop@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        slothrop@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        slothrop@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @jalefkowit @cwebber At least until the market consolidation sets in, at which point companies will realize that hooo boy rebuilding a talent pipeline from scratch is EXPENSIVE

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

          I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

          So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

          masukomi@connectified.comM This user is from outside of this forum
          masukomi@connectified.comM This user is from outside of this forum
          masukomi@connectified.com
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @cwebber Yes! this! 100% this. The junior will at least build up institutional and domain knowledge and get better every year & can use their own 🧠 to help guide choices instead of blindly doing what's asked even if it'll make things worse.

          PLUS you get to feel good about giving someone insurance and a house and food.

          there's NO downside.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

            @jalefkowit But right now the story is also "we need senior engineers to monitor the AIs"

            jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jalefkowit@vmst.io
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @cwebber Not a problem. Senior engineers spring fully formed from the thigh of Zeus

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

              I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

              So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @cwebber This is one of the key thresholds I've been waiting for, when per head token spend reaches parity with engineer salary. Sounds like we're about there.

              It's also been my best guess for when we might start seeing a bit more self-reflection of what we're doing. Or I'm wrong and we'll blow past it.

              mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD dvshkn@social.treehouse.systems

                @cwebber This is one of the key thresholds I've been waiting for, when per head token spend reaches parity with engineer salary. Sounds like we're about there.

                It's also been my best guess for when we might start seeing a bit more self-reflection of what we're doing. Or I'm wrong and we'll blow past it.

                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @dvshkn @cwebber I mean, we know the "why" here, and it's of course ghoulish.

                To say what I'm sure is understood, a FTE's cost to a company is not measured by salary or benefits alone. And therein lies the value proposition for the corpos—assuming they haven't also bought into the propaganda about the models' capabilities, in which case they not only believe they are cheaper than you, but better.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

                  @cwebber From management’s perspective, the problem with cheap junior engineers is that they eventually become less cheap senior engineers. Whereas the AI will be a cheap junior engineer forever

                  dukeboitans@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dukeboitans@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dukeboitans@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @jalefkowit @cwebber Isn't AI-as-a-service heavily subsidised at the moment though? This can't go on forever.

                  kyonshi@dice.campK 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                    So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                    mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mike@thecanadian.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @cwebber I'm not advocating replacing humans but I think the business case would be that an AI doesn't sleep, eat, take breaks, get sick, go on holiday or require a raise every year. Also an employer pays more than your salary, the line item for a human resource is salary plus payroll tax, and benefits. so it's usually your gross salary plus 30%.
                    I really do get where you're coming from though. AI should be a force multiplier not an excuse to layoff staff.

                    cargot_robbie@urbanists.socialC n1xnx@tilde.zoneN 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                      I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                      So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                      technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                      technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                      technomancy@hey.hagelb.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @cwebber I think you know the answer here, because it's not that they're paying for code to be produced; the CTO is paying for bragging rights so he can proudly trumpet their adoption numbers to anyone within earshot at all the cool CTO parties he goes to

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                        I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                        So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                        kyonshi@dice.campK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kyonshi@dice.campK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kyonshi@dice.camp
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @cwebber because that would mean spending money on wages and companies are forbidden by their religion to do so

                        gurre@mastodon.nuG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dukeboitans@mas.toD dukeboitans@mas.to

                          @jalefkowit @cwebber Isn't AI-as-a-service heavily subsidised at the moment though? This can't go on forever.

                          kyonshi@dice.campK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kyonshi@dice.campK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kyonshi@dice.camp
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @dukeboitans @jalefkowit @cwebber no you need to understand, the genius is that taxpayer money the AI companies get is partially spent to line the pockets of the people deciding on subsidies. they can keep that up for as long as it takes

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • kyonshi@dice.campK kyonshi@dice.camp

                            @cwebber because that would mean spending money on wages and companies are forbidden by their religion to do so

                            gurre@mastodon.nuG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gurre@mastodon.nuG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gurre@mastodon.nu
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @kyonshi @cwebber
                            It is 100% this. This is why corporate leaders love AI: they resent having employees.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                              (And note that *each engineer* at the org has a budget for token spend that's equivalent to what I make in a year)

                              aeva@mastodon.gamedev.placeA This user is from outside of this forum
                              aeva@mastodon.gamedev.placeA This user is from outside of this forum
                              aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @cwebber i bet that's completely sustainable and will last forever

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mike@thecanadian.socialM mike@thecanadian.social

                                @cwebber I'm not advocating replacing humans but I think the business case would be that an AI doesn't sleep, eat, take breaks, get sick, go on holiday or require a raise every year. Also an employer pays more than your salary, the line item for a human resource is salary plus payroll tax, and benefits. so it's usually your gross salary plus 30%.
                                I really do get where you're coming from though. AI should be a force multiplier not an excuse to layoff staff.

                                cargot_robbie@urbanists.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cargot_robbie@urbanists.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cargot_robbie@urbanists.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @mike Is it true that AI won't require a raise every year? I wouldn't be surprised that executives would think that, but it seems like token price inflation would be a lot harder for companies to mitigate than it has been for them to suppress wages. AI has the whole multi-billion dollar company apparatus behind it, most employees are lucky if they can afford an employment lawyer to read their contracts.

                                @cwebber

                                mike@thecanadian.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cargot_robbie@urbanists.socialC cargot_robbie@urbanists.social

                                  @mike Is it true that AI won't require a raise every year? I wouldn't be surprised that executives would think that, but it seems like token price inflation would be a lot harder for companies to mitigate than it has been for them to suppress wages. AI has the whole multi-billion dollar company apparatus behind it, most employees are lucky if they can afford an employment lawyer to read their contracts.

                                  @cwebber

                                  mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mike@thecanadian.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @cargot_robbie @cwebber Fair point

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mike@thecanadian.socialM mike@thecanadian.social

                                    @cwebber I'm not advocating replacing humans but I think the business case would be that an AI doesn't sleep, eat, take breaks, get sick, go on holiday or require a raise every year. Also an employer pays more than your salary, the line item for a human resource is salary plus payroll tax, and benefits. so it's usually your gross salary plus 30%.
                                    I really do get where you're coming from though. AI should be a force multiplier not an excuse to layoff staff.

                                    n1xnx@tilde.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    n1xnx@tilde.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    n1xnx@tilde.zone
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @mike @cwebber
                                    Of course, the OTHER thing AI doesn't do is learn from its mistakes (that humans had to clean up after).

                                    mike@thecanadian.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • n1xnx@tilde.zoneN n1xnx@tilde.zone

                                      @mike @cwebber
                                      Of course, the OTHER thing AI doesn't do is learn from its mistakes (that humans had to clean up after).

                                      mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mike@thecanadian.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @n1xnx @cwebber Actually that is somewhat debatable. The models do accept training and do by definition learn. Do they learn like humans? Probably not.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                        I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                                        So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                                        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        npars01@mstdn.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @cwebber

                                        AI isn't funded by the fossil fuel industry for its revenue or ROI (return on investment).

                                        AI initiatives exist to launder fossil fuel money for corrupt petrostate despots.
                                        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/technology/saudi-arabia-ai-exporter.html

                                        AI initiatives exist to burn more fossil fuel, wastefully.
                                        https://www.wired.com/story/trump-energy-industry-ai-fossil-fuels-pittsburgh-summit/

                                        There's also the chokepoint capitalism, electricity rate surge, state surveillance, election meddling, wage suppression, price fixing, predatory pricing, rent fixing, & automated warfare.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                          I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                                          So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                                          a2_4am@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          a2_4am@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          a2_4am@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @cwebber Tokens don't unionize

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups