I'm building a list of #slopfree software projects to help developers, businesses and software users make choices about their software usage.

[swannodette@mas.to]

@sitcom_nemesis yeah sorry I meant GPL projects who've assigned copyright to FSF, the governance bit!

[sitcom_nemesis@tech.lgbt]

@swannodette Assigned copyright to FSF? What do you mean?

[swannodette@mas.to]

@sitcom_nemesis https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/FSF-copyright-handling - and FSF governs what is permissible https://lwn.net/Articles/1040888/

[navi@social.vlhl.dev]

@sitcom_nemesis https://social.vlhl.dev/notice/B411aV3FER9OzhAx3Q

a few more (plus one more in the reply to that)

[kjv@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@sitcom_nemesis

Add love2d to the list
https://social.nouveau.community/@andnull/116189271962485826

[swannodette@mas.to]

@sitcom_nemesis you should add Clojure and all of its core libraries see https://gist.github.com/richhickey/ea94e3741ff0a4e3af55b9fe6287887f - all core libs assign copyright to him and he's not going to accept LLM code https://github.com/clojure

[kris@todon.eu]

@sitcom_nemesis https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig#strict-no-llm-no-ai-policy

[srtcd424@mas.to]

@sitcom_nemesis might be worth talking to @the about their No-AI list? https://noai.starlightnet.work Would be a shame to duplicate effort!

[alexia@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@srtcd424 @the @sitcom_nemesis I'd be down!

[zerodogg@hachyderm.io]

@sitcom_nemesis https://migrainelog.zerodogg.org

( https://gitlab.com/mglog/org.zerodogg.migraineLog/-/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md?ref_type=heads#use-of-generative-ai )

[sitcom_nemesis@tech.lgbt]

@swannodette I wouldn't be surprised about this correlation, I believe the appeal of permissive licenses is that they are corporate friendly and LLMs are certainly corporate friendly. Similarly, GPL licenses are corporate-unfriendly and more community-based and I think community-based projects tend to be more hostile to LLMs.

But I think this is all correlation, not necessarily causation