Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky.

I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
342 Posts 109 Posters 884 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT thisismissem@hachyderm.io

    @mat @mcc @eniko I think you'd be hard pressed to implement AT Proto in PHP tbh..

    Edit, to expand on that: AT Proto requires a bunch of cryptography (for keys and dpop and such), and websockets for the sync part of the protocol (which is how relay's typically hear about your posts)

    thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
    thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
    thisismissem@hachyderm.io
    wrote on last edited by
    #181

    @mat @mcc @eniko you could probably take the bluesky-social/pds repo, and add in endpoints that a wordpress plugin would call to automatically create records in it for social posts, if you just wanna distribute out a app.bsky.feed.post for each wordpress post.

    That'd be pretty easy to do.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

      @mat @eniko Now, that last thing is possible, and even easy. But at that point it's really, super unclear *why* you would architect your Wordpress server to *be* a PDS, rather than running the regular PDS software on the same box, and having the Wordpress server post to it from time to time using the external API. It's extra work, but there's no obvious advantage and there's barely even a difference.

      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mcc@mastodon.social
      wrote on last edited by
      #182

      @mat @eniko Isn't it convenient that Bluesky has architected an "open" system where the solution to every problem turns out to be "use Bluesky", and any other solution requires fighting incredible gravity?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
        thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
        thisismissem@hachyderm.io
        wrote on last edited by
        #183

        @mat @mcc @eniko yeah, because you need sync, afaik. https://atproto.com/specs/sync

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mcc@mastodon.social
          wrote on last edited by
          #184

          @mat @thisismissem @eniko The continuous event streams are HTTP. Mine are being proxied through Apache

          thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

            @mcc @erincandescent The concept is that you intentionally preclude the possibility of detecting "double-spend" so that the system can't be used for exchanging things of value. As a bonus, this also precludes selling identities. It's impossible to prove you're not keeping hidden an earlier-dated transfer to a different new owner when you offer to transfer an identity for money.

            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
            wrote on last edited by
            #185

            @dalias @mcc it sounds like in an attempt to prevent people using your system for money you’ve also made it useless for actually managing identities because it becomes impossible to definitively recover control of a compromised account or transfer an account to someone else safely.

            dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

              @mat @thisismissem @eniko The continuous event streams are HTTP. Mine are being proxied through Apache

              thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
              thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
              thisismissem@hachyderm.io
              wrote on last edited by
              #186

              @mcc @mat @eniko I mean, kinda correct in that WebSockets are tunneled over HTTP, but it's still the WebSocket Protocol that is being used..

              mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tylercook@mastodon.gamedev.placeT tylercook@mastodon.gamedev.place

                @mcc I do, yeah. So it's just one part of the stack. The complicated parts come later, eh?

                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mcc@mastodon.social
                wrote on last edited by
                #187

                @tylercook Yes, correct. If you already have a setup for hosting Docker containers standing up the PDS is *trivial*. Like, you could do it in under an hour. I don't pay per byte of bandwidth (VPS) but the load from running my PDS has been so low I don't notice it. And if it turns out to be a problem you can migrate out to another PDS.

                I'm going to DM you a link to a Discord I found helpful when debugging issues with my PDS.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT thisismissem@hachyderm.io

                  @mcc @mat @eniko I mean, kinda correct in that WebSockets are tunneled over HTTP, but it's still the WebSocket Protocol that is being used..

                  mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mcc@mastodon.social
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #188

                  @thisismissem @mat @eniko Okay, yes, that's more accurate.

                  thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                    @fleeky 1. Correct
                    2. I don't know

                    fleeky@prsm.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fleeky@prsm.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fleeky@prsm.space
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #189

                    @mcc am having a discussion of this on bsky that is helping to disambiguate :
                    https://bsky.app/profile/futur.blue/post/3lyuzwzb2k226
                    also https://github.com/zeppelin-social/bluesky-appview

                    mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                      @thisismissem @mat @eniko Okay, yes, that's more accurate.

                      thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thisismissem@hachyderm.io
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #190

                      @mcc @mat @eniko so yeah, I was more saying PHP and WebSockets isn't likely to be the most pleasant time for someone. (much like Ruby and WebSockets)

                      But yeah, if you're suggesting a sidecar PDS to a wordpress blog that just publishes bluesky posts with a link to the wordpress post, then that'd be relatively simple. It's once you want to go beyond that that things start getting hard.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net

                        @dalias @mcc it sounds like in an attempt to prevent people using your system for money you’ve also made it useless for actually managing identities because it becomes impossible to definitively recover control of a compromised account or transfer an account to someone else safely.

                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalias@hachyderm.io
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #191

                        @erincandescent @mcc Nope. Recovery is one of the primary considerations. Unless you intentionally want recovery to be impossible (some people may), you have a recovery policy notarized (can be published or kept unpublished in safe storage you control) prior to any use of the identity. Then proof of conditions satisfying the recovery policy preempt any transfer of control that took place later during a compromise.

                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                          @mcc @erincandescent The concept is that you intentionally preclude the possibility of detecting "double-spend" so that the system can't be used for exchanging things of value. As a bonus, this also precludes selling identities. It's impossible to prove you're not keeping hidden an earlier-dated transfer to a different new owner when you offer to transfer an identity for money.

                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mcc@mastodon.social
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #192

                          @dalias @erincandescent I understand how such a system would work but I would not use it for at least two reasons

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                            @erincandescent @mcc Nope. Recovery is one of the primary considerations. Unless you intentionally want recovery to be impossible (some people may), you have a recovery policy notarized (can be published or kept unpublished in safe storage you control) prior to any use of the identity. Then proof of conditions satisfying the recovery policy preempt any transfer of control that took place later during a compromise.

                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.io
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #193

                            @erincandescent @mcc And in my view, "not usable for money" is a prerequisite for "usable as identity". Related: the whole market for buying popular browser extensions to put malware in them.

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                              Why does the "relay" matter? Well, because although Bluesky's claim is that moderation is "composable" in their system— that you can choose which moderators to follow— moderation decisions made by Bluesky are hard binding on systems they control. Someone blocked by Bluesky is blocked from the Bluesky appview, their content will get removed from the Bluesky PDS if they were using that. The Bluesky relay censors content that violates the data "schema"; I suspect (?) it enforces moderation also.

                              res260@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                              res260@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                              res260@infosec.exchange
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #194

                              @mcc I don't think the last part is true. Their relay implementation is open source also. Trying to find more info about this

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mcc@mastodon.social
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #195

                                @mat @eniko Well, point of order. Do I want to work together? If so, why? I have no incentive or desire to badmouth Bluesky specifically, but also, do I have any incentive to grow their ecosystem or help their corporate project? All I want to do is talk to people. The only ATP dev I've done has been because it makes it easier for me to talk people.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                  And that's why I say, TLDR:

                                  - I am legitimately excited about the work being done by Blacksky Algorithms! I am using their frontend and happy with it.

                                  - Northsky is an interesting development to watch

                                  - If you're on a Bluesky PDS, I recommend migrating off with one of these tools https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ii5jchdzlmcojjw4dqczcgkh/post/3lyt6t6qfa22u

                                  - Everything Sucks. A LOT of things would have to change at a social level for *any* entity other than Bluesky to have power or independence in the ATP ecosystem. I still don't trust Bluesky.

                                  bustamarx@corteximplant.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bustamarx@corteximplant.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bustamarx@corteximplant.com
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #196

                                  @mcc This is great information, thank you for updating us. And thanks to @cwebber for boosting it into my feed. 👍

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                    Why does the "relay" matter? Well, because although Bluesky's claim is that moderation is "composable" in their system— that you can choose which moderators to follow— moderation decisions made by Bluesky are hard binding on systems they control. Someone blocked by Bluesky is blocked from the Bluesky appview, their content will get removed from the Bluesky PDS if they were using that. The Bluesky relay censors content that violates the data "schema"; I suspect (?) it enforces moderation also.

                                    boris@cosocial.caB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    boris@cosocial.caB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    boris@cosocial.ca
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #197

                                    @mcc Content doesn’t get removed from the PDS it would be hidden by labels - accounts do have takedown labels applied.

                                    Bluesky operated relay doesn’t censor Lexicons that don’t validate and it doesn’t enforce moderation.

                                    For those following along at home the relay costs about $30/month to run for all ~38M accounts worth of content.

                                    mcc@mastodon.socialM makeworld@merveilles.townM 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • boris@cosocial.caB boris@cosocial.ca

                                      @mcc Content doesn’t get removed from the PDS it would be hidden by labels - accounts do have takedown labels applied.

                                      Bluesky operated relay doesn’t censor Lexicons that don’t validate and it doesn’t enforce moderation.

                                      For those following along at home the relay costs about $30/month to run for all ~38M accounts worth of content.

                                      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mcc@mastodon.social
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #198

                                      @boris "Content doesn’t get removed from the PDS it would be hidden by labels - accounts do have takedown labels applied." I could be wrong but this seems to be contradicted by actual events over the last two weeks.

                                      "Bluesky operated relay doesn’t censor Lexicons that don’t validate" Contradicted by my own testing. Either the relay censors them or the appview does and it comes to the same thing, because when I make 301-character posts even third party tools can't see them.

                                      boris@cosocial.caB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • fleeky@prsm.spaceF fleeky@prsm.space

                                        @mcc am having a discussion of this on bsky that is helping to disambiguate :
                                        https://bsky.app/profile/futur.blue/post/3lyuzwzb2k226
                                        also https://github.com/zeppelin-social/bluesky-appview

                                        mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mcc@mastodon.social
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #199

                                        @fleeky As an update, I searched on blacksky.community for "from:me blackbird" and found a post from 2024. So they have some source of older posts.

                                        fleeky@prsm.spaceF 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                          @boris "Content doesn’t get removed from the PDS it would be hidden by labels - accounts do have takedown labels applied." I could be wrong but this seems to be contradicted by actual events over the last two weeks.

                                          "Bluesky operated relay doesn’t censor Lexicons that don’t validate" Contradicted by my own testing. Either the relay censors them or the appview does and it comes to the same thing, because when I make 301-character posts even third party tools can't see them.

                                          boris@cosocial.caB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          boris@cosocial.caB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          boris@cosocial.ca
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #200

                                          @mcc accounts get taken down! Posts do not / individual posts doesn’t get removed out of the repo (would also break verification of a repo and is detectable)

                                          yes apps all choose their validation (and for that matter strong types). Regardless it’s not the relay that’s doing it if you’d like to be correct about where locus of control is.

                                          mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups