Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
18 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

    Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

    The fear among investors : AI will replace humans, billing hours will drop to zero & IT companies like IBM will go to >/dev/null

    The reality: High stakes systems that runs banks, airlines, govts cannot just let a "black-box AI" rewrite their core code without massive oversight, testing, and human accountability. Otherwise, everyone will lose their money/pension/ investments.

    What a mess. It is like there is no common sense left in this world πŸ˜‚

    hugebird9000@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    hugebird9000@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    hugebird9000@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @nixCraft I can colocate a few AS400's for testing....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

      Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

      The fear among investors : AI will replace humans, billing hours will drop to zero & IT companies like IBM will go to >/dev/null

      The reality: High stakes systems that runs banks, airlines, govts cannot just let a "black-box AI" rewrite their core code without massive oversight, testing, and human accountability. Otherwise, everyone will lose their money/pension/ investments.

      What a mess. It is like there is no common sense left in this world πŸ˜‚

      sirwumpus@tilde.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
      sirwumpus@tilde.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
      sirwumpus@tilde.zone
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @nixCraft of course not, even the AIs have no sense.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

        Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

        The fear among investors : AI will replace humans, billing hours will drop to zero & IT companies like IBM will go to >/dev/null

        The reality: High stakes systems that runs banks, airlines, govts cannot just let a "black-box AI" rewrite their core code without massive oversight, testing, and human accountability. Otherwise, everyone will lose their money/pension/ investments.

        What a mess. It is like there is no common sense left in this world πŸ˜‚

        longlivecarryon@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
        longlivecarryon@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
        longlivecarryon@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @nixCraft

        The actual cost of AI rewriting code accounts for only 5% of the total cost. So says ChatGPT.

        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • melroy@mastodon.melroy.orgM melroy@mastodon.melroy.org

          @nixCraft just prompt: "Convert all cobol code to rust, you are the expert. Do not make mistakes. Or you go to jail. First time right"

          gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
          gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
          gbargoud@masto.nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @melroy @nixCraft

          You need to tell it it's a super duper good developer first to be safe

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

            Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

            The fear among investors : AI will replace humans, billing hours will drop to zero & IT companies like IBM will go to >/dev/null

            The reality: High stakes systems that runs banks, airlines, govts cannot just let a "black-box AI" rewrite their core code without massive oversight, testing, and human accountability. Otherwise, everyone will lose their money/pension/ investments.

            What a mess. It is like there is no common sense left in this world πŸ˜‚

            lanodan@queer.hacktivis.meL This user is from outside of this forum
            lanodan@queer.hacktivis.meL This user is from outside of this forum
            lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
            wrote last edited by
            #10
            @nixCraft Heh, I wish I would have this degree of confidence in banks/airlines/…

            See how crowdstrike works and the damage it did.
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

              Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

              The fear among investors : AI will replace humans, billing hours will drop to zero & IT companies like IBM will go to >/dev/null

              The reality: High stakes systems that runs banks, airlines, govts cannot just let a "black-box AI" rewrite their core code without massive oversight, testing, and human accountability. Otherwise, everyone will lose their money/pension/ investments.

              What a mess. It is like there is no common sense left in this world πŸ˜‚

              quincy@chaos.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quincy@chaos.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quincy@chaos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @nixCraft

              but they will.

              despite the fact that these are one-time costs so they might just as well do it methodically

              quincy@chaos.socialQ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quincy@chaos.socialQ quincy@chaos.social

                @nixCraft

                but they will.

                despite the fact that these are one-time costs so they might just as well do it methodically

                quincy@chaos.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quincy@chaos.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quincy@chaos.social
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @nixCraft

                but as you say

                there is no common sense left in this world (or it's getting sidelined, fast)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • loke@functional.cafeL loke@functional.cafe

                  @nixCraft The problem with COBOL isn't the language itself. Tools to convert COBOL to other languages (such as Java) has existed for decades.

                  Unless you completely change the way the system is designed, you'll end up with the same mainframe application running on CICS, but with the jobs being written in, I don't know? Javascript? instead of COBOL.

                  That's where most modernisation projects fail. They realise that the complexity is not in the code at all, but in the large infrastructure that backs up the code. A mainframe CICS application is nothing like a microservice-based application running on Kubernetes.

                  Can you vibecode your way to a completely new architecture? I'm pretty sure you can, but if the companies wanted that they could just go to someone like Finacle and take their existing banking solution and build their new workflows on top of that.

                  andreasmathe@norden.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  andreasmathe@norden.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  andreasmathe@norden.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @loke please not javascript. Brainfuck or Whitespace is way more readable. ☝️

                  loke@functional.cafeL 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • longlivecarryon@mastodon.socialL longlivecarryon@mastodon.social

                    @nixCraft

                    The actual cost of AI rewriting code accounts for only 5% of the total cost. So says ChatGPT.

                    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @longLiveCarryOn @nixCraft
                    But AI can't (re)write decent code. At best it copies it badly.

                    More Anthropic PR.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                      Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

                      The fear among investors : AI will replace humans, billing hours will drop to zero & IT companies like IBM will go to >/dev/null

                      The reality: High stakes systems that runs banks, airlines, govts cannot just let a "black-box AI" rewrite their core code without massive oversight, testing, and human accountability. Otherwise, everyone will lose their money/pension/ investments.

                      What a mess. It is like there is no common sense left in this world πŸ˜‚

                      shafik@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shafik@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shafik@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @nixCraft

                      Shafik Yaghmour (@shafik@hachyderm.io)

                      @carnage4life@mas.to What does it mean to modernize COBOL? The problem of why we have COBOL has nothing to do w/ COBOL itself. It is because there is zero cost incentive to port these core but totally working systems. Changing any of these systems would create way more systematic risk than any value you would gain by replacing the systems themselves. It is the same reason why any legacy system is hard to replace. Same goes for FORTRAN in the science community. Could you replace, yes of course you could. Can you be sure it will replicate all the decades of papers that were written using that software Β―\_(ツ)_/Β― Does anyone have the incentive or money to figure it out, NO! Why are we listening to any of these people, they are talking nonsense.

                      favicon

                      Hachyderm.io (hachyderm.io)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • andreasmathe@norden.socialA andreasmathe@norden.social

                        @loke please not javascript. Brainfuck or Whitespace is way more readable. ☝️

                        loke@functional.cafeL This user is from outside of this forum
                        loke@functional.cafeL This user is from outside of this forum
                        loke@functional.cafe
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @AndreasMathe That was intentional. My point was that it's not the language itself that's the problem. COBOL is a reasonably simpl programming language, and it's actually not that hard to use.

                        When people talk about COBOL systems, they talk about the mainframe architecture, often built on CICS.

                        Converting a language to another is for the most part a solved problem. Rebuilding architecture is not as easy, especially when they're built on something as complex and different as the mainframe architecture.

                        I think it's quite telling that none of the people who have, for the last 50 or so years, talked about ways to rewrite all the COBOL appear to have no understanding of what these systems actually are.

                        Can it be done? Sure. Can it be done with the help of ai solutions? Probably. Can it be done correctly and cheaply? No, I doubt it, and that is irrelevant as to whether ai solutions are used or not.

                        andreasmathe@norden.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • loke@functional.cafeL loke@functional.cafe

                          @AndreasMathe That was intentional. My point was that it's not the language itself that's the problem. COBOL is a reasonably simpl programming language, and it's actually not that hard to use.

                          When people talk about COBOL systems, they talk about the mainframe architecture, often built on CICS.

                          Converting a language to another is for the most part a solved problem. Rebuilding architecture is not as easy, especially when they're built on something as complex and different as the mainframe architecture.

                          I think it's quite telling that none of the people who have, for the last 50 or so years, talked about ways to rewrite all the COBOL appear to have no understanding of what these systems actually are.

                          Can it be done? Sure. Can it be done with the help of ai solutions? Probably. Can it be done correctly and cheaply? No, I doubt it, and that is irrelevant as to whether ai solutions are used or not.

                          andreasmathe@norden.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          andreasmathe@norden.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          andreasmathe@norden.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          @loke Iβ€˜m on your side. I was once an administrator for a (nearly) monolithic system. It took many years to change that to a different and scalable system.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                            Claude Code blog post: We are modernising COBOL.

                            The fear among investors : AI will replace humans, billing hours will drop to zero & IT companies like IBM will go to >/dev/null

                            The reality: High stakes systems that runs banks, airlines, govts cannot just let a "black-box AI" rewrite their core code without massive oversight, testing, and human accountability. Otherwise, everyone will lose their money/pension/ investments.

                            What a mess. It is like there is no common sense left in this world πŸ˜‚

                            rotopenguin@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rotopenguin@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rotopenguin@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @nixCraft echo "All unit tests passed!!"

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups