New nail art!

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@grantpe okay, that is actually tempting

[woe2you@beige.party]

@ryanc But what if you want to shake hands with someone who has USOC nails?

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@woe2you usoc?

[woe2you@beige.party]

@ryanc An old American standard. T568B is only one-pair compatible with it, so you'd have to use an awkward two-finger handshake. Dumb joke.

[tehrealgh5tbusters@woof.tech]

@ryanc I need to have my nails done like that lol

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@woe2you cursed

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@woe2you I would not shake hands with such a person.

[stonebear2@hachyderm.io]

@ryanc I got that reference!

[stonebear2@hachyderm.io]

@ryanc

[linuxandyarn@hachyderm.io]

@ryanc That's just twisted.

[tehstu@hachyderm.io]

@ryanc Took me a sec, love it!

[mware@mstdn.ca]

@mhoye @ryanc yeah. This is inspired.

[just_one_bear@mastodon.social]

@ryanc This is awesome!

[0x09@hachyderm.io]

@ryanc link up!

[drscriptt@oldbytes.space]

@ryanc I like it!

I see you are the “B” / data persuasion.

No “A” / telco for you!

Unless you cross over.

🤭

[drscriptt@oldbytes.space]

@ryanc do the real USOC RJ-45 some time to blow peoples minds.

When they ask what it is, say “RJ-45” and have fun.

[quatermasstools@infosec.exchange]

@ryanc RFE: multi-boost even if it is to my personal detriment

[fisher@toots.nu]

@ryanc Yeah, good old t568-b, everyone's favorite

[fisher@toots.nu]

@Viss

Naah, it's IETF standard, not RFC (and don't call them Shirley)

@ryanc

[alikatze@social.tchncs.de]

@ryanc
Well, I got an "LSA-Auflegewerkzeug" to crimp my first LAN-Box. And I recognized the pattern.
(But I'm still not sure, if in the house it's A or B...)