Why is it every article about LLMs includes ‘LLMs do have legitimate use cases, for example [list of use cases for which LLMs are actively dangerous]’.
-
Why is it every article about LLMs includes ‘LLMs do have legitimate use cases, for example [list of use cases for which LLMs are actively dangerous]’.
-
Why is it every article about LLMs includes ‘LLMs do have legitimate use cases, for example [list of use cases for which LLMs are actively dangerous]’.
@david_chisnall Unironically, I prefer that over what I subjectively tend to see, which is (lightly paraphrased) "LLMs do have legitimate use cases, trust me bro".
-
Why is it every article about LLMs includes ‘LLMs do have legitimate use cases, for example [list of use cases for which LLMs are actively dangerous]’.
@david_chisnall “LLMs also show promise in high-pressure professional environments. For example, a surgeon in a rural hospital could use a hands-free voice interface powered by an LLM to receive real-time procedural guidance during a complex operation, helping ensure best-practice techniques are followed even when a specialist is not on site.”
-
Why is it every article about LLMs includes ‘LLMs do have legitimate use cases, for example [list of use cases for which LLMs are actively dangerous]’.
@david_chisnall Because thinkpiecing in ways that are superficially critical of slop engines but acknowledging "legitimate uses" is just centrist propaganda, and centrists are always just cowards aligned with the bad side.
-
Why is it every article about LLMs includes ‘LLMs do have legitimate use cases, for example [list of use cases for which LLMs are actively dangerous]’.
@david_chisnall @aburka "balance"
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topicR relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
