Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "Why can't Trump get his story straight about the nukes?"

"Why can't Trump get his story straight about the nukes?"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
49 Posts 23 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    And how do you unpack that? How do you deprogram someone from a place where learning things, and realizing how little they know is so horrible?

    It's impossible to learn if you cannot admit that you do not already know everything you need to know about the world.

    I think people *do* feel bad about what they don't know. Like not being able to find Iran on a map. That can feel embarrassing. But we can look at the maps. Read the history.

    serenus@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
    serenus@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
    serenus@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #39

    @futurebird This is something I don’t think I’ll ever really understand. I’m happy that I don’t know everything, won’t and can’t ever know everything, because it means there’ll always be something new out there for me. A world where I knew everything already would be a very boring one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jmax@mastodon.socialJ jmax@mastodon.social

      @futurebird I don't know. I think one of the fundamental choices people make while growing up is how to react to discovering you didn't know something, or were wrong.
      You either accept it without taking it as a personal affront, or you take it as a personal attack.
      I don't know how we determine our choice; mine certainly wasn't conscious. But as far as I can tell, my entire peer group had chosen by the end of high school.

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      phosphenes@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #40

      @jmax @futurebird

      Part of the problem is a culture of people who know things and use their greater knowledge to humiliate those who know less. I encounter this in job interviews all the time.

      I *never* do this to other people, it's evil. But when you are being attacked, the instinct is to hate the people who know more.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ariaflame@masto.aiA ariaflame@masto.ai

        @futurebird @InkySchwartz @hazelnot Though to be fair the USA sees *every* other nation as a lesser nation.

        inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        inkyschwartz@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #41

        @ariaflame @futurebird @hazelnot Currently yes. At other times? Your milage may vary depending on which other countries.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • celesteh@hachyderm.ioC celesteh@hachyderm.io

          @InkySchwartz @futurebird @hazelnot

          In January 2001, Bush had not won the election, and was unpopular and rightly viewed as illegitimate.

          He was determined to lower taxes and cut spending, so he eliminated many of the wasteful antiterrorism programmes started by Clinton.

          On September 10th, he was not liked, was having trouble passing laws and was seen as not competent to hold his role.

          A few weeks later, he was enormously powerful and able to pass legislation that had been previously unthinkably fascist.

          So, like, why would Trump's handlers be _against_ a retaliatory strike? If he gets blamed, it will be forgotten amidst all the other chaos. And if he isn't blamed, they can rush to fill in all the blanks in their existing policy.

          hazelnot@sunbeam.cityH This user is from outside of this forum
          hazelnot@sunbeam.cityH This user is from outside of this forum
          hazelnot@sunbeam.city
          wrote last edited by
          #42

          @celesteh @InkySchwartz @futurebird wait, I thought Bush did win the election but by a very small margin?

          celesteh@hachyderm.ioC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

            I think the shame and that can be induced by learning new things is tied to an essentialist and immutable view of what it means to be intelligent and wise.

            For them "Intelligence" isn't something that you do, for these people it's something that you *are*

            But this is false. To be intelligent you simply need to be open to learning new things every day. Willing to grow. That's it.

            bagofnails@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            bagofnails@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            bagofnails@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #43

            @futurebird

            Because he is a crook!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hazelnot@sunbeam.cityH hazelnot@sunbeam.city

              @celesteh @InkySchwartz @futurebird wait, I thought Bush did win the election but by a very small margin?

              celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
              celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
              celesteh@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #44

              @hazelnot @InkySchwartz @futurebird

              A bunch of wealthy Republicans disrupted the recount and the Supreme Court declared Bush president (by stopping all unfinished recounts).

              Several months later an audit showed that he lost.

              inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                I think the shame and that can be induced by learning new things is tied to an essentialist and immutable view of what it means to be intelligent and wise.

                For them "Intelligence" isn't something that you do, for these people it's something that you *are*

                But this is false. To be intelligent you simply need to be open to learning new things every day. Willing to grow. That's it.

                scottmiller42@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                scottmiller42@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                scottmiller42@mstdn.social
                wrote last edited by
                #45

                @futurebird Great points, well timed. I literally just a few minutes ago had conversation where I said “I have to admit that 3 weeks ago, I wasn’t really familiar with geography of Strait of Hormuz & Persian Gulf, & had to look them up on a map.”

                On some level, you can’t learn anything if you aren’t readily willing to admit ignorance. To the extent that narcissism prevents a person from admitting that…

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • celesteh@hachyderm.ioC celesteh@hachyderm.io

                  @hazelnot @InkySchwartz @futurebird

                  A bunch of wealthy Republicans disrupted the recount and the Supreme Court declared Bush president (by stopping all unfinished recounts).

                  Several months later an audit showed that he lost.

                  inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  inkyschwartz@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #46

                  @celesteh @hazelnot @futurebird Which audit? Because I found 3 major ones and all showed various outcomes depending on the standard.

                  https://www.cnn.com/2015/10/31/politics/bush-gore-2000-election-results-studies/

                  celesteh@hachyderm.ioC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI inkyschwartz@mastodon.social

                    @celesteh @hazelnot @futurebird Which audit? Because I found 3 major ones and all showed various outcomes depending on the standard.

                    https://www.cnn.com/2015/10/31/politics/bush-gore-2000-election-results-studies/

                    celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                    celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                    celesteh@hachyderm.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #47

                    @InkySchwartz @hazelnot @futurebird

                    The media reporting on this was carefully vague, but all full recount of all Florida votes would be a narrow victory for Gore.

                    Gore didn't sue for a full recount, so his legal strategy was not a winning one, so most reporting focussed on Gore strategy and not on the end vote tally.

                    celesteh@hachyderm.ioC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • celesteh@hachyderm.ioC celesteh@hachyderm.io

                      @InkySchwartz @hazelnot @futurebird

                      The media reporting on this was carefully vague, but all full recount of all Florida votes would be a narrow victory for Gore.

                      Gore didn't sue for a full recount, so his legal strategy was not a winning one, so most reporting focussed on Gore strategy and not on the end vote tally.

                      celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                      celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                      celesteh@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #48

                      @InkySchwartz @hazelnot @futurebird

                      The Supreme Court did specifically decode the election instead of a recount, so this did call Bush's legitimacy into serious question at the time.

                      Source: am old

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • austin_dern@blimps.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
                        austin_dern@blimps.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
                        austin_dern@blimps.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #49

                        @AdrianRiskin @futurebird @GoblinQuester In the 1950s the journalist Edward R Murrow took his documentary _See It Now_ to Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study, to explain what it did and how it worked that to the public. He observed of the experience being around this most-famous-bunch-of-thinkers that he never heard the phrase "I don't know" so often in his life.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups