Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Last year, someone (specifically, OUP) asked me to write an encyclopedia entry for "AI".

Last year, someone (specifically, OUP) asked me to write an encyclopedia entry for "AI".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
27 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

    1. AI Is a Research Field
    2. AI Is an Approach to Cognitive Science
    3. AI Is a Parlor Trick
    4. AI Is an Ideology
    5. AI Is a Way to Hide and Devalue Human Labor
    6. AI Is a Way to Shift Accountability
    7. AI Is a Way to Centralize Power

    >>

    djl@mastodon.mit.eduD This user is from outside of this forum
    djl@mastodon.mit.eduD This user is from outside of this forum
    djl@mastodon.mit.edu
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @emilymbender

    AI _SHOULD_ be an approach to Cognitive Science. The parts af AI that aren't have nothing to do with intelligence.

    But, careful there. The folks doing domain modelling (Go, chess, protein folding, gradient decent) are reasonable comp. sci. stuff. (Although calling that stuff "AI" is completely ridiculous.)

    It's LLMs that are exactly and only parlor tricks.

    But the incredibly-stupidity-dense clusterfrack that AI has become is embarassing.

    lina@neuromatch.socialL androcat@toot.catA claudius@darmstadt.socialC 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • djl@mastodon.mit.eduD djl@mastodon.mit.edu

      @emilymbender

      AI _SHOULD_ be an approach to Cognitive Science. The parts af AI that aren't have nothing to do with intelligence.

      But, careful there. The folks doing domain modelling (Go, chess, protein folding, gradient decent) are reasonable comp. sci. stuff. (Although calling that stuff "AI" is completely ridiculous.)

      It's LLMs that are exactly and only parlor tricks.

      But the incredibly-stupidity-dense clusterfrack that AI has become is embarassing.

      lina@neuromatch.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      lina@neuromatch.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      lina@neuromatch.social
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @djl
      @emilymbender

      intelligence has nothing to do with intelligence

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
      • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

        "The term “AI” resists definition because it is continually reappropriated by people to mean different things. This, in turn, means that discussions of AI that do not provide working definitions for the purposes at hand risk incoherence. [...]

        Accordingly, this article does not provide a definition of the term “AI” but rather explores various ways in which the idea of AI has been used to organize how people understand our world, allocate resources, and relate to each other."

        >>

        hypostase@bsd.networkH This user is from outside of this forum
        hypostase@bsd.networkH This user is from outside of this forum
        hypostase@bsd.network
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @emilymbender
        So much this. Thank you.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

          Last year, someone (specifically, OUP) asked me to write an encyclopedia entry for "AI". I've just finished reviewing the copy edits, so hopefully it will be in the world soon. Meanwhile, a teaser:

          >>

          gabriel@col.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gabriel@col.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gabriel@col.social
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @emilymbender

          What is OUP? I'm not familiar with the acronym.

          I can't wait to read the entry 😁

          jochenlingelba1@h-net.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • roytoo@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            roytoo@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            roytoo@mstdn.social
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @gabriel
            Thanks for asking, I was wondering the same thing.
            @bodhipaksa
            Thanks for answering!
            @emilymbender

            npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

              1. AI Is a Research Field
              2. AI Is an Approach to Cognitive Science
              3. AI Is a Parlor Trick
              4. AI Is an Ideology
              5. AI Is a Way to Hide and Devalue Human Labor
              6. AI Is a Way to Shift Accountability
              7. AI Is a Way to Centralize Power

              >>

              65dbnoise@mastodon.social6 This user is from outside of this forum
              65dbnoise@mastodon.social6 This user is from outside of this forum
              65dbnoise@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @emilymbender
              8. AI is #technofascism

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                1. AI Is a Research Field
                2. AI Is an Approach to Cognitive Science
                3. AI Is a Parlor Trick
                4. AI Is an Ideology
                5. AI Is a Way to Hide and Devalue Human Labor
                6. AI Is a Way to Shift Accountability
                7. AI Is a Way to Centralize Power

                >>

                unfmeghan@dmv.communityU This user is from outside of this forum
                unfmeghan@dmv.communityU This user is from outside of this forum
                unfmeghan@dmv.community
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @emilymbender what happened to AI is a marketing term not a technology

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                  1. AI Is a Research Field
                  2. AI Is an Approach to Cognitive Science
                  3. AI Is a Parlor Trick
                  4. AI Is an Ideology
                  5. AI Is a Way to Hide and Devalue Human Labor
                  6. AI Is a Way to Shift Accountability
                  7. AI Is a Way to Centralize Power

                  >>

                  davide_sandini@mastodon.unoD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davide_sandini@mastodon.unoD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davide_sandini@mastodon.uno
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @emilymbender
                  Illuminating...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • roytoo@mstdn.socialR roytoo@mstdn.social

                    @gabriel
                    Thanks for asking, I was wondering the same thing.
                    @bodhipaksa
                    Thanks for answering!
                    @emilymbender

                    npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    npars01@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @roytoo @gabriel @bodhipaksa @emilymbender

                    OUP publishes some superb books.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gabriel@col.socialG gabriel@col.social

                      @emilymbender

                      What is OUP? I'm not familiar with the acronym.

                      I can't wait to read the entry 😁

                      jochenlingelba1@h-net.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jochenlingelba1@h-net.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jochenlingelba1@h-net.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @gabriel @emilymbender OUP is Oxford University Press

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                        "The term “AI” resists definition because it is continually reappropriated by people to mean different things. This, in turn, means that discussions of AI that do not provide working definitions for the purposes at hand risk incoherence. [...]

                        Accordingly, this article does not provide a definition of the term “AI” but rather explores various ways in which the idea of AI has been used to organize how people understand our world, allocate resources, and relate to each other."

                        >>

                        Q This user is from outside of this forum
                        Q This user is from outside of this forum
                        qybat@batchats.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @emilymbender If you understand your regression analysis, then it is basic statistics.

                        If you used some brute force and somewhat understand your regression analysis, then it is machine learning.

                        And if you have no idea how the mathematical abomination you just created works, and can only take on faith that it produces appropriate results most of the time, then it is AI.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                          In the end, this was a fun project to work on, especially through the readings I got to revisit (and sometimes read for the first time) in the process.

                          penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                          penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                          penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          @emilymbender

                          Where & when will it be published?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                            "The term “AI” resists definition because it is continually reappropriated by people to mean different things. This, in turn, means that discussions of AI that do not provide working definitions for the purposes at hand risk incoherence. [...]

                            Accordingly, this article does not provide a definition of the term “AI” but rather explores various ways in which the idea of AI has been used to organize how people understand our world, allocate resources, and relate to each other."

                            >>

                            sevoris@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sevoris@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sevoris@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            @emilymbender I really love the framing around "understand our world, allocate resources and relate to each other". It‘s short and yet it really teases at the social values of technology and also just the social power of the meanings of language (which I‘ve recently been learning a lot about for discourse analysis)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                              "The term “AI” resists definition because it is continually reappropriated by people to mean different things. This, in turn, means that discussions of AI that do not provide working definitions for the purposes at hand risk incoherence. [...]

                              Accordingly, this article does not provide a definition of the term “AI” but rather explores various ways in which the idea of AI has been used to organize how people understand our world, allocate resources, and relate to each other."

                              >>

                              rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18

                              @emilymbender back in the late 80s I recall much discussion about there being 7 problems that AI in some form would address. One, oddly, was speech synthesis. Another, more reasonably, was speech recognition (note: not understanding, more like transcribing). Image recognition was in there and I forget the others. I think your approach is more useful.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                1. AI Is a Research Field
                                2. AI Is an Approach to Cognitive Science
                                3. AI Is a Parlor Trick
                                4. AI Is an Ideology
                                5. AI Is a Way to Hide and Devalue Human Labor
                                6. AI Is a Way to Shift Accountability
                                7. AI Is a Way to Centralize Power

                                >>

                                collective_truth@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                collective_truth@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                collective_truth@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19

                                @emilymbender And remember:

                                Everything is a way to:

                                - Shift Accountability
                                - Centralize Power
                                - etc

                                IF THERE IS FREE LUNCH, YOU ARE THE DINNER! 🍴 👤 🏦 💵

                                (nothing commercially given for free & all is manipulation without good sense)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                  Last year, someone (specifically, OUP) asked me to write an encyclopedia entry for "AI". I've just finished reviewing the copy edits, so hopefully it will be in the world soon. Meanwhile, a teaser:

                                  >>

                                  botally54@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  botally54@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  botally54@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @emilymbender AI is our last warning.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • djl@mastodon.mit.eduD djl@mastodon.mit.edu

                                    @emilymbender

                                    AI _SHOULD_ be an approach to Cognitive Science. The parts af AI that aren't have nothing to do with intelligence.

                                    But, careful there. The folks doing domain modelling (Go, chess, protein folding, gradient decent) are reasonable comp. sci. stuff. (Although calling that stuff "AI" is completely ridiculous.)

                                    It's LLMs that are exactly and only parlor tricks.

                                    But the incredibly-stupidity-dense clusterfrack that AI has become is embarassing.

                                    androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    androcat@toot.cat
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @djl

                                    Well, the original intent of the term was extremely dishonest, so I would argue that the modern appropriations of the term for dishonest ends are actually failry genuine, and it was the poor sods using it for genuine approaches who got fooled and used to provide the term with legitimacy.

                                    @emilymbender

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • djl@mastodon.mit.eduD djl@mastodon.mit.edu

                                      @emilymbender

                                      AI _SHOULD_ be an approach to Cognitive Science. The parts af AI that aren't have nothing to do with intelligence.

                                      But, careful there. The folks doing domain modelling (Go, chess, protein folding, gradient decent) are reasonable comp. sci. stuff. (Although calling that stuff "AI" is completely ridiculous.)

                                      It's LLMs that are exactly and only parlor tricks.

                                      But the incredibly-stupidity-dense clusterfrack that AI has become is embarassing.

                                      claudius@darmstadt.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      claudius@darmstadt.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      claudius@darmstadt.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #22

                                      @djl @emilymbender that is not how words or definitions work.

                                      collective_truth@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • claudius@darmstadt.socialC claudius@darmstadt.social

                                        @djl @emilymbender that is not how words or definitions work.

                                        collective_truth@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        collective_truth@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        collective_truth@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @claudius Can you say more what you mean - I didn't understand what you mean / referring to.

                                        claudius@darmstadt.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • collective_truth@mastodon.socialC collective_truth@mastodon.social

                                          @claudius Can you say more what you mean - I didn't understand what you mean / referring to.

                                          claudius@darmstadt.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          claudius@darmstadt.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          claudius@darmstadt.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @collective_truth just because the stem word is "Intelligence" does not mean that everything combined with that word is exactly that. Or that one particular field of study should own it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups