Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Here's a post where the @vollaficationist clearly refers to themselves as being part of Volla and shares internal information which would only be known to someone working at Volla

Here's a post where the @vollaficationist clearly refers to themselves as being part of Volla and shares internal information which would only be known to someone working at Volla

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
32 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/116250746129876535

    Here's a post where the @vollaficationist clearly refers to themselves as being part of Volla and shares internal information which would only be known to someone working at Volla

    This account doesn't belong to someone who uses and supports Volla's products but rather belongs to someone working at the company. Take note of how they claim to respect GrapheneOS at the end of that post. It's an extreme contrast with many of the other posts they've made trying to undermine the GrapheneOS project.

    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    grapheneos@grapheneos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    We're opposing Volla's Unified Attestation API because it's fundamentally anti-competitive. They've failed to provide any justification for why there needs to be centralized verification through a new API built entirely on top of the Android hardware attestation API. Instead of engaging with our arguments against in good faith, they're repeatedly posting conspiracy theories about GrapheneOS claiming our project is a honey pot. Here's one of several examples.

    Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

    @guilg@piaille.fr @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social I suspect GOS is more, or different, from what they state they are. And from where do we always see v projection?

    favicon

    Mastodon (mastodon.social)

    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

      We're opposing Volla's Unified Attestation API because it's fundamentally anti-competitive. They've failed to provide any justification for why there needs to be centralized verification through a new API built entirely on top of the Android hardware attestation API. Instead of engaging with our arguments against in good faith, they're repeatedly posting conspiracy theories about GrapheneOS claiming our project is a honey pot. Here's one of several examples.

      Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

      @guilg@piaille.fr @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social I suspect GOS is more, or different, from what they state they are. And from where do we always see v projection?

      favicon

      Mastodon (mastodon.social)

      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      grapheneos@grapheneos.social
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      Here's another example visible right above that one in the same sub-thread:

      Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

      @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social Will you really? And you didn't Google? Now I'm actually really getting worried about the status of GOS. Well, I wish you the best.

      favicon

      Mastodon (mastodon.social)

      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

        Here's another example visible right above that one in the same sub-thread:

        Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

        @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social Will you really? And you didn't Google? Now I'm actually really getting worried about the status of GOS. Well, I wish you the best.

        favicon

        Mastodon (mastodon.social)

        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        grapheneos@grapheneos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        Here's Volla trying to push the idea that our opposition to Unified Attestation is being funded by shady forces tied to the US government or tech companies:

        Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

        @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @celeduc @guilg@piaille.fr @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu my dear friend, you did googlag-ware, and now Moto. It's quite amusing just how vigorously you defend American BigTech. Now disclose who is funding this social media frenzy.

        favicon

        Mastodon (mastodon.social)

        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

          Here's Volla trying to push the idea that our opposition to Unified Attestation is being funded by shady forces tied to the US government or tech companies:

          Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

          @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @celeduc @guilg@piaille.fr @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu my dear friend, you did googlag-ware, and now Moto. It's quite amusing just how vigorously you defend American BigTech. Now disclose who is funding this social media frenzy.

          favicon

          Mastodon (mastodon.social)

          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          grapheneos@grapheneos.social
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          Here they are doing the same thing while pushing the idea we aren't who we say we are and weren't actually founded by a Canadian in Canada in 2014:

          Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

          @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @celeduc @guilg@piaille.fr @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu I hoped you'd come to this. GOOGLAG is better, right?!? And iPhone... Well, I rest my case. Perhaps you are not who you claim to be? Sure, you're registered in Canada. Registered.

          favicon

          Mastodon (mastodon.social)

          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

            Here they are doing the same thing while pushing the idea we aren't who we say we are and weren't actually founded by a Canadian in Canada in 2014:

            Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

            @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @celeduc @guilg@piaille.fr @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu I hoped you'd come to this. GOOGLAG is better, right?!? And iPhone... Well, I rest my case. Perhaps you are not who you claim to be? Sure, you're registered in Canada. Registered.

            favicon

            Mastodon (mastodon.social)

            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            grapheneos@grapheneos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            Disingenuously misrepresenting our points about the anti-competitive nature of Unified Attestation while pushing their narrative that we're shady forces involved in US intelligence or something similar:

            Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

            @skywalker2k17@nerdculture.de @Phobos1641@mstdn.jp @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social but who is this dude, or many dudes, being kind of omnipresent (look it up) all over social media, 24/7¿ For me, today was my first day. A little shocked. Whatever, UA is open to anyone. And this fact is why the GOS dude is alleging, empty handed, that is illegal in Canada and EU. According to him/her it's probably globally illegal to contest googlag, right. You're welcome.

            favicon

            Mastodon (mastodon.social)

            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

              Disingenuously misrepresenting our points about the anti-competitive nature of Unified Attestation while pushing their narrative that we're shady forces involved in US intelligence or something similar:

              Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

              @skywalker2k17@nerdculture.de @Phobos1641@mstdn.jp @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social but who is this dude, or many dudes, being kind of omnipresent (look it up) all over social media, 24/7¿ For me, today was my first day. A little shocked. Whatever, UA is open to anyone. And this fact is why the GOS dude is alleging, empty handed, that is illegal in Canada and EU. According to him/her it's probably globally illegal to contest googlag, right. You're welcome.

              favicon

              Mastodon (mastodon.social)

              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              grapheneos@grapheneos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              Here they're attacking us for supporting secure devices and working with a major Android OEM towards a serious alternative to Pixels. Volla's devices aren't designed or made by them but rather made for them by an ODM. Their devices are bottom of the barrel MediaTek hardware with atrocious security. Those don't meet our standards. That's why we don't do it.

              Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

              @celeduc @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @guilg@piaille.fr @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu Volla develops not only devices or OS, or AI and more. It's also developing a new ecosystem as well as an infrastructure. Full decoupling. A fully, autonomous communications system. GOS is a hundred thousand miles from this, right. They do googlag-ware and now even Moto, lol.

              favicon

              Mastodon (mastodon.social)

              As an example of what they're doing, Volla is partnered with the hide.me VPN company and bundles their software.

              aissen@social.treehouse.systemsA grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                Here they're attacking us for supporting secure devices and working with a major Android OEM towards a serious alternative to Pixels. Volla's devices aren't designed or made by them but rather made for them by an ODM. Their devices are bottom of the barrel MediaTek hardware with atrocious security. Those don't meet our standards. That's why we don't do it.

                Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

                @celeduc @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @guilg@piaille.fr @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu Volla develops not only devices or OS, or AI and more. It's also developing a new ecosystem as well as an infrastructure. Full decoupling. A fully, autonomous communications system. GOS is a hundred thousand miles from this, right. They do googlag-ware and now even Moto, lol.

                favicon

                Mastodon (mastodon.social)

                As an example of what they're doing, Volla is partnered with the hide.me VPN company and bundles their software.

                aissen@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                aissen@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                aissen@social.treehouse.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @GrapheneOS you're answering to and giving visibility to a troll account. Honestly you're better off writing well reviewed blog posts instead of losing time on social media.

                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • aissen@social.treehouse.systemsA aissen@social.treehouse.systems

                  @GrapheneOS you're answering to and giving visibility to a troll account. Honestly you're better off writing well reviewed blog posts instead of losing time on social media.

                  grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @Aissen This account belongs to a Volla employee, not a troll. We know who owns the account.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                    Here they're attacking us for supporting secure devices and working with a major Android OEM towards a serious alternative to Pixels. Volla's devices aren't designed or made by them but rather made for them by an ODM. Their devices are bottom of the barrel MediaTek hardware with atrocious security. Those don't meet our standards. That's why we don't do it.

                    Vollaficationist (@vollaficationist@mastodon.social)

                    @celeduc @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @guilg@piaille.fr @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu Volla develops not only devices or OS, or AI and more. It's also developing a new ecosystem as well as an infrastructure. Full decoupling. A fully, autonomous communications system. GOS is a hundred thousand miles from this, right. They do googlag-ware and now even Moto, lol.

                    favicon

                    Mastodon (mastodon.social)

                    As an example of what they're doing, Volla is partnered with the hide.me VPN company and bundles their software.

                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    Here are a series of posts from the Volla employee running @vollaficationist where they misrepresent their hardware as open source, inaccurately claim it's the most private/secure option with no basis and misrepresent white labelled devices from an ODM as being something far more:

                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114828788734572857
                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114828811907163145
                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114829672784072518
                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114840452085799582
                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114845015249347866
                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114851316858791155
                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114851330429465362
                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114851686998902978
                    https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114851697197013603

                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                      Here are a series of posts from the Volla employee running @vollaficationist where they misrepresent their hardware as open source, inaccurately claim it's the most private/secure option with no basis and misrepresent white labelled devices from an ODM as being something far more:

                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114828788734572857
                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114828811907163145
                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114829672784072518
                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114840452085799582
                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114845015249347866
                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114851316858791155
                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114851330429465362
                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114851686998902978
                      https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/114851697197013603

                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      RE: https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/116250746129876535

                      In several of these threads, Volla is trying to mislead people about what they can obtain elsewhere including with GrapheneOS to promote their products. This account was originally pretending to be a Volla supporter but recently switched to speaking on behalf of Volla and posting information only known to Volla internally including https://grapheneos.social/@vollaficationist@mastodon.social/116250746180349726. It very clearly belongs to Volla and is an example of how we've seen them doing marketing across platforms including jabs at GrapheneOS.

                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG edcates@mastodon.socialE 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                        RE: https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/116250746129876535

                        In several of these threads, Volla is trying to mislead people about what they can obtain elsewhere including with GrapheneOS to promote their products. This account was originally pretending to be a Volla supporter but recently switched to speaking on behalf of Volla and posting information only known to Volla internally including https://grapheneos.social/@vollaficationist@mastodon.social/116250746180349726. It very clearly belongs to Volla and is an example of how we've seen them doing marketing across platforms including jabs at GrapheneOS.

                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        This is how these companies market their products. They mislead people into buying their products rather than using much more private and secure options.

                        iodé and Murena have been doing this on a much larger scale than Volla with much more underhanded tactics. They've heavily pushed the false narrative that GrapheneOS isn't usable by regular people, isn't compatible with enough apps and many other inaccurate claims. In reality, it has far broader app compatibility and is much more usable.

                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG raisondetredev@mastodon.deR 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                          RE: https://mastodon.social/@vollaficationist/116250746129876535

                          In several of these threads, Volla is trying to mislead people about what they can obtain elsewhere including with GrapheneOS to promote their products. This account was originally pretending to be a Volla supporter but recently switched to speaking on behalf of Volla and posting information only known to Volla internally including https://grapheneos.social/@vollaficationist@mastodon.social/116250746180349726. It very clearly belongs to Volla and is an example of how we've seen them doing marketing across platforms including jabs at GrapheneOS.

                          edcates@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                          edcates@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                          edcates@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @GrapheneOS But . . . but . . . they called it "googlag!"

                          GOOGLAG! Like, 83 times.

                          How is that not compelling rhetoric!? 🙄

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                            This is how these companies market their products. They mislead people into buying their products rather than using much more private and secure options.

                            iodé and Murena have been doing this on a much larger scale than Volla with much more underhanded tactics. They've heavily pushed the false narrative that GrapheneOS isn't usable by regular people, isn't compatible with enough apps and many other inaccurate claims. In reality, it has far broader app compatibility and is much more usable.

                            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            Volla, Murena and iodé have come together to form the Unified Attestation initiative which will permit using their products while disallowing using alternatives not participating in it. This is fundamentally an anti-competitive system. These companies are consistently not honest about what they provide with users and are playing the same game with Unified Attestation pretending that it's an open system bringing people freedom when in reality it's designed to crush competition and openness.

                            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                              Volla, Murena and iodé have come together to form the Unified Attestation initiative which will permit using their products while disallowing using alternatives not participating in it. This is fundamentally an anti-competitive system. These companies are consistently not honest about what they provide with users and are playing the same game with Unified Attestation pretending that it's an open system bringing people freedom when in reality it's designed to crush competition and openness.

                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              Unified Attestation will only permit using the devices and operating systems participating in it. If GrapheneOS participated in it and was initially permitted, we would always be under the threat of the companies involved disallowing it. These companies and their governments could use this to exert pressure on GrapheneOS to do what they want. They can come up with arbitrary requirements for what's needed to obtain and preserve certification including requirements incompatible with our approach.

                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                Unified Attestation will only permit using the devices and operating systems participating in it. If GrapheneOS participated in it and was initially permitted, we would always be under the threat of the companies involved disallowing it. These companies and their governments could use this to exert pressure on GrapheneOS to do what they want. They can come up with arbitrary requirements for what's needed to obtain and preserve certification including requirements incompatible with our approach.

                                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                For example, any system like this is likely to end up requiring approving each release before it would be compatible with apps checking for certified devices. This means releases would be arbitrarily delayed for certification prior to users being able to receive them without losing compatibility with any apps adopting it. The companies involved can put arbitrary requirements in place which are fine with them but not with us. Governments can also begin to exert control over this system.

                                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                  For example, any system like this is likely to end up requiring approving each release before it would be compatible with apps checking for certified devices. This means releases would be arbitrarily delayed for certification prior to users being able to receive them without losing compatibility with any apps adopting it. The companies involved can put arbitrary requirements in place which are fine with them but not with us. Governments can also begin to exert control over this system.

                                  grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  European governments would be able to block certifying GrapheneOS because we won't implement age verification, invasive client side AI scanning and other systems they're trying to impose on devices and operating systems. They can make it into a requirement to integrate these for certification. Volla, Murena and iodé are not privacy/security hardened operating systems. They do not try to protect users against authoritarian surveillance including via exploits. They do not share our goals/values.

                                  grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                    European governments would be able to block certifying GrapheneOS because we won't implement age verification, invasive client side AI scanning and other systems they're trying to impose on devices and operating systems. They can make it into a requirement to integrate these for certification. Volla, Murena and iodé are not privacy/security hardened operating systems. They do not try to protect users against authoritarian surveillance including via exploits. They do not share our goals/values.

                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    These companies MUST NOT be allowed to successfully seize control over the compatibility of European banking/government apps with mobile devices via Unified Attestation. These companies have a view of privacy based around protecting people from Google and the US government rather than privacy from corporations and governments as a whole. They even market themselves as providing so-called digital sovereignty by giving European governments access and control instead of the American government.

                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                      These companies MUST NOT be allowed to successfully seize control over the compatibility of European banking/government apps with mobile devices via Unified Attestation. These companies have a view of privacy based around protecting people from Google and the US government rather than privacy from corporations and governments as a whole. They even market themselves as providing so-called digital sovereignty by giving European governments access and control instead of the American government.

                                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      GrapheneOS is based in Canada but we don't promote it based around it being based in Canada. We're willing to move our non-profit and operations elsewhere in the future if Canada ever passes laws incompatible with our goals. It's based in Canada because it was practical rather than as a core value or approach of GrapheneOS. If Canada goes down the same path as the EU and starts passing laws we cannot accept, then we'll leave Canada rather than ruining GrapheneOS. They won't do that with the EU.

                                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG craftingdragon@social.gamepowerx.comC raisondetredev@mastodon.deR 3 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                        GrapheneOS is based in Canada but we don't promote it based around it being based in Canada. We're willing to move our non-profit and operations elsewhere in the future if Canada ever passes laws incompatible with our goals. It's based in Canada because it was practical rather than as a core value or approach of GrapheneOS. If Canada goes down the same path as the EU and starts passing laws we cannot accept, then we'll leave Canada rather than ruining GrapheneOS. They won't do that with the EU.

                                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        GrapheneOS exists for the purpose of creating highly private and secure devices which are highly usable and compatible with all of the apps people want to use. GrapheneOS doesn't exist to provide a Canadian smartphone OS and eventually hardware. It's based in Canada because it was a pragmatic decision and we believe it's currently a better location for privacy projects than the US or EU. If that significantly changes, we're open to creating a non-profit elsewhere and moving our operations there.

                                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        0
                                        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                          GrapheneOS exists for the purpose of creating highly private and secure devices which are highly usable and compatible with all of the apps people want to use. GrapheneOS doesn't exist to provide a Canadian smartphone OS and eventually hardware. It's based in Canada because it was a pragmatic decision and we believe it's currently a better location for privacy projects than the US or EU. If that significantly changes, we're open to creating a non-profit elsewhere and moving our operations there.

                                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          GrapheneOS will fight against attempts by the Canadian government to take control over what people are allowed to use on their devices rather than building a system to enable it. Volla is building a system governments will be able to use to control which hardware and software people are allowed to use. The only usage of attestation should be to protect users as our Auditor app does, not to control what they can use as a growing subset of banking and government apps are doing. That should stop.

                                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG john@vyrse.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups