Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Recently read a post (can’t remember from whom) about the ridiculous California age verified OS thing.

Recently read a post (can’t remember from whom) about the ridiculous California age verified OS thing.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
    ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
    ret@furry.engineer
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Recently read a post (can’t remember from whom) about the ridiculous California age verified OS thing. It totally let-off the lady responsible for the bill, essentially saying “oh she means well” and excusing her total ignorance. I’ve seen the same sort of thing about Ofcom vis the OSA here.

    I’m sorry, no. If you are working on something like that and you don’t understand it, it is your duty to first educate and inform yourself on it. If you think of an idea and you aren’t sure if it can be implemented, find some domain experts, maybe at your local university CS dept (Christ, this is California…) and ASK. To not do so is a failure of statecraft, which is precisely what the lady in question has committed. She does not deserve a pass. Her ignorance should be highlighted.

    Equally, if you are told to implement something that you know cannot work or cannot be effective, SAY SO. Refuse, if you must.

    ret@furry.engineerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ret@furry.engineerR ret@furry.engineer

      Recently read a post (can’t remember from whom) about the ridiculous California age verified OS thing. It totally let-off the lady responsible for the bill, essentially saying “oh she means well” and excusing her total ignorance. I’ve seen the same sort of thing about Ofcom vis the OSA here.

      I’m sorry, no. If you are working on something like that and you don’t understand it, it is your duty to first educate and inform yourself on it. If you think of an idea and you aren’t sure if it can be implemented, find some domain experts, maybe at your local university CS dept (Christ, this is California…) and ASK. To not do so is a failure of statecraft, which is precisely what the lady in question has committed. She does not deserve a pass. Her ignorance should be highlighted.

      Equally, if you are told to implement something that you know cannot work or cannot be effective, SAY SO. Refuse, if you must.

      ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
      ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
      ret@furry.engineer
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      I refuse to believe that she didn’t sit down for an hour with even least ONE “computer person” and say “is this sensible and workable?”. If she did, she didn’t listen and is clearly ignorant. And if she didn’t, she is ignorant too.

      wooshell@chaosfurs.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ret@furry.engineerR ret@furry.engineer

        I refuse to believe that she didn’t sit down for an hour with even least ONE “computer person” and say “is this sensible and workable?”. If she did, she didn’t listen and is clearly ignorant. And if she didn’t, she is ignorant too.

        wooshell@chaosfurs.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wooshell@chaosfurs.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wooshell@chaosfurs.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @ret This is all just performative politics theatre.. "look, I'm doing something to protect the children".
        They are *actively avoiding* talking to experts because that could ruin their lofty ideas.
        Politicians do not want technical reality to ruin their populistic dogmas.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups