I regularly read posts from people in tech who are burning out because they are tired of their coworkers who have outsourced all of their work including their thinking to AI.

[carnage4life@mas.to]

I regularly read posts from people in tech who are burning out because they are tired of their coworkers who have outsourced all of their work including their thinking to AI.

I generally have two simple rules of thumb for my team’s usage of AI

1. Your coworkers shouldn’t be the first humans to have read what you produce. Vetting the content is on you.

2. If you’re using AI, you have no excuse for the content being lengthy and verbose. Conciseness is a prompt away.

[dwhisper@friendsofdesoto.social]

@carnage4life we had to put down rules around d this at work just this week. We were getting a trend of “code reviews”that was just Claude copy pasta with a disclaimer “check if these are valid or not” to the person who put up the PR.

My running mantra, even though we all use it,is “I don’t care what Claude says, I’m telling you this”

[tsupasat@infosec.exchange]

@carnage4life I firmly believe that people will remember who does this and it will be held against them, and not in a vindictive way. If someone's work is just AI output without any human judgement, then why would I want to work with you in the future?