Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit?

Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
76 Posts 62 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
    saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
    saltywizard@beige.party
    wrote last edited by
    #65

    @otte_homan @akareilly @sundogplanets

    this is why i'm here

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hundhamm@muenchen.socialH hundhamm@muenchen.social

      @sundogplanets
      Already done:
      https://magazin.tu-braunschweig.de/en/m-post/burned-up-satellite-debris-could-deplete-ozone-layer/

      momo@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
      momo@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
      momo@social.linux.pizza
      wrote last edited by
      #66

      @hundhamm
      ...aaaand it died from traffic. 😅
      @sundogplanets

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

        Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

        SpaceX is truly awful.

        aimeemaroux@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        aimeemaroux@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        aimeemaroux@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #67

        @sundogplanets I'd do it in a heartbeat but I'm a freelance writer and would have to pitch it to newspapers. Still, I'll consider it. I've seen the night sky up in the mountains 15 years ago and quite recently and it is such an awful contrast already.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

          Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

          SpaceX is truly awful.

          capnthommo@c.imC This user is from outside of this forum
          capnthommo@c.imC This user is from outside of this forum
          capnthommo@c.im
          wrote last edited by
          #68

          @sundogplanets like throwing a boxful of knives and axes high in the air and hoping they don't hit you on the way back down. With the added joy of the pollutants liberated when many of them burn up on re-entry

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • hundhamm@muenchen.socialH hundhamm@muenchen.social

            @sundogplanets
            Already done:
            https://magazin.tu-braunschweig.de/en/m-post/burned-up-satellite-debris-could-deplete-ozone-layer/

            nom@mk.spook.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            nom@mk.spook.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            nom@mk.spook.social
            wrote last edited by
            #69

            @hundhamm@muenchen.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social The WWW model is silly. I don't need 25ms access except during occasional calls, which can be handled terrestrially.

            Further, I have storage and RAM. Realtime terrestrial broadcast was fine but if you're doing digital data from space "it might as well come from the moon," while cheeky, doesn't seem to be a problem.

            In other words, it's ok if it takes seconds for my netflix video to start. Maybe even minutes if my expectations / cost were set that way.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

              Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

              SpaceX is truly awful.

              werdenfels@troet.cafeW This user is from outside of this forum
              werdenfels@troet.cafeW This user is from outside of this forum
              werdenfels@troet.cafe
              wrote last edited by
              #70

              @sundogplanets not only that. It starts with the launch of the rocket:
              Lots kerosine is burnt.
              The second stage burns up in the atmosphere.
              All that burns up in the atmosphere stays there for quite some time and influences the atmosphere.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                SpaceX is truly awful.

                bicycletting@mastodon.ieB This user is from outside of this forum
                bicycletting@mastodon.ieB This user is from outside of this forum
                bicycletting@mastodon.ie
                wrote last edited by
                #71

                @sundogplanets would that also measurably reduce the efficiency of solar panels?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                  Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                  SpaceX is truly awful.

                  sikorski@oldbytes.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sikorski@oldbytes.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sikorski@oldbytes.space
                  wrote last edited by
                  #72

                  @sundogplanets It is not the metal elements that pose a problem when entering the atmosphere, but the lenses and laser elements that were supposed to provide communication via optical path are resistant to the temperatures generated during atmospheric entry.

                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                    Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                    SpaceX is truly awful.

                    happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                    happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                    happyborg@fosstodon.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #73

                    @sundogplanets

                    The good thing about Starlink satellites is that they don't stay up there long.

                    The bad thing about Starlink satellites is that they don't stay up there long.

                    #Starlink #environment #ElonMusk

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S skaphle@social.tchncs.de

                      @michael_w_busch @Becovich Starlink also has higher ambitions concerning internet speed or bandwidth. I think that also requires more satellites, no?

                      georgweissenbacher@fediscience.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                      georgweissenbacher@fediscience.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                      georgweissenbacher@fediscience.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #74

                      @skaphle @Becovich as @michael_w_busch writes, the problem is not necessarily bandwidth - satellites can provide a very high bandwidth - it is latency. Satellites in geostationary orbit, for instance, have a latency of 1/4 of a second. That’s why Musk’s satellites need to fly low. But that reduces the area they can cover.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sikorski@oldbytes.spaceS sikorski@oldbytes.space

                        @sundogplanets It is not the metal elements that pose a problem when entering the atmosphere, but the lenses and laser elements that were supposed to provide communication via optical path are resistant to the temperatures generated during atmospheric entry.

                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #75

                        @sikorski Do you have a reference for that? Would be extremely useful if you can share!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                          Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                          SpaceX is truly awful.

                          brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          brouhaha@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #76

                          @sundogplanets
                          Once SpaceX causes Kessler Syndrome, making LEO unusable, that will put an end to their Starlink business model for a while.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups