Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Pedantic pet peeve: Trump is not Vance's "boss".

Pedantic pet peeve: Trump is not Vance's "boss".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
19 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS stevebellovin@infosec.exchange

    @mattblaze Yes and no. Yes, vice president is a constitutional office. But the constitutionally assigned duties are very limited and often unsatisfying, hence John Nance Garner's comments (https://briscoecenter.org/about/news/john-nance-garner-on-the-vice-presidency-in-search-of-the-proverbial-bucket/). But recent presidents have assigned other duties to their VPs, and in that sense Trump is Vance's boss, though as you note Vance can't be fired.

    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.social
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @SteveBellovin It's kind of a perfect slacker job. Nice house, secret service protection, VIP travel, can sleep until noon most days unless there's a tie in the Senate

    stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS cstamp@mastodon.socialC grwster@mastodon.socialG 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

      Pedantic pet peeve: Trump is not Vance's "boss". The VP is a separate constitutional office with (a small number of) specific duties (in both the executive and legislative branches) that the president can't direct except as suggestions. The president also can't fire the VP.

      finitum@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      finitum@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      finitum@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @mattblaze part of JDs duties apparently is to do his best impersonation of that little guy that sits by Jabba & laughs at everything he says.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

        @SteveBellovin It's kind of a perfect slacker job. Nice house, secret service protection, VIP travel, can sleep until noon most days unless there's a tie in the Senate

        stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
        stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
        stevebellovin@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @mattblaze See 18 U.S.C. §3056(a): "(a) Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect the following persons:
        (1) The President, the Vice President (or other officer next in the order of succession to the Office of President), the President-elect, and the Vice President-elect." Can the president (or rather, the Secretary at POTUS's direction) withdraw such protection? The statute says "is authorized to", not "shall".

        mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

          @SteveBellovin It's kind of a perfect slacker job. Nice house, secret service protection, VIP travel, can sleep until noon most days unless there's a tie in the Senate

          cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cstamp@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @mattblaze @SteveBellovin A well paid slacker job.

          In this case, though, I’m guessing the VP IS at the whim of the president. Laws and precedent take no place in that admin.

          mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstamp@mastodon.socialC cstamp@mastodon.social

            @mattblaze @SteveBellovin A well paid slacker job.

            In this case, though, I’m guessing the VP IS at the whim of the president. Laws and precedent take no place in that admin.

            mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mattblaze@federate.social
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @CStamp @SteveBellovin Ask Pence...

            cstamp@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

              Pedantic pet peeve: Trump is not Vance's "boss". The VP is a separate constitutional office with (a small number of) specific duties (in both the executive and legislative branches) that the president can't direct except as suggestions. The president also can't fire the VP.

              paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
              paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
              paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @mattblaze

              so no real boss, very few duties, free house. sounds perfect for a slacker with an upholstery fetish. a "cushy" job would be quite the turn-on...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                @SteveBellovin It's kind of a perfect slacker job. Nice house, secret service protection, VIP travel, can sleep until noon most days unless there's a tie in the Senate

                grwster@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grwster@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grwster@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @mattblaze @SteveBellovin I mean, living at the Naval Observatory, I’d be up all night! 😉

                stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS mattblaze@federate.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • grwster@mastodon.socialG grwster@mastodon.social

                  @mattblaze @SteveBellovin I mean, living at the Naval Observatory, I’d be up all night! 😉

                  stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stevebellovin@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @grwster @mattblaze There's too much light pollution in the DC area for good night sky viewing. Trust me—I've tried…

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • stevebellovin@infosec.exchangeS stevebellovin@infosec.exchange

                    @mattblaze See 18 U.S.C. §3056(a): "(a) Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect the following persons:
                    (1) The President, the Vice President (or other officer next in the order of succession to the Office of President), the President-elect, and the Vice President-elect." Can the president (or rather, the Secretary at POTUS's direction) withdraw such protection? The statute says "is authorized to", not "shall".

                    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mattblaze@federate.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @SteveBellovin Hmmm. But interestingly, the President and VP can't decline protection (though other protectees can).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • grwster@mastodon.socialG grwster@mastodon.social

                      @mattblaze @SteveBellovin I mean, living at the Naval Observatory, I’d be up all night! 😉

                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattblaze@federate.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @grwster @SteveBellovin And access to very accurate time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                        @CStamp @SteveBellovin Ask Pence...

                        cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cstamp@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @mattblaze @SteveBellovin Yeah, the one moment he showed a spine and did what was right. Which could've cost him his life after the president blasted him, enraging the base who stormed the WH, with a hanging rope with his name. I'm sure the new guy has that in his mind with his actions.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                          Pedantic pet peeve: Trump is not Vance's "boss". The VP is a separate constitutional office with (a small number of) specific duties (in both the executive and legislative branches) that the president can't direct except as suggestions. The president also can't fire the VP.

                          cazabon@mindly.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cazabon@mindly.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cazabon@mindly.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          @mattblaze

                          Has any president even tried to fire his VP in-office?

                          bunnymama@sfba.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                            Pedantic pet peeve: Trump is not Vance's "boss". The VP is a separate constitutional office with (a small number of) specific duties (in both the executive and legislative branches) that the president can't direct except as suggestions. The president also can't fire the VP.

                            pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pizzademon@mastodon.online
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            @mattblaze Just in case he makes it all the way to the end of term, Vance wants the endorsement.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cazabon@mindly.socialC cazabon@mindly.social

                              @mattblaze

                              Has any president even tried to fire his VP in-office?

                              bunnymama@sfba.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bunnymama@sfba.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bunnymama@sfba.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18

                              @cazabon @mattblaze

                              Spiro Agnew resigned due to being felonious. Does that count? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiro_Agnew

                              cazabon@mindly.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • bunnymama@sfba.socialB bunnymama@sfba.social

                                @cazabon @mattblaze

                                Spiro Agnew resigned due to being felonious. Does that count? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiro_Agnew

                                cazabon@mindly.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cazabon@mindly.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cazabon@mindly.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19

                                @BunnyMama @mattblaze

                                No, I knew about that one, and presidents that have corruptly fired or tried to fire people in the cabinet, like Attorneys General (which the president definitely has the right to do, though it's a bad idea in that case).

                                Nixon basically fired himself to promote Ford to the presidency and give himself a more-or-less graceful exit from the Watergate scandal, but that's not it either 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                0
                                • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                  R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups