Yael's post demonstrates something about digital privacy/security that I think a lot of people miss: there is no right answer, just a series of trade-offs.
-
There is a reason why most of my advice is phrased "If you are concerned about X...you may want to consider doing Y." It's not because I just love using a bunch of extra words.
THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL ADVICE
-
There is a reason why most of my advice is phrased "If you are concerned about X...you may want to consider doing Y." It's not because I just love using a bunch of extra words.
@evacide "if you are concerned about lack of privacy on your phone, you may want to consider throwing it into the sea"
(/j)
-
There is a reason why most of my advice is phrased "If you are concerned about X...you may want to consider doing Y." It's not because I just love using a bunch of extra words.
@evacide Straight to the point
-
@evacide "if you are concerned about lack of privacy on your phone, you may want to consider throwing it into the sea"
(/j)
-
There is a reason why most of my advice is phrased "If you are concerned about X...you may want to consider doing Y." It's not because I just love using a bunch of extra words.
@evacide Do people not understand that? jeez
-
Yael's post demonstrates something about digital privacy/security that I think a lot of people miss: there is no right answer, just a series of trade-offs. And every person has to make their own decisions about which trade-offs are worthwhile. https://blog.yaelwrites.com/options-for-phones-at-protests/
@evacide
" no right answer, just a series of trade-offs."this.
-
There is a reason why most of my advice is phrased "If you are concerned about X...you may want to consider doing Y." It's not because I just love using a bunch of extra words.
@evacide more of a belief in causation of events
-
@evacide Do people not understand that? jeez
@lawyersgunsnmoney @evacide apparently a lot of people use words as if they’re part of some secret code rather than having standard meanings. I suppose it’s like “virtue signaling”, but applying that sort of indirect interpretation to absolutely everything. I think that’s how some people end up making completely absurd arguments in court; they think if they say the right “signals” the court will rule in their favor. I can’t imagine living that way
-
There is a reason why most of my advice is phrased "If you are concerned about X...you may want to consider doing Y." It's not because I just love using a bunch of extra words.
@evacide conscious threat modeling takes effort.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
Yael's post demonstrates something about digital privacy/security that I think a lot of people miss: there is no right answer, just a series of trade-offs. And every person has to make their own decisions about which trade-offs are worthwhile. https://blog.yaelwrites.com/options-for-phones-at-protests/
@evacide Wow so many precautions for a democracy, eh?
-
Yael's post demonstrates something about digital privacy/security that I think a lot of people miss: there is no right answer, just a series of trade-offs. And every person has to make their own decisions about which trade-offs are worthwhile. https://blog.yaelwrites.com/options-for-phones-at-protests/
@evacide
> even if your phone is turned off, it will still send out Bluetooth signals to broadcast its locationwtf? where can I read more about that?
-
N nateb@mastodon.thenewoil.org shared this topic
E em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
