🇩🇪🛑Nein zur #Chatkontrolle: Letzte Woche gab es von diesen EU-Abgeordneten ein Mandat gegen Massenscans.📅 Gerade läuft die finale Trilog-Verhandlungsrunde.
-
Nein zur #Chatkontrolle: Letzte Woche gab es von diesen EU-Abgeordneten ein Mandat gegen Massenscans.
Gerade läuft die finale Trilog-Verhandlungsrunde. Jetzt dürfen die Verhandlungsführer NICHT umfallen!
Quelle: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578
-
Nein zur #Chatkontrolle: Letzte Woche gab es von diesen EU-Abgeordneten ein Mandat gegen Massenscans. Gerade läuft die finale Trilog-Verhandlungsrunde. Jetzt dürfen die Verhandlungsführer NICHT umfallen!
Quelle: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578
No to #ChatControl: last week these MEPs backed a mandate against warrantless mass scanning. The final trilogue round is happening right now—negotiators must NOT cave in.
Check out how your MEPs voted: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578
-
No to #ChatControl: last week these MEPs backed a mandate against warrantless mass scanning. The final trilogue round is happening right now—negotiators must NOT cave in.
Check out how your MEPs voted: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578
Non au #ChatControl : La semaine dernière, ces eurodéputés ont donné un mandat contre les scans indiscriminés. Les négociations finales du trilogue sont en cours en ce moment même. Les négociateurs ne doivent PAS céder maintenant !
Source : https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578
-
Non au #ChatControl : La semaine dernière, ces eurodéputés ont donné un mandat contre les scans indiscriminés. Les négociations finales du trilogue sont en cours en ce moment même. Les négociateurs ne doivent PAS céder maintenant !
Source : https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578
No al #ChatControl: La scorsa settimana, questi eurodeputati hanno dato un mandato contro le scansioni di massa. È in corso proprio ora il round finale di negoziati del trilogo. Ora i negoziatori NON devono cedere!
Fonte: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578
-
No to #ChatControl: last week these MEPs backed a mandate against warrantless mass scanning. The final trilogue round is happening right now—negotiators must NOT cave in.
Check out how your MEPs voted: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578@echo_pbreyer is there any news on the age verification part of chatcontrol? to me it seems almost as bad as mass scanning
-
E em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
No to #ChatControl: last week these MEPs backed a mandate against warrantless mass scanning. The final trilogue round is happening right now—negotiators must NOT cave in.
Check out how your MEPs voted: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578I wanted to just post who voted for and against in my country, but I looked to exact text, and I am suspecting this is misleading info.
Can I reliably use this information to determine who voted against chat control 1.0?
Because all parties voted to preserve end-to-end-encryption with "Amendment 1",
and "Amendment 2" (another one) is worded quite similarly to "Amendment 5" (this one), where all parties also voted for it (except I see double voting for the 2nd amendment text which makes things extra unclear).So, is this presented vote for "Amendment 5" a reliable way to tell who voted against chat control 1.0?
P.S. full text of regulation (context) is not visible on the websites, making things unclear as well.
-
Nein zur #Chatkontrolle: Letzte Woche gab es von diesen EU-Abgeordneten ein Mandat gegen Massenscans. Gerade läuft die finale Trilog-Verhandlungsrunde. Jetzt dürfen die Verhandlungsführer NICHT umfallen!
Quelle: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578@echo_pbreyer wie wirken denn die Enthaltungen? Zählen die wie ein Nein oder zählt am Ende nur das Verhältnis Ja/Nein?
-
I wanted to just post who voted for and against in my country, but I looked to exact text, and I am suspecting this is misleading info.
Can I reliably use this information to determine who voted against chat control 1.0?
Because all parties voted to preserve end-to-end-encryption with "Amendment 1",
and "Amendment 2" (another one) is worded quite similarly to "Amendment 5" (this one), where all parties also voted for it (except I see double voting for the 2nd amendment text which makes things extra unclear).So, is this presented vote for "Amendment 5" a reliable way to tell who voted against chat control 1.0?
P.S. full text of regulation (context) is not visible on the websites, making things unclear as well.
@mindaugas @echo_pbreyer The key in Patricks post seems to be
> MEPs backed a mandate against warrantless mass scanning.
Am 5 was the one adding this (limitation to targeted users) into the text. Here's the link to the PDF containing Am 5: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040-AM-004-006_EN.pdf
I hope this makes things clearer?
-
M mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social shared this topic
