"10 low-cost, no-cost options" is such a weird way of constraining what actions should be taken to protect undersea cables.
-
"10 low-cost, no-cost options" is such a weird way of constraining what actions should be taken to protect undersea cables. It's so weird I feel like it might have been mis-reported. "I run a bank with a lot gold inside and I've asked the locksmith to provide some really cheap locks"
The need is very clear, both in terms of the possible attacks and the impact on the economy if attacks were successful, so I'm pleased steps are being taken but I'd prefer the selection of steps wasn't entirely based on them being cheap.
-
"10 low-cost, no-cost options" is such a weird way of constraining what actions should be taken to protect undersea cables. It's so weird I feel like it might have been mis-reported. "I run a bank with a lot gold inside and I've asked the locksmith to provide some really cheap locks"
The need is very clear, both in terms of the possible attacks and the impact on the economy if attacks were successful, so I'm pleased steps are being taken but I'd prefer the selection of steps wasn't entirely based on them being cheap.
@shearichard it's such classic shit manager-think. Quick wins. Low-hanging fruit. Etc. -
"10 low-cost, no-cost options" is such a weird way of constraining what actions should be taken to protect undersea cables. It's so weird I feel like it might have been mis-reported. "I run a bank with a lot gold inside and I've asked the locksmith to provide some really cheap locks"
The need is very clear, both in terms of the possible attacks and the impact on the economy if attacks were successful, so I'm pleased steps are being taken but I'd prefer the selection of steps wasn't entirely based on them being cheap.
@shearichard Let me guess: Not a single one of them includes bringing all applications and data onshore.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
