Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
21 Posts 19 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

    It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

    sudo_eatpant@critter.cafeS This user is from outside of this forum
    sudo_eatpant@critter.cafeS This user is from outside of this forum
    sudo_eatpant@critter.cafe
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @david_chisnall Macroslop, perhaps? :3

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

      It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

      datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      datarama@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @david_chisnall Well, is it really more wrong than implying a small quantity of software?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

        It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

        albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
        albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
        albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @david_chisnall

        I always thought "Micro" and "soft" already said a lot.

        mrgrumpymonkey@mastodon.socialM titia@toot.communityT 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • cr1901@mastodon.socialC cr1901@mastodon.social

          @david_chisnall So much slop it needs to be split into SLOP~1, SLOP~2, etc

          datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          datarama@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @cr1901 @david_chisnall Also, MICROS~1 covers both their current monikers!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

            It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

            houba@spore.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            houba@spore.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            houba@spore.social
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @david_chisnall

            I'm sure the people on discord could get a little traction out of Macroslop before they ban that.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
            • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

              It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

              staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              staringatclouds@mstdn.social
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @david_chisnall Macroslop ?

              Megaslop ?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

                schtaks@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                schtaks@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                schtaks@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @david_chisnall Wumboslop

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cr1901@mastodon.socialC cr1901@mastodon.social

                  @david_chisnall So much slop it needs to be split into SLOP~1, SLOP~2, etc

                  lockex@ioc.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lockex@ioc.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lockex@ioc.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @cr1901 @david_chisnall US-SLOP-EAST-1

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                    It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

                    atax1a@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                    atax1a@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                    atax1a@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @david_chisnall how about this:

                    Sloplord

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                      It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

                      theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
                      theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
                      theorangetheme@en.osm.town
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @david_chisnall slop32. Winslop.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                        It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

                        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @david_chisnall

                        so true!

                        shall we start trying to promote a more accurate Macroslop whenever we refer to the gates launched agony?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                          It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

                          synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                          synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                          synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @david_chisnall Megaslop

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                            It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

                            ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
                            ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
                            ggmcbg@mstdn.plus
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            @david_chisnall

                            Sloprosoft has a nice mouth feel.

                            bovaz@misskey.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                              It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

                              mrgrumpymonkey@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mrgrumpymonkey@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mrgrumpymonkey@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              @david_chisnall What do you expect us to call the business? MacroSlop?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                                @david_chisnall

                                I always thought "Micro" and "soft" already said a lot.

                                mrgrumpymonkey@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrgrumpymonkey@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrgrumpymonkey@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                @albertcardona @david_chisnall Have to compensate somehow.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                                  It is completely unfair to refer to Microsoft as Microslop, because that implies a small quantity of slop.

                                  tuutw@mastodon.nlT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tuutw@mastodon.nlT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tuutw@mastodon.nl
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @david_chisnall Right, the sole correct wording is Macroslop.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                                    @david_chisnall

                                    I always thought "Micro" and "soft" already said a lot.

                                    titia@toot.communityT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    titia@toot.communityT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    titia@toot.community
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @albertcardona @david_chisnall yes, that was what his (now ex-)wife said on their wedding night.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG ggmcbg@mstdn.plus

                                      @david_chisnall

                                      Sloprosoft has a nice mouth feel.

                                      bovaz@misskey.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bovaz@misskey.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bovaz@misskey.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21
                                      @GGMcBG@mstdn.plus @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange sounds like something we would need umbrellas for
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups