Does your ISP support IPv6?

[toroidalcore@masto.hackers.town]

@AliciaBytes Not great, but not terrible.

[toroidalcore@masto.hackers.town]

@dch That's too bad, I guess they consider it an 'enterprise' feature so it's gotta cost more...

[viccie30@hachyderm.io]

@toroidalcore A /60 would probably work for me, I don't have that many subnets, but it gives me room to expand my network if necessary. And the /48 allows me to neatly map a /64 to each VLAN.
I have one fixed IPv4 address as well and if I pay extra I can get a /29 as well, but I don't need that (yet).

[toroidalcore@masto.hackers.town]

@viccie30 I've got subnets, but not too many at the moment. The extras would be handy and I could probably find something for them eventually.

I haven't looked into getting extra IPv4 at my current ISP, but at least I do get one public one. I'm planning on switching to a fiber ISP and will give that up, but at least they also give out a /60. They' re a little cheaper, but I guess I could get a public IPv4 from them and pay about what I pay now.

[itsozgur@fosstodon.org]

@toroidalcore yes, but I have more latency with IPv6 :)))) (about 9ms to 20ms compared) and so they are very much lax about it.

[toroidalcore@masto.hackers.town]

@itsozgur Interesting.

[paul@notnull.space]

@toroidalcore yes, but I purposely signed up to them because they are one of the few in my country that do.
Even so, i had to ask them to enable it

[amrtf@social.amr.tf]

@toroidalcore Yes and no

Telefónica España supports IPv6 only on mobile network, it seems that in households they’re having problems to offer it

[toroidalcore@masto.hackers.town]

@amrtf It seems like mobile providers were a little quicker to catch on with IPv6. I think Verizon here had it on mobile before residential.

[lili@donotsta.re]

@toroidalcore neither of these two options! it clearly has IPv6 websites but the tech support people lie to my face that they don't have it

[jonossaseuraava@post.ebin.club]

@toroidalcore
isp in general? yes. With my museum tech internet? no.

[revk@toot.me.uk]

@dch @toroidalcore wow

[revk@toot.me.uk]

@toroidalcore we, @aaisp, have for a very long time.

[sleepytako@famichiki.jp]

@theraspb @toroidalcore my isp (Rakuten Hikari, Western Japan, NTT West backbone) just sent me the email to change some settings to allow v6 last week. I'm gonna do it when I feel like it.

[kalleboo@bitbang.social]

@toroidalcore My ISP is IPv6-native, and IPv4 is provided over a MAP-E tunnel, so to get IPv4 working you need a router with support for MAP-E. Domestic consumer routers support it, but e.g. Ubiquiti and OpenWrt only very recently gained support.

I pay an extra $5/mo for a public+static IPv4, otherwise you’re stuck being CGNAT where you get a pseudo-random range of ports forwarded.

$35/mo for 10 gigabit fiber.

[arroz@mastodon.social]

@toroidalcore There’s an option missing: yes on fibre, no on mobile. As weird as that may seem.

[muvlon@hachyderm.io]

@toroidalcore Residential: yes (but you need to opt-in via their customer portal)
Mobile: no (CGNAT all the way baby)

[cyb3rrunn3r@cyb3rrunn3r.de]

@toroidalcore@masto.hackers.town Don´t know.
Maybe i am too dumb to activate this.

[mkj@social.mkj.earth]

IPv6 support was among my selection criteria when I choose my current ISP.

@toroidalcore

[tristan@tech.lgbt]

@toroidalcore annoyingly CenturyLink _used_ to halfass this with a 6rd tunnel. they got acquired by Lumen (now AT&T) and 6rd is completely broken and i’ve been told “it was a coincidence it worked to begin with”