Fossil companies partly dropping their CCS ambitions aligns with my theory of their adoption.
-
Fossil companies partly dropping their CCS ambitions aligns with my theory of their adoption. If the "targets" were put in place to fend off scrutiny and regulation, why keep them when there's no longer any threat of scrutiny or regulation?
Equinor were *never* planning to recapture their toxic waste. We already knew this

-
Fossil companies partly dropping their CCS ambitions aligns with my theory of their adoption. If the "targets" were put in place to fend off scrutiny and regulation, why keep them when there's no longer any threat of scrutiny or regulation?
Equinor were *never* planning to recapture their toxic waste. We already knew this

@ketan @aj seeking to understand: if you've got a problem with Equinor, why is it fine & cool for the Australia Institute to encourage Australia to be like Norway, home of Equinor, whose taxes they rely on?
Norway needs to ditch the fossil fuel exports, as does Australia, not keep them around paying tax. Years ago, but tomorrow if anyone will have a chance of survival.
#Norway #Australia #Equinor -
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topicR relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic