Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Apparently chardet got Claude to rewrite the entire codebase from LGPL to MIT?

Apparently chardet got Claude to rewrite the entire codebase from LGPL to MIT?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
92 Posts 53 Posters 204 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

    @Foxboron It looks like this was the PR?

    Link Preview Image
    chardet 7.0: ground-up MIT-licensed rewrite by dan-blanchard · Pull Request #322 · chardet/chardet

    Python character encoding detector. Contribute to chardet/chardet development by creating an account on GitHub.

    favicon

    GitHub (github.com)

    Even aside from the ethical and moral issues with LLMs, it doesn't seem optimal that a 15k line PR affecting almost a million dependent repos (if GitHub's count is to be believed) was up for three days before getting merged in.

    foxboron@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    foxboron@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    foxboron@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #80

    @xgranade
    They have been the upstream maintainer for years, so I don't see any huge issue with that.

    I would have done the same probably?

    xgranade@wandering.shopX 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

      @xgranade
      They have been the upstream maintainer for years, so I don't see any huge issue with that.

      I would have done the same probably?

      xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
      xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
      xgranade@wandering.shop
      wrote last edited by
      #81

      @Foxboron Posted an unkind reply and deleted, sorry. I'm getting frustrated with the whole AI thing today, and I'm not being my best self. I should probably just step offline for a bit.

      This is just so... frustrating.

      foxboron@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

        @scy
        US court is leaning towards that LLM generated code is fundamentally not copyrightable.

        This is a different problem to the moral issues I have with this.

        jti42@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jti42@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jti42@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #82

        @Foxboron @scy@chaos.social That'd be the US system. Then there's the various Euro systems that differ substantially. I'm certainly curious how this will turn out.

        On the other hand: it'd require that those who can enforce their rights here actually do so.
        Given that IP rights are normally enforced pretty harshly, even on consumers (anyone remember the days of the torrent c&d letters or the traditional find&ban the infringing exhibitor days on computex et al?) they're effectively completely ignored on FOSS.
        There is virtually no education for biz, cs or law students on this topic, let alone mandatory ed.

        Presenting the case of possibilities and rights to those who have them is often dismissed by those, especially developers on the younger side or those who are still in a "hobby" / "non commercial" stage. Only to shortly after complain about sustainability and demanding funding.

        Instead we see demands to throw substantial amounts of tax money after random Foss projects on more or less random criteria and evaluators. Which will totally scale, right?

        Virtually every company that was enforced against in terms of FOSS compliance ended up consciously allocating resources to FOSS in various ways. There are a lot of companies and they are a renewable resource in a functional economy.

        But what do I know, rite? I just see the cases.
        /rant

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

          Apparently chardet got Claude to rewrite the entire codebase from LGPL to MIT?

          Link Preview Image
          Release 7.0.0 · chardet/chardet

          Python character encoding detector. Contribute to chardet/chardet development by creating an account on GitHub.

          favicon

          GitHub (github.com)

          That is one way to launder GPL code I guess?

          jti42@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jti42@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jti42@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #83

          @Foxboron today's new term "code laundering" I'll keep that one 😆

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

            @Foxboron Posted an unkind reply and deleted, sorry. I'm getting frustrated with the whole AI thing today, and I'm not being my best self. I should probably just step offline for a bit.

            This is just so... frustrating.

            foxboron@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            foxboron@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            foxboron@chaos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #84

            @xgranade
            Yes.

            But lets not clutch pearls over how a understaffed FOSS project decides to merge their work.

            davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

              @scy
              US court is leaning towards that LLM generated code is fundamentally not copyrightable.

              This is a different problem to the moral issues I have with this.

              kekunplazas@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
              kekunplazas@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
              kekunplazas@mamot.fr
              wrote last edited by
              #85

              @Foxboron @scy So it's not copyrightable, what are they using to apply the MIT license if not their copyright‽ That makes no sense to me. (I'm reacting to you but to what you shared, to be clear.)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

                Apparently chardet got Claude to rewrite the entire codebase from LGPL to MIT?

                Link Preview Image
                Release 7.0.0 · chardet/chardet

                Python character encoding detector. Contribute to chardet/chardet development by creating an account on GitHub.

                favicon

                GitHub (github.com)

                That is one way to launder GPL code I guess?

                wolfcoder@lagopine.lgbtW This user is from outside of this forum
                wolfcoder@lagopine.lgbtW This user is from outside of this forum
                wolfcoder@lagopine.lgbt
                wrote last edited by
                #86

                @Foxboron more like laundered without emptying the lint trap, can't imagine the bugs and vulns a whole AI re-write would do.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

                  Apparently chardet got Claude to rewrite the entire codebase from LGPL to MIT?

                  Link Preview Image
                  Release 7.0.0 · chardet/chardet

                  Python character encoding detector. Contribute to chardet/chardet development by creating an account on GitHub.

                  favicon

                  GitHub (github.com)

                  That is one way to launder GPL code I guess?

                  foxboron@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  foxboron@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  foxboron@chaos.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #87

                  Seems like the original author saw this as well.

                  Link Preview Image
                  No right to relicense this project · Issue #327 · chardet/chardet

                  Hi, I'm Mark Pilgrim. You may remember me from such classics as "Dive Into Python" and "Universal Character Encoding Detector." I am the original author of chardet. First off, I would like to thank the current maintainers and everyone wh...

                  favicon

                  GitHub (github.com)

                  Please do not brigade the project.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

                    Apparently chardet got Claude to rewrite the entire codebase from LGPL to MIT?

                    Link Preview Image
                    Release 7.0.0 · chardet/chardet

                    Python character encoding detector. Contribute to chardet/chardet development by creating an account on GitHub.

                    favicon

                    GitHub (github.com)

                    That is one way to launder GPL code I guess?

                    orca@nya.oneO This user is from outside of this forum
                    orca@nya.oneO This user is from outside of this forum
                    orca@nya.one
                    wrote last edited by
                    #88
                    @Foxboron@chaos.social
                    Rewrite the entire codebase
                    Argh I can see a disaster coming
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

                      @xgranade
                      Yes.

                      But lets not clutch pearls over how a understaffed FOSS project decides to merge their work.

                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                      davidgerard@circumstances.run
                      wrote last edited by
                      #89

                      @Foxboron @xgranade If it was solely his work, he could just change the license. He didn't do that - he felt he had to AI-wash it. That suggests there is in fact other people's work in there that he's trying to AI-wash away their copyright.

                      foxboron@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                        @Foxboron @xgranade If it was solely his work, he could just change the license. He didn't do that - he felt he had to AI-wash it. That suggests there is in fact other people's work in there that he's trying to AI-wash away their copyright.

                        foxboron@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        foxboron@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        foxboron@chaos.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #90

                        @davidgerard @xgranade

                        I'm just making a claim that we can't fault people for how they on their pull requests work.

                        For the point you are raising see this issue from 13 years ago.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Changing license · Issue #36 · chardet/chardet

                        This feels strange to be posing as a question, since I'm one of the co-maintainers, but @sigmavirus24 and @erikrose, do you know if it's okay/legal for us to change the license of chardet? Because it was started by Mark Pilgrim I feel li...

                        favicon

                        GitHub (github.com)

                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

                          @davidgerard @xgranade

                          I'm just making a claim that we can't fault people for how they on their pull requests work.

                          For the point you are raising see this issue from 13 years ago.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Changing license · Issue #36 · chardet/chardet

                          This feels strange to be posing as a question, since I'm one of the co-maintainers, but @sigmavirus24 and @erikrose, do you know if it's okay/legal for us to change the license of chardet? Because it was started by Mark Pilgrim I feel li...

                          favicon

                          GitHub (github.com)

                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidgerard@circumstances.run
                          wrote last edited by
                          #91

                          @Foxboron @xgranade right, confirming the issue I raised.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • foxboron@chaos.socialF foxboron@chaos.social

                            Apparently chardet got Claude to rewrite the entire codebase from LGPL to MIT?

                            Link Preview Image
                            Release 7.0.0 · chardet/chardet

                            Python character encoding detector. Contribute to chardet/chardet development by creating an account on GitHub.

                            favicon

                            GitHub (github.com)

                            That is one way to launder GPL code I guess?

                            njsg@mementomori.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            njsg@mementomori.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            njsg@mementomori.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #92

                            @Foxboron [grabs cp(1) code from some implementation]
                            [compiles but installs it as cp.ai]
                            [chardet-fork: release 1.0: AI-based ground-up rewrite of chardet, public domain]

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups