Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. This is @samueloph being asked to revert to the pre-vibe rsync in Debiam.

This is @samueloph being asked to revert to the pre-vibe rsync in Debiam.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
6 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • icing@chaos.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    icing@chaos.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    icing@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    This is @samueloph being asked to revert to the pre-vibe rsync in Debiam.

    @ariadne plans to switch to openrsync in Alpine.

    Important decisions to be made here.

    It‘s about trust, not technology. rsync has earned trust over the years. Now it has increased changes using Claude with no second person reviewing.

    That people feel uneasy about this, for a tool that copies exabytes of important data every day, is very understandable.

    The LLM is the minor player here.

    link in replies

    lucawantstobeacat@chaos.socialL max@peering.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
    2
    0
    • icing@chaos.socialI icing@chaos.social

      This is @samueloph being asked to revert to the pre-vibe rsync in Debiam.

      @ariadne plans to switch to openrsync in Alpine.

      Important decisions to be made here.

      It‘s about trust, not technology. rsync has earned trust over the years. Now it has increased changes using Claude with no second person reviewing.

      That people feel uneasy about this, for a tool that copies exabytes of important data every day, is very understandable.

      The LLM is the minor player here.

      link in replies

      lucawantstobeacat@chaos.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      lucawantstobeacat@chaos.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      lucawantstobeacat@chaos.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @icing link 404s for me?

      trilader@chaos.socialT keithzg@fediverse.keithzg.caK 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • lucawantstobeacat@chaos.socialL lucawantstobeacat@chaos.social

        @icing link 404s for me?

        trilader@chaos.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        trilader@chaos.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        trilader@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @lucawantstobeacat @icing Link contains some leftover HTML from copying it I guess. This works: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1138239

        icing@chaos.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • lucawantstobeacat@chaos.socialL lucawantstobeacat@chaos.social

          @icing link 404s for me?

          keithzg@fediverse.keithzg.caK This user is from outside of this forum
          keithzg@fediverse.keithzg.caK This user is from outside of this forum
          keithzg@fediverse.keithzg.ca
          wrote last edited by
          #4
          @lucawantstobeacat @icing Me too, here's a less broken link: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1138239
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • trilader@chaos.socialT trilader@chaos.social

            @lucawantstobeacat @icing Link contains some leftover HTML from copying it I guess. This works: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1138239

            icing@chaos.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            icing@chaos.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            icing@chaos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @trilader @lucawantstobeacat thanks! ivory for some reason effs up the link, I think.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
            • icing@chaos.socialI icing@chaos.social

              This is @samueloph being asked to revert to the pre-vibe rsync in Debiam.

              @ariadne plans to switch to openrsync in Alpine.

              Important decisions to be made here.

              It‘s about trust, not technology. rsync has earned trust over the years. Now it has increased changes using Claude with no second person reviewing.

              That people feel uneasy about this, for a tool that copies exabytes of important data every day, is very understandable.

              The LLM is the minor player here.

              link in replies

              max@peering.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              max@peering.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              max@peering.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @icing @samueloph @ariadne Also means test-coverage is broken.

              This is about AI-slop, but also about lack of accountability and a broken review process.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups