Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "I just found out that it's been hallucinating numbers this entire time."

"I just found out that it's been hallucinating numbers this entire time."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
techagenticai
157 Posts 132 Posters 6 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G gerardthornley@hachyderm.io

    @ktneely @lxskllr @GreatBigTable
    I think AI is technically a scrape goat. πŸ˜€

    cybervegan@autistics.lifeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cybervegan@autistics.lifeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cybervegan@autistics.life
    wrote last edited by
    #147

    @GerardThornley @ktneely @lxskllr @GreatBigTable Eggcorn?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R robinadams@mathstodon.xyz

      @Fragarach @lxskllr @Natasha_Jay Maybe this one? Monkeys not parrots. https://www.marketsentiment.co/p/the-monkeys-that-beat-the-market

      fragarach@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
      fragarach@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
      fragarach@social.vivaldi.net
      wrote last edited by
      #148

      @robinadams @lxskllr @Natasha_Jay

      That's really interesting, thank you for that!
      The one I'd been thinking of was much less rigorous and thorough. I had no idea so much effort had gone into those comparisons.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • afilina@phpc.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        afilina@phpc.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        afilina@phpc.social
        wrote last edited by
        #149

        @Natasha_Jay Or they made bad decisions and are now blaming an LLM, because this excuse can help dodge responsibility. It's like blaming an intern.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • _maleficentgirl@troet.cafe_ This user is from outside of this forum
          _maleficentgirl@troet.cafe_ This user is from outside of this forum
          _maleficentgirl@troet.cafe
          wrote last edited by
          #150

          @Natasha_Jay

          🍿😈

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • zenheathen@beige.partyZ zenheathen@beige.party

            @Natasha_Jay An organization which trusts this tech enough to simply implement without a changeover period during which the results now given are getting checked against old methods... simply deserves what it gets.

            gunstick@mastodon.opencloud.luG This user is from outside of this forum
            gunstick@mastodon.opencloud.luG This user is from outside of this forum
            gunstick@mastodon.opencloud.lu
            wrote last edited by
            #151

            @ZenHeathen @Natasha_Jay but the new numbers are so much better!!!! πŸ€ͺ

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
              stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
              stuart@social.brainsys.com
              wrote last edited by
              #152

              @Natasha_Jay

              K don't understand what has happened here. Please help me.

              One of my jobs was crunching data for senior management reports. A job that would be automated today. Producing metrics implies you are transforming raw numbers into meaningful trends and forecasts.

              Where was the invention? Was it in the input or transformation? Both should have guardrails. In other words the ai could, for instsnce, be using the wrong statistical analysis to produce the wrong results. But that's an error not an hallucination. People do it too.

              I've had hallucinations but if you require ai to show sources you soon spot made-up stuff. Trouble is when the sources are unchecked ai generated (ai slop). That's just beginning.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • catbrainz@retro.pizzaC catbrainz@retro.pizza

                @Natasha_Jay what seemed crazy to me reading the comments on the reddit post is that so many answers were like "no you can't do it that way, you need to <bunch of extra, convoluted and unnecessary work> to use that tool properly in that context" and to me it's like ok so.....you have to jump through all those hoops to justify using a tool that doesn't actually make anything easier for you.....why? To look like you're following innovation? God I'm glad I no longer work anywhere remotely related to tech right now.

                catbrainz@retro.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                catbrainz@retro.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                catbrainz@retro.pizza
                wrote last edited by
                #153

                @Natasha_Jay also funny some people think a paper trail will prevent this person from getting fired, as if HR gave a shit about actually protecting workers from bad management and weren't champions of spinning anything in the favor of whoever they have to side with.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  softwaretheron@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #154

                  @Natasha_Jay
                  So they just... adopted a new process, and accepted whatever they were told?

                  Without checking?

                  Those people should not be managing anything.

                  Because they *never have*.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • herrlorenz@chaos.socialH herrlorenz@chaos.social

                    @Natasha_Jay It's like a maths professor who played the lottery for years, and then one day sat down to actually look at it...?

                    essjayjay@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                    essjayjay@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                    essjayjay@tech.lgbt
                    wrote last edited by
                    #155

                    @herrLorenz

                    And found out that it's just a tax on greed and stupidity?

                    @Natasha_Jay

                    herrlorenz@chaos.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • essjayjay@tech.lgbtE essjayjay@tech.lgbt

                      @herrLorenz

                      And found out that it's just a tax on greed and stupidity?

                      @Natasha_Jay

                      herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      herrlorenz@chaos.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #156

                      @essjayjay @Natasha_Jay

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • taurus@thicc.horseT taurus@thicc.horse

                        @cmthiede @Natasha_Jay @jwdt hm surely the investors then pulls out the "due diligence" argument.

                        If you are so stupid to trust an AI and even more stupid of expecting other people to pay for that then surely you're lacking above mentioned due diligence and are unable to lead a company

                        jwdt@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jwdt@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jwdt@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #157

                        @taurus @cmthiede @Natasha_Jay at that point the investors are doing the same thing to pump it up so they can sell it on to someone else so they're not holding the bag.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups