Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. People pontificating about whether codebases containing LLM-generated code are subject to IP protection all seem to be forgetting the key point that the law always sides with capital

People pontificating about whether codebases containing LLM-generated code are subject to IP protection all seem to be forgetting the key point that the law always sides with capital

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
19 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • krzyzanowskim@mastodon.socialK krzyzanowskim@mastodon.social

    @nicklockwood as a human. I hate it.

    nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nicklockwood@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    @krzyzanowskim if I were a human, I would simply become a rich human, then all my problems would be solved

    jzilske@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

      Sure there will be some border skirmishes where IP owner interests clash, but in the end the law will settle on whatever makes the people who pay the lawmakers happy

      Instead of trying to read legal precedents like tea leaves, just ask yourself who benefits?

      Does big tech benefit from the commons being able to legally appropriate their IP because they used AI in its creation?

      Obviously not

      So that obviously won't happen

      nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nicklockwood@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      The handwringing about the implications for open source codebases is also especially hilarious

      I'm sorry to be the one to break this to you, but the answer to the question "does this mean people can now take my MIT-licensed code without attribution if I used a coding assistant?" is that they were already doing that, long before LLMs

      If you're lucky, that will continue to be the case. If you're unlucky, then everyone will just vibe code their own solutions and your project will die in obscurity

      frankreiff@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

        Sure there will be some border skirmishes where IP owner interests clash, but in the end the law will settle on whatever makes the people who pay the lawmakers happy

        Instead of trying to read legal precedents like tea leaves, just ask yourself who benefits?

        Does big tech benefit from the commons being able to legally appropriate their IP because they used AI in its creation?

        Obviously not

        So that obviously won't happen

        matthew@mastodon.me.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
        matthew@mastodon.me.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
        matthew@mastodon.me.uk
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @nicklockwood
        I wonder if this might scare the big companies though… the kinds of places whose legal teams are terrified of the GPL?

        nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

          The handwringing about the implications for open source codebases is also especially hilarious

          I'm sorry to be the one to break this to you, but the answer to the question "does this mean people can now take my MIT-licensed code without attribution if I used a coding assistant?" is that they were already doing that, long before LLMs

          If you're lucky, that will continue to be the case. If you're unlucky, then everyone will just vibe code their own solutions and your project will die in obscurity

          frankreiff@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          frankreiff@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          frankreiff@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @nicklockwood Yeah.. but at least you’ll know that somewhere in the code slop your MIT licensed code will have contributed a few weights in that GPU you can no longer afford 😜

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

            People pontificating about whether codebases containing LLM-generated code are subject to IP protection all seem to be forgetting the key point that the law always sides with capital

            When big media decided that pirating an mp3 file should be a criminal (not civil) offence, the law sided with them

            When big tech decided that pirating every piece of media on the internet for AI training was fair use, the law sided with them

            lapcatsoftware@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lapcatsoftware@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lapcatsoftware@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @nicklockwood This is why, when people mourn “the rule of law,” I wonder WTF they’re talking about.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

              @krzyzanowskim if I were a human, I would simply become a rich human, then all my problems would be solved

              jzilske@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jzilske@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jzilske@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @nicklockwood @krzyzanowskim “simply” 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • matthew@mastodon.me.ukM matthew@mastodon.me.uk

                @nicklockwood
                I wonder if this might scare the big companies though… the kinds of places whose legal teams are terrified of the GPL?

                nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nicklockwood@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @matthew Spotify just announced that their developers haven't written a line of code in months. How big of a company are we taking about?

                matthew@mastodon.me.ukM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

                  @matthew Spotify just announced that their developers haven't written a line of code in months. How big of a company are we taking about?

                  matthew@mastodon.me.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                  matthew@mastodon.me.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                  matthew@mastodon.me.uk
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @nicklockwood
                  Oof, that’s a sobering thought.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

                    People pontificating about whether codebases containing LLM-generated code are subject to IP protection all seem to be forgetting the key point that the law always sides with capital

                    When big media decided that pirating an mp3 file should be a criminal (not civil) offence, the law sided with them

                    When big tech decided that pirating every piece of media on the internet for AI training was fair use, the law sided with them

                    brandonscript@appdot.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brandonscript@appdot.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brandonscript@appdot.net
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @nicklockwood nailed it

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

                      People pontificating about whether codebases containing LLM-generated code are subject to IP protection all seem to be forgetting the key point that the law always sides with capital

                      When big media decided that pirating an mp3 file should be a criminal (not civil) offence, the law sided with them

                      When big tech decided that pirating every piece of media on the internet for AI training was fair use, the law sided with them

                      agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      agowa338@chaos.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @nicklockwood

                      Thankfully the later one is not yet over as there are also a lot of capital interests opposing this interpretation. Lawsuits are still ongoing...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

                        People pontificating about whether codebases containing LLM-generated code are subject to IP protection all seem to be forgetting the key point that the law always sides with capital

                        When big media decided that pirating an mp3 file should be a criminal (not civil) offence, the law sided with them

                        When big tech decided that pirating every piece of media on the internet for AI training was fair use, the law sided with them

                        ashley@digipres.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ashley@digipres.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ashley@digipres.club
                        wrote last edited by
                        #17

                        @nicklockwood just had to do a copyright lecture for a class I teach last week (a/v preservation) and it's hard for me to convey importance of precedent while also knowing capital is the only thing that matterssssss!!!

                        ashley@digipres.clubA 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • ashley@digipres.clubA ashley@digipres.club

                          @nicklockwood just had to do a copyright lecture for a class I teach last week (a/v preservation) and it's hard for me to convey importance of precedent while also knowing capital is the only thing that matterssssss!!!

                          ashley@digipres.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ashley@digipres.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ashley@digipres.club
                          wrote last edited by
                          #18

                          @nicklockwood just ended up spending a long time talking about Sony and Universal beefing over VTRs

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                          • nicklockwood@mastodon.socialN nicklockwood@mastodon.social

                            People pontificating about whether codebases containing LLM-generated code are subject to IP protection all seem to be forgetting the key point that the law always sides with capital

                            When big media decided that pirating an mp3 file should be a criminal (not civil) offence, the law sided with them

                            When big tech decided that pirating every piece of media on the internet for AI training was fair use, the law sided with them

                            yora@mastodon.gamedev.placeY This user is from outside of this forum
                            yora@mastodon.gamedev.placeY This user is from outside of this forum
                            yora@mastodon.gamedev.place
                            wrote last edited by
                            #19

                            @nicklockwood That's not law. That's tyranny.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups