Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. ‘A good way of dealing with overpopulation’: Epstein files reveal how the rich fuel climate denialism | Article by Kristin Toussaint for @FastCompany:

‘A good way of dealing with overpopulation’: Epstein files reveal how the rich fuel climate denialism | Article by Kristin Toussaint for @FastCompany:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
5 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • michaelemann@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    michaelemann@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    michaelemann@fediscience.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    ‘A good way of dealing with overpopulation’: Epstein files reveal how the rich fuel climate denialism | Article by Kristin Toussaint for @FastCompany:

    fastcompany.com

    favicon

    (www.fastcompany.com)

    Link Preview Image
    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG lemonlolita@calckey.worldL bubblegumyeti@mastodon.socialB 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • michaelemann@fediscience.orgM michaelemann@fediscience.org

      ‘A good way of dealing with overpopulation’: Epstein files reveal how the rich fuel climate denialism | Article by Kristin Toussaint for @FastCompany:

      fastcompany.com

      favicon

      (www.fastcompany.com)

      Link Preview Image
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @MichaelEMann @FastCompany

      Oh right because 3° warmer is going to work out the way these rich people think it is.

      When the climate volatility diminished about 12,000 years ago, agriculture was able to evolve over 3000 years or so into the form we think defines agriculture. The reason why it started to emerging or evolving in certain ways is because the climate was stable.

      We don’t live in that climate anymore

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • michaelemann@fediscience.orgM michaelemann@fediscience.org

        ‘A good way of dealing with overpopulation’: Epstein files reveal how the rich fuel climate denialism | Article by Kristin Toussaint for @FastCompany:

        fastcompany.com

        favicon

        (www.fastcompany.com)

        Link Preview Image
        lemonlolita@calckey.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
        lemonlolita@calckey.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
        lemonlolita@calckey.world
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @MichaelEMann@fediscience.org @FastCompany@flipboard.com
        Unless you're suggesting we burn the Epstein Class as fuel I don't see how knowing their going this helps!
        Please note I am not saying I'm against burning them as fuel and/or eating them as food!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • michaelemann@fediscience.orgM michaelemann@fediscience.org

          ‘A good way of dealing with overpopulation’: Epstein files reveal how the rich fuel climate denialism | Article by Kristin Toussaint for @FastCompany:

          fastcompany.com

          favicon

          (www.fastcompany.com)

          Link Preview Image
          bubblegumyeti@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bubblegumyeti@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bubblegumyeti@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @MichaelEMann @FastCompany well given their ridiculous wealth, they have a good chance to be the last one standing. I guess they don't care that the planet that is left is probably uninhabitable. They probably expect their ofspring can last a few 100 more years.

          reggiehere@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • bubblegumyeti@mastodon.socialB bubblegumyeti@mastodon.social

            @MichaelEMann @FastCompany well given their ridiculous wealth, they have a good chance to be the last one standing. I guess they don't care that the planet that is left is probably uninhabitable. They probably expect their ofspring can last a few 100 more years.

            reggiehere@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            reggiehere@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            reggiehere@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @BubblegumYeti

            Imagine living in a depopulated world in which wealth no longer matters, and then discovering that your only discernible talent was to be born wealthy.....

            @MichaelEMann @FastCompany

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups