Well, I have now been quoted calling SpaceX "fuckweasels" in a real publication by real journalists: https://au.pcmag.com/ai/116598/spacex-to-start-small-with-1-million-satellite-plan-pushes-back-on-critics

[technicaladept@techhub.social]

@transfemmegabriellamontez @sundogplanets Heck, prefix it with "good" and it could be a term of affection. "You met Bruce? He's a good fuckweasel."

[wtl@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets It’s a technical term, reserved for astronomers’ use.

[soulshine@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets

I love you.

[nini@oldbytes.space]

@sundogplanets "Fuckweasels" seems almost genteel by what you could potentially call them.

[gunnarson@norden.social]

@sundogplanets well done

[glennejp@techhub.social]

@sundogplanets A badge of honour. Sort of.

[pa27@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets Fuckweasels seems a bit light to me.... How about Nazi fuckweasels? After all, spacex isn't the bad guy per se, it's that drug addled nazi at the helm that's the problem.

[cazmockett@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets yell yeah!

[mattmoose@mastodon.world]

@sundogplanets
I absolutely detest this imposition of technology over the rights of nature to remain untampered with. Our skies, our safety. How do we spell NO YOU DON'T large enough for them to understand? I call this an #ecological #emergency

[scottcheloha@bsd.network]

@sundogplanets i think you should be proud of yourself. i would be proud of myself.

[zenheathen@beige.party]

@sundogplanets Badge of honour

[dasra@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets So ElonZ is still getting
more money than he ever going to need,
that disgusting pig.

[mndflayr@metalhead.club]

@sundogplanets

So they censored away the stronger but more fitting insults you used?

[arod@social.coop]

@sundogplanets fuckweasel is the exactly precise and perfect term for this, well done

[heartofcoyote@neuromatch.social]

@sundogplanets
““For example, baseless claims about harmful interference from Amazon, Viasat, and WISPA (Association for Broadband Without Boundaries) reflect a fundamental failure of reading comprehension,” SpaceX said in urging the FCC to reject the “anticompetitive arguments.””

Meanwhile, in the real world, a “fundamental failure of reading comprehension” by people reacting to your proposal means you wrote a shitty proposal.

They aren’t taking the FCC’s authority or process even the least bit seriously. Most likely because SpaceX’s Chief Fuckwit believes the fix is in and he won’t be stopped.

[ginevracat@toot.community]

@sundogplanets @LJ

[fartnuggets@jorts.horse]

@sundogplanets I appreciate your hard work in service of the public's best interests, and that feels like a career goal met, IMO.

[welshpixie@mastodon.art]

@sundogplanets bahahahaha XD

[linuxandyarn@hachyderm.io]

@sundogplanets If the political classes want to normalize the existence of billionaires, then we deserve at least to normalize all the expletives we need to describe these rapacious fucknozzles.

[vk6flab@mastodon.radio]

@sundogplanets not to mention the RF spectrum pollution which affects radio astronomy projects like the SKA and radio spectrum users across the planet.