Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. More breathless, but vague praise for #Mythos.

More breathless, but vague praise for #Mythos.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
mythosmozillaclaudeanthropic
3 Posts 2 Posters 5 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
    paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
    paco@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    More breathless, but vague praise for #Mythos. Now #mozilla's CTO has come out with a detail-free, hyperbole-laden blog post.

    I can't get anything below the surface level on this blog post. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places.

    • The blog post itself contains no links or references (except a link to a prior blog post)
    • The Firefox 150 release notes has zero mentions of #Claude, #Anthropic, or Mythos.
    • The security advisories in Firefox 150 lists 41 bugs
      • Anthropic is credited exactly 3 times.
      • The blog post says This week’s release of Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation
      • it is not clear why the blog says 271, the release lists 41 issues, and only 3 acknowledge Anthropic
    • I've tried looking on Mozilla's bugzilla and I have no access to any bug that is named in those release notes. I can't even see the conversation, much less the code change.

    How is someone supposed to put this blog post's claims into context?

    sundew@beige.partyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    0
    • paco@infosec.exchangeP paco@infosec.exchange

      More breathless, but vague praise for #Mythos. Now #mozilla's CTO has come out with a detail-free, hyperbole-laden blog post.

      I can't get anything below the surface level on this blog post. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places.

      • The blog post itself contains no links or references (except a link to a prior blog post)
      • The Firefox 150 release notes has zero mentions of #Claude, #Anthropic, or Mythos.
      • The security advisories in Firefox 150 lists 41 bugs
        • Anthropic is credited exactly 3 times.
        • The blog post says This week’s release of Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation
        • it is not clear why the blog says 271, the release lists 41 issues, and only 3 acknowledge Anthropic
      • I've tried looking on Mozilla's bugzilla and I have no access to any bug that is named in those release notes. I can't even see the conversation, much less the code change.

      How is someone supposed to put this blog post's claims into context?

      sundew@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
      sundew@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
      sundew@beige.party
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @paco "We’ve led the industry in building and adopting Rust"

      Um, yeah, about that...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rust_(programming_language)#2020%E2%80%93present:_Mozilla_layoffs_and_Rust_Foundation

      paco@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundew@beige.partyS sundew@beige.party

        @paco "We’ve led the industry in building and adopting Rust"

        Um, yeah, about that...

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rust_(programming_language)#2020%E2%80%93present:_Mozilla_layoffs_and_Rust_Foundation

        paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
        paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
        paco@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @sundew Yeah, I found that pretty rich. At best it is a "we knew them when" claim. Because Mozilla turned their back on it really hard a long time ago.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
          R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups