> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
-
> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
Depends on what you mean by fine. If you mean in an ethical sense, then no. If you mean in a practical sense, then also no.
-
> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
Depends on what you mean by fine. If you mean in an ethical sense, then no. If you mean in a practical sense, then also no.
@xgranade and if you mean fine as aesthetically pleasingly c.f. Fine arts, then also no.
-
> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
Depends on what you mean by fine. If you mean in an ethical sense, then no. If you mean in a practical sense, then also no.
@xgranade in an everything-on-fire-this-is-fine sense, perhaps
-
> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
Depends on what you mean by fine. If you mean in an ethical sense, then no. If you mean in a practical sense, then also no.
@xgranade I was discussing this earlier with someone.
If it wasn't a planet killing nazi machine, and it was more akin to code "autocomplete". Yeh, I don't think anyone would object.
Right, now, no, it's not "fine"
-
> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
Depends on what you mean by fine. If you mean in an ethical sense, then no. If you mean in a practical sense, then also no.
If only it were possible to keep industry from evaluating the usefulness of the LLM on its own merits. If merely by inhibiting self-identified leftists from discussing what they are, they could be put back in their cage, it would become a different world than the the one to where we are headed.
-
> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
Depends on what you mean by fine. If you mean in an ethical sense, then no. If you mean in a practical sense, then also no.
@xgranade tech debt at scale? The same 5 zero days like a boot on the neck forever?
-
> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
Depends on what you mean by fine. If you mean in an ethical sense, then no. If you mean in a practical sense, then also no.
@xgranade
I've seen so many people not realizing that programming is also hard work and to some degree an art form
you can't just say "LLM/diffusion assets are bad" and continue with "LLM code is fine" and expect it to make sense...
-
> LLM-assisted coding is fine.
Depends on what you mean by fine. If you mean in an ethical sense, then no. If you mean in a practical sense, then also no.
@xgranade Is there a way to make ethical LLM-assisted coding? Using chinese local open-weight models is more ethical than using ClosedAI ChatGPT? Or the only correct choice is to create ethical data collection, which pays its data contributors and then train LLM based on that?
-
@xgranade Is there a way to make ethical LLM-assisted coding? Using chinese local open-weight models is more ethical than using ClosedAI ChatGPT? Or the only correct choice is to create ethical data collection, which pays its data contributors and then train LLM based on that?
@optozorax @xgranade If it's from China it is by definition not ethical.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
