Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
actuallyautistitheoryofmindpsychologyneurodiversityempathy
138 Posts 59 Posters 12 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

    Error 1) Presupposition / Loaded framing. The task assumes that when harm occurs, someone usually gets blamed. That assumption isn't tested & is built into the question.

    Error 2) False dichotomy. Moral evaluation is reduced to blame vs no blame, leaving no room for partial, shared, or non-punitive responsibility.

    Error 3) Category error. Conflation of blame and responsibility. Responsibility for outcomes is treated as identical to moral condemnation, collapsing two very different concepts.

    ⬇️

    confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #103

    @KatyElphinstone some good stuff here which is worth keeping in mind more generally when looking at root causes and choice of language

    katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.socialC confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.social

      @KatyElphinstone some good stuff here which is worth keeping in mind more generally when looking at root causes and choice of language

      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
      katyelphinstone@mas.to
      wrote last edited by
      #104

      @confusedMiddleAgedDad

      Yes - I've been fascinated by logic recently. I feel it can be usefully used in a lot of contexts that involve dismantling power structures.

      confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

        Autistic people, after all, are known for preferring logic (I certainly do).

        And we’re also known for thinking outside the box – meaning that if we’re forced to make false decisions based on faulty assumptions, then we are quite likely to make the ‘wrong’ choice.

        Interested to hear others’ thoughts on this! And I’ll be looking for another influential study to look closely at.

        I really enjoy analyzing things! 😊

        End of thread. 🧵

        travisfw@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        travisfw@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        travisfw@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #105

        @KatyElphinstone really interesting.

        My thoughts; the theory of mind impairment interpretation requires the assumption that the only morally relevant feature was Janet's belief state, when in fact participants may have been rating her process of belief formation as a separate moral dimension.

        The study did not control for the source of the belief. If Janet made her recommendation to swim based on personal experience instead of relying on a book, I bet the study would have different findings.

        travisfw@fosstodon.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

          @confusedMiddleAgedDad

          Yes - I've been fascinated by logic recently. I feel it can be usefully used in a lot of contexts that involve dismantling power structures.

          confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          confusedmiddleageddad@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #106

          @KatyElphinstone systematic logical thinking with some careful use of language and definitions can be very useful for uncovering things. Making things about a moral judgement, quite possibly unintentionally, too early in the process means you may not find your way to the true root cause.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

            @hellomiakoda

            💟🙏

            I'm the same.

            This thread is actually a byproduct out of an article I'm writing on autistic empathy. I'm nearly done but these are the kinds of things that will go into it.

            (And when finished I'll be asking for people's thoughts / feedback!)

            hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            hellomiakoda@pdx.social
            wrote last edited by
            #107

            @KatyElphinstone I've got to say... it's not a fun time to be empathetic.

            katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH hellomiakoda@pdx.social

              @KatyElphinstone I've got to say... it's not a fun time to be empathetic.

              katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
              katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
              katyelphinstone@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #108

              @hellomiakoda

              True 😢

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                Security Verification

                favicon

                (medicalxpress.com)

                In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                ⬇️

                #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                log@mastodon.sdf.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                log@mastodon.sdf.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                log@mastodon.sdf.org
                wrote last edited by
                #109

                @KatyElphinstone Wikipedia was around in 2011. Sounds like the questions were developed by an allistic person, as it does not consider whether Janet should have shared knowledge on jellyfish to a friend.

                "Did you know that some of the most dangerous animals on Earth are the box jellyfish and the man o' war? We should probably get out of here."

                versus

                "I don't really know much about jellyfish. Did you know kayaks were originally seal skin and whale bone? These plastic ones are lighter."

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                  katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                  katyelphinstone@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #110

                  @Tooden

                  I like your angle 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • evdhmn@ecoevo.socialE evdhmn@ecoevo.social

                    @KatyElphinstone
                    Wow ok I have so many thoughts and want to research this back clinically. I’m happy to see this thread getting some action I’ll see what I can throw on and see what others have to say. Keep in mind.
                    The whole lack of empathy thing is least 🤔. 86-90 years old at least.

                    Plus there’s another angle I have to run down thanks for the thread!

                    katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                    katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                    katyelphinstone@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #111

                    @EVDHmn

                    Great 😊🎉

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cybervegan@autistics.lifeC cybervegan@autistics.life

                      @KatyElphinstone I like to say there's always another option in a forced binary choice. Like the trolley problem - group A or group B gets killed: you choose. What about slipping the points so the trolley doesn't hit either group? These contrived problems often assume there is no 3rd option, without ever considering if there is one. I think Autistics are much more likely to identify the "3rd option". I've often found myself in work situations where management have identified the "two possible" solutions, and I've been called awkward for asking about the (to me) third option they never even identified.

                      kierkegaanks@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kierkegaanks@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kierkegaanks@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #112

                      @cybervegan

                      Link Preview Image
                      The Trolley Problem Explained: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas - Philosopedia

                      Imagine standing near a railway switch as a runaway train hurtles down the track toward five unsuspecting people. You realize immediately that doing nothing

                      favicon

                      Philosopedia (philosopedia.org)

                      cybervegan@autistics.lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • kierkegaanks@beige.partyK kierkegaanks@beige.party

                        @cybervegan

                        Link Preview Image
                        The Trolley Problem Explained: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas - Philosopedia

                        Imagine standing near a railway switch as a runaway train hurtles down the track toward five unsuspecting people. You realize immediately that doing nothing

                        favicon

                        Philosopedia (philosopedia.org)

                        cybervegan@autistics.lifeC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cybervegan@autistics.lifeC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cybervegan@autistics.life
                        wrote last edited by
                        #113

                        @Kierkegaanks I think you're missing the point tbh.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                          Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                          The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                          Security Verification

                          favicon

                          (medicalxpress.com)

                          In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                          ⬇️

                          #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                          jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.place
                          wrote last edited by
                          #114

                          @KatyElphinstone Reading through the article this part stood put to me.

                          ”””
                          The researchers tested 13 autistic adults and 13 non-autistic adults on about 50 scenarios similar to the jellyfish example.
                          ”””

                          This sounds like a small sample to me.

                          I also wonder how they partitioned the sample? If they sorted individuals on behaviour typically seen as ”autistic”, and then tested if the cohort had a higher likelihood of the property they partitioned on, then thet have proven nothing.

                          katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                            @gooba42

                            Ooh beautifully put!! I'm bookmarking your post so I don't forget.

                            gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gooba42@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #115

                            @KatyElphinstone Thank you for saying so, it's nice when "makes sense to me" translates for other people too.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                              Autistic people, after all, are known for preferring logic (I certainly do).

                              And we’re also known for thinking outside the box – meaning that if we’re forced to make false decisions based on faulty assumptions, then we are quite likely to make the ‘wrong’ choice.

                              Interested to hear others’ thoughts on this! And I’ll be looking for another influential study to look closely at.

                              I really enjoy analyzing things! 😊

                              End of thread. 🧵

                              multipass@blorbo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              multipass@blorbo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              multipass@blorbo.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #116

                              @KatyElphinstone I don’t think it’s necessarily involuntary manslaughter, but speaking as an authority on jellyfish when she wasn’t led to a tragic, fatal consequence. It certainly proves incorrect that infuriatingly pernicious axiom, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” #actuallyautistic

                              cinebox@masto.hackers.townC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • multipass@blorbo.socialM multipass@blorbo.social

                                @KatyElphinstone I don’t think it’s necessarily involuntary manslaughter, but speaking as an authority on jellyfish when she wasn’t led to a tragic, fatal consequence. It certainly proves incorrect that infuriatingly pernicious axiom, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” #actuallyautistic

                                cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cinebox@masto.hackers.town
                                wrote last edited by
                                #117

                                @multipass @KatyElphinstone and the second sentence is vague. Was Janet making statements about a subject she knew nothing about? Or did she “know” for certain that jellyfish are harmless? Did someone lie to Janet? Did Janet have a past experience with some hypothetical stingerless jellyfish?

                                kir@mastodon.unoK 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                  @KatyElphinstone Reading through the article this part stood put to me.

                                  ”””
                                  The researchers tested 13 autistic adults and 13 non-autistic adults on about 50 scenarios similar to the jellyfish example.
                                  ”””

                                  This sounds like a small sample to me.

                                  I also wonder how they partitioned the sample? If they sorted individuals on behaviour typically seen as ”autistic”, and then tested if the cohort had a higher likelihood of the property they partitioned on, then thet have proven nothing.

                                  katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  katyelphinstone@mas.to
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #118

                                  @jordgubben

                                  So it's a form of selection bias I suppose. If that were the case, yes.

                                  jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                                    Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                                    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                                    Security Verification

                                    favicon

                                    (medicalxpress.com)

                                    In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                                    ⬇️

                                    #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                                    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    artemis@dice.camp
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #119

                                    @KatyElphinstone

                                    Allistics never seem to notice that the less detail they have in front of them, the more assumptions they make. They mentally add information into scenarios & then extrapolate based on what they assumed but did not specify.

                                    katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                      @KatyElphinstone

                                      Allistics never seem to notice that the less detail they have in front of them, the more assumptions they make. They mentally add information into scenarios & then extrapolate based on what they assumed but did not specify.

                                      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      katyelphinstone@mas.to
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #120

                                      @artemis

                                      Yes. To be fair, we all do this to some extent. But neurodivergent folk do it less - relying on heuristics I mean.

                                      My feeling is that's also why we get quite tired in unfamiliar contexts. We are taking in a lot more original information.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cinebox@masto.hackers.townC cinebox@masto.hackers.town

                                        @multipass @KatyElphinstone and the second sentence is vague. Was Janet making statements about a subject she knew nothing about? Or did she “know” for certain that jellyfish are harmless? Did someone lie to Janet? Did Janet have a past experience with some hypothetical stingerless jellyfish?

                                        kir@mastodon.unoK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kir@mastodon.unoK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kir@mastodon.uno
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #121

                                        @cinebox @multipass @KatyElphinstone
                                        And what's the relationship between the girls? Why Janet was invested about the authority of knowing about the safety of swimming there?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • wynke@mendeddrum.orgW wynke@mendeddrum.org

                                          @CynAq @KatyElphinstone 'It depends' is the answer to a *lot* of questions.

                                          coth@social.creatureofthehill.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          coth@social.creatureofthehill.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          coth@social.creatureofthehill.com
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #122

                                          @CynAq@beige.party @KatyElphinstone@mas.to @wynke@mendeddrum.org
                                          One of the many stickers on the side of our truck... If we had the spoons we would take a pic, but
                                          🤷‍♀️

                                          https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/1740718571/the-custom-sticker-pack-pick-any-5-vinyl

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          coth@social.creatureofthehill.comC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups