please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I'm secretly a fan of AI/LLM's but no, I won't use them in their current form.
Once it's modular - I can fit it easily into a linux PC
Once it's user-trainable - And not a theft machine of the arts and commons for the richest people on earth
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial what do you mean with „chat“ ? Talking or working? I am a developer and I use it for developing and testing
-
@indigoparadox I miss old search too! duck duck go still has one.
@falcennial I mean, DuckDuckGo was my first stop until recently, but it's even worse at finding things than StartPage which I always end up at, so I just started defaulting to that. And that isn't great at finding stuff either! No boolean operators, and stuff just plain doesn't turn up!
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
Like, chat as a fake friend? Hell no.
Or one-shot "explain why this SQL code thing isnt working". Yeah, I do that.
Going through a SQL class right now, and the LLM output IS helpful, when compared to #Zybooks. Fuck Zybooks. Worse than slop.
These things are crystallized associations of knowledge copied from everything thats not bolted down.
LLM tools are useful, but they are tools. Atttributing "chat" or communication is anthropomorphizing a massive multi billion dimensional array.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Honestly, I wouldn’t know how to. I’m sure I could if I was bothered but I’m not.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I'd say not at all because I don't use it for assistance, but I put a couple times a month because I do occasionally chat with it to test its limits (biases, boundaries, absurdities)
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial@mastodon.social
where's 'using one to answer this pole' -
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial @cyb3rrunn3r unfortunately it’s „a few times per month“ just because it’s the only way to find something in our stupid intranet system if I don’t know the _exact_ term
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial okay, I did try it out twice.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Chat? Like a conversation? Never. I will admit to using an LLM to convert a normal paragraph into a structured format my Director wants event summaries in, does that count?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial 'Chat' voluntarily, I don't. I am sometimes forced to use LLM chatbots as a sort of text-based phone-tree so I can get to the actual person I need to talk to or form I need to fill out.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Privately, almost never. At work, over 1 hour per day. If my employee has nothing against putting their code into suspicious system, that’s not my problem!
-
@Rhodium103
nicely put.@falcennial @Rhodium103 I'm also going to interpret "telling customer service chatbot to fuck off and get me an actual customer service representative" as not counting as "chatting".
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Define "chat with." Does "yell at to do stuff in copilot-cli" count?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial does spamming variations on "let me speak to a human" cause there's no other way to get support for services count? otherwise none
-
@falcennial @Rhodium103 I'm also going to interpret "telling customer service chatbot to fuck off and get me an actual customer service representative" as not counting as "chatting".
@dalias lol. This is so real
-
@falcennial Privately, almost never. At work, over 1 hour per day. If my employee has nothing against putting their code into suspicious system, that’s not my problem!
@falcennial @aemstuz What an opportunity to put backdoors all over the system. “LLM gave me this code”. -
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Wow so many disgusting AI users to block in this thread! Thanks!
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial For office and personal work? A lot, and yes, willingly. I guess I'm one of the lazy ass that wouldn't do things the hard way if I don't have to, and I don't. I wouldn't call that chatting with the thing though. I only care about my bottom line, results. I don't pretend the thing is intelligent or even friendly. As far as I'm concerved it's just a sofisticated information storage and retrieval tool. No point in falling in love or hating it.
