Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
9 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mle_online@social.afront.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

    I can't imagine anyone other than someone living in a Silicon Valley bubble thinking google has cachet. Does this man even know what cachet means?

    petrillic@hachyderm.ioP bytex64@awesome.gardenB angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA stoneymonster@stoney.monsterS botvolution@mastodon.sdf.orgB 6 Replies Last reply
    0
    • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

      The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

      I can't imagine anyone other than someone living in a Silicon Valley bubble thinking google has cachet. Does this man even know what cachet means?

      petrillic@hachyderm.ioP This user is from outside of this forum
      petrillic@hachyderm.ioP This user is from outside of this forum
      petrillic@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @MLE_online shall we issue a lettre de cachet for them?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

        The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

        I can't imagine anyone other than someone living in a Silicon Valley bubble thinking google has cachet. Does this man even know what cachet means?

        bytex64@awesome.gardenB This user is from outside of this forum
        bytex64@awesome.gardenB This user is from outside of this forum
        bytex64@awesome.garden
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @MLE_online “Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM,” but even dumber.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

          The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

          I can't imagine anyone other than someone living in a Silicon Valley bubble thinking google has cachet. Does this man even know what cachet means?

          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
          angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @MLE_online

          Come to think of it, every reasonably big "tech" company has burned their reputation, prestige or whatever to the ground.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

            The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

            I can't imagine anyone other than someone living in a Silicon Valley bubble thinking google has cachet. Does this man even know what cachet means?

            stoneymonster@stoney.monsterS This user is from outside of this forum
            stoneymonster@stoney.monsterS This user is from outside of this forum
            stoneymonster@stoney.monster
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @MLE_online Maybe they misspelled cash.

            rglenn@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • stoneymonster@stoney.monsterS stoneymonster@stoney.monster

              @MLE_online Maybe they misspelled cash.

              rglenn@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rglenn@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rglenn@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @stoneymonster @MLE_online could be a Canadian dictating "cash, eh?"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

                The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

                I can't imagine anyone other than someone living in a Silicon Valley bubble thinking google has cachet. Does this man even know what cachet means?

                botvolution@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                botvolution@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                botvolution@mastodon.sdf.org
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @MLE_online
                I've just read the techcrunch piece about how google are "reinventing" search, and it's clear nobody in the tech world (most journos included) have the smallest idea what ordinary people using tech products actually want from them.

                mle_online@social.afront.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • botvolution@mastodon.sdf.orgB botvolution@mastodon.sdf.org

                  @MLE_online
                  I've just read the techcrunch piece about how google are "reinventing" search, and it's clear nobody in the tech world (most journos included) have the smallest idea what ordinary people using tech products actually want from them.

                  mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mle_online@social.afront.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @botvolution When we said we wanted search engines to stop showing us what they decided we asked for instead of what we actually asked for, these CEOs and reporters mimicked the shit search engines and decided what we asked for was more of that instead of less.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

                    The New York Times tech reporter says google is going to win the AI race because it has something other tech companies lack: cachet.

                    I can't imagine anyone other than someone living in a Silicon Valley bubble thinking google has cachet. Does this man even know what cachet means?

                    jlamoree@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jlamoree@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jlamoree@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @MLE_online I dunno, cachet seemed to work for Alta Vista, MapQuest, and Ask Jeeves.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups