Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. > [@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz](https://activitypub.space/user/strypey%40mastodon.nzoss.nz) [said](https://activitypub.space/post/https%3A%2F%2Fmastodon.nzoss.nz%2Fusers%2Fstrypey%2Fstatuses%2F116071781202626645):

> [@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz](https://activitypub.space/user/strypey%40mastodon.nzoss.nz) [said](https://activitypub.space/post/https%3A%2F%2Fmastodon.nzoss.nz%2Fusers%2Fstrypey%2Fstatuses%2F116071781202626645):

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
5 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
    julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
    julian@activitypub.space
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    > @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz said:
    >
    > We could instead try to agree on a separate place for all discussions about fediverse coordination (would it rub anyone up the wrong way if I described this as fediverse governance?). But it does makes sense to discuss a federated network in a federated network, rather than a separate, centralised forum.

    I keep harping on this one point because it just makes so much sense that it'd be silly not to. The new blood (new software devs implementing AP) always appear on fedi, not some third-party site, first.

    To your main point, fedi on Mastodon is all just everybody talking in the same room. Certainly that's why it seems like there's so much meta-discussion about AP.

    This isn't the case on the threadiverse, where discussions are segregated/categorized by community.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @strypey discussions about development are often tagged with #fedidev

      julian@activitypub.spaceJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        @strypey discussions about development are often tagged with #fedidev

        julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julian@activitypub.space
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Right, which ActivityPub.Space follows and auto categorizes, which ends up as a way for microblog content to make its way into the threadiverse. @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz

        @silverpill@mitra.social sorry for interjecting 😁

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
          julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
          julian@activitypub.space
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz is that true, though? Mastodon doesn't segregate topics by interest group or community because that's a UX decision by Mastodon. It's a wilful ignorance of explicit categorization by design.

          Now, I want to be very explicit here that I'm not saying this is a bad thing. Mastodon doesn't have any major incentive to implement groups, much less implement them like the threadiverse does.

          But it is by design that it's all lumped together into a singular feed.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
            julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
            julian@activitypub.space
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz I disagree, I view the content not as a function of its lowest common denominator (the singular note adrift in a sea of other notes), but as a part of a larger entity, the thread, or a category/community.

            That microblogs are incapable of realizing that is a design decision on their part πŸ™‚

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic on
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups