Exactly

no

misapplication of the No True Scotsman fallacy

there is no appeal to purity and generalization in my statement

i am simply saying here you have this group that defiles what Jesus teaches. and i am excluding them from a valid definition of Christianity for doing that. it's a classification, not purity, not generalization

no True Scotsman would be if i said this is the only way you can be a Christian, and exclude them on that basis. not what i did

It's always the same shit, just with a different Pope.

All the right words, none of the action to back it up!

The New Testament contains many references to Jesus warning of false prophets. The concept of Zionism did not yet exist and was going to take about another 2,000 years to threaten humanity.

West said it best. They took the street out of Jesus. The relatable part. Love and peace.

oh they believe in *a* jesus

their jesus carries an AR-15, worships plutocracy, and hates trans people and immigrants

of course, that has nothing to do with the actual Jesus

so they are fake Christians, hewing to bigotry and ignorance and hate

a cult of violent morons

Thanks, this means I have so far lambasted the wrong person for writing about Maria Magdalene that she 'had so many men before, in very many ways' (clearly implying she was a slut), but Webber must have condoned it, absolving me!

There's lyrics from no less than two songs that come to mind:

Tim Rice: "Why you let the things you did get so out of hand. You'd have managed better if you'd had it planned. Now why'd you choose such a backward time and such a strange land?"

John Lennon : "The way things are going, They’re gonna crucify me."

Just to say, if J6 had come here and now, they would *certainly* have crucified him.